Documents

Opinion — Cosmopolitan Club v. Virginia

Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1908

—Decided February 24, 1908. … Co., 61 Missouri, 24; Attorney General v. Chicago & C. R. R.

Division of Investment Management

Agency decision · Agency decision

49 18 1,134 1,177 211 223 429 220 66 21 306 150 67 24 22 20 252 390 37 18 *** *** 65 *** *** 26 3,491 2024Q2 509 580 49 17 1,146 1,182 207 227 429 232 64 20 316 148 57 24 22 13 240 381 35 17 *** *** … 90 24 305 266 117 380 *** *** 121 223 69 47 314 110 3,189 26 2022Q4 605 392 *** *** 1,085 164 45 *** *** 216 924 60 139 29 87 24 294 269 112 378 *** *** 125 219 75 43 313 113 3,222 2023Q1 602 351 *

Safety Zones; Northern California and Lake Tahoe Area Annual Fourth of July Fireworks Events

Federal Register · Rule · Jun 28, 2019

Coast Guard; telephone (415) 399-3585, email SFWaterways@uscg.mil. … Location The fireworks will be launched from shore along the Carquinez Strait at approximate position 38°01′32″ N, 122°08′24″ W.

Petitioners Brief — Butler v. McKey

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1944

* (353) The Supreme Court of California held in that case that this was not a statement of fact, not ‘legal’ evidence, and that the default judgment entered in the case was absolutely void. (353, 399 … Dated, San Francisco, California, January 24, 1944. ‘ ‘THEODORE J. ROCHE, JAMES FARRAHER, ‘THEODORE H. RocHe, Attorneys for Petitioner. GeorGce A. STOCKFLETH, Of Counsel.

Opposition Brief — Latimer v. Stainer, 112 S. Ct. 186 (1991) (No. 91-148)

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1991

STAINER, Respondent C22 399 NO. 91-148 » OFFER OF The Cl Court, US. Ls DB BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI David A. … Birdsong, 679 F.2d 24 (Se Cae Rens oe ee ee ee eee ee Littlefield v. Ft.

Opposition — Giacalone v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1979

Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 52 (1970). See also South Dakota v. Opperman, 428 U.S. 364, 367 (1976); Texas v. White, 423 U.S. 67 (1975); Cooper v. California, 386 U.S. 58 (1967). 2. … Petitioner, of course, acknowledges (Pet. 24) that this is the accustomed practice under the Rule.

Opposition — Johnson v. J. O. L.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1980

Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399 (1923). See also, Parham v. J.R., 442 U.S. 584 (1979); Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158 (1944); Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645 (1972). … March 24, 1980). All of these cases concern the constitutionality of statutes involving termination of parental rights rather than adoption.

Jurisdictional Statement — Pep Boys, Manny, Moe & Jack of Cal., Inc. v. Pyroil Sales Co.

Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1936

Rep. 24, 67 L. Ed. 14 ..... STATUTES CITED. ’ Act of January 31, 1928 (28 U., S. C. … Ct. 399, 63 L. Ed. 876; Zucht v. King, 260 U. S. 174, 43 Sup. Ct. 24, 67 L. Ed. 194; ‘Silt v. Moffat Tunnel Imp. Dist., 262 U, Ss. 710, 43 Sup. Ct. 694, 67 L. Ed. 1194. B.

Brief for the Petitioner in Reply — Shaw Warehouse Co. v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Petitioner in Reply · 1963

Brucke ‘. 399 US. 579 (1998) 4 US. v. Otley, 34 F. … AF 18384 622 A/1C(P) * Honorable Sir: The above was given a discharge under other than honor- able conditions, DDForm 258AF, on November 24, 1956, by reason of conviction of Civil Court AFR 39-22(

Opposition Brief — Leeds v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1948

JURISDICTION The judgment of the court below was entered on April 5, 1948 (R. 23-24). The petition for a writ of certiorari was filed on June 30, 1948. … S. at 399). In the case at bar, the effect of the sequestrations is not shown.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Christopher Everson, Petitioner v. John Armstrong, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 20, 2018

. * 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 CHRISTOPHER EVERSON, 21 PlaintffAppellant, 22 23 No. 16-3381 V. 24 25 26 27 28 JOHN ARMSTRONG, OFFICIAL AND INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, Scorr SEMPLE, COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION … Dyer, 208 F.3d 394, 399 (2d Cir. 2000) (internal quotation marks omitted) "Once a final judgment has been entered on the merits of the case, that judgment will bar any subsequent litigation by the same

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Harry Alexander, Inc. v. Friend

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1955

Ct. 456 . .4, 5, 6, 2a STATUTES: Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers Compen- sation Act of March 24, 1927, 44 Stat. 1424, 33 U.S.C.A. 901, et seq. .. … D.C. 216, 206 F. 2d 435, cert. denied 346 U.S. 399, and cases there cited.”’ The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in Riley et al. v.

Opposition Brief — Donlon v. City of Oxnard

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1998

Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat.) 264, 399-400 (1821). NIM ALINE Re gre MME NC Med ee APR OS Mem | B. … See Rule 977(b)(1) of the California Rules of Court, quoted in the Petition at 24. IV.

Brief for the United States in Opposition — Virginia National Bank v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States in Opposition · 1972

App. 93-24). It alternatively held them deductible as taxes (Pet. App.. 24. 27). … Lincolu-Saraugs & Loan Assn., 403 U.S. 345, 399, “the fact that a payment is imposed com-.

Prologue — Lick Fork Marina, Inc. v. Indiana

Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 2005

American National Bank & Trust Co., 78 Il. 2d 353, 362, 399 N.E.2d 1295, 1299, 35 Ill. Dec. 767 (1980) ..... TENG pera ban are EN eae Oras 17 Olson v. United States, 292 U.S. 246, 255, 78 L. … Pacard, BP Wie Sd Ce hes 1, 7, 8, 18, 19, 24, 25 Warner/Elektra/Atlantic Corp. v. County of DuPage, (CA7 ILL) 991 F 2d 1280, reh, en banc, den. (CA7 ILL) 1993°US Apo.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Alex Antonio Bynes, Petitioner v. Florida

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 14, 2026

Const. 24 3a Appellant acknowledges that section 790.23 has been held by this Court not to violate the Second Amendment. See Fleming v. … Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970). He submits, however, that Williams was incorrectly decided and is contrary to the understanding of the Sixth Amendment at the time of the Founding.

Petitioners Brief — Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. Haslip

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1991

Illinois, 399 U.S. 235 (1970)]. Given Pacific Mutual’s tenuous connection to the punish- able conduct of Mr. … $ 1,500,000 1,300,000 1,000,000* 1,000,000 24. 25. 26. 27. -A 8- Carlis v. Ft.

Brief for the United States — Teamsters v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1934

*(R. 24-25.) A petition for rehearing was filed and-denied. (R. 26-28.) SUMMARY OF neemieiees ENT _— i. … United States, 54 F. (2d) 397, 399. Contra, Harris v. United States, 5 F. Supp. 368 (D.C. Idaho). This suit is & . adn? of preceded the filing of the present suit.

Motion and Amicus Curiae Brief — Cheung Sum Shee v. Nagle

Supreme Court brief · Motion and Amicus Curiae Brief · 1925

---eeeee 7 So Hapk Yon, Ex Parte, 1 Fed. (2d) 814...-.--- 23, 24 United States v. Mrs. Gue Lim, 176 U. S. 459. .4, 5, 13, 24 United States v. St. Paul M. & M. Ry. Co., 247 U.S. … S., 399, 400 (1921).

Opposition — Texas v. Garza

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1983

State, 24 Tex.App. 705, 7 S.W. 40, 42 (Ct.App. 1886). However, once jeopardy attached, the 5. … Bretz, 437 U.S. 28, 98 S.Ct. 2156, 57 L.Ed.2d 24 (1978).