Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
7,792 results
0.15s
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 8, 2020
O Centro Espirita Beneficente Unaio do Vegetal, 546 U.S. 418, 423 (2006), members of a Brazilian church located in New Mexico were denied permission to use a tea brewed from plants unique to the Amazon … Lee, 455 U.S. at 257.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Janus v. Am. Fed'n, 138 S. Ct. 54 (2017) (No. 16-1466)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
Garcetti, 547 U.S. at 423. … Knox, 567 U.S. at 309.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Hillside Dairy Inc. v. Lyons
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
——— te ~~ Supreme Court, U.S. … See TRW, 534 U.S. at 29.
539 U.S. 59Amicus Curiae Brief — West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 25, 2022
Id. at 423-24 (cleaned up). … Massachusetts, 549 U.S. at 533.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Troxel v. Granville
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
Goff, 92 F.3d 419, 423 (6th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1104 (1997) (stating that “rational basis review, not strict scrutiny,” governs “wholly secular limitations on private school education … Hurley, 515 U.S.
530 U.S. 57Amicus Curiae Brief — Harry C. Calcutt, III, Petitioner v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 24, 2023
S. 462, 482–83 (2011). To the extent the FDIC ALJs are, in fact, purporting to exercise the “judicial Power,” that office should not exist. Cf. Pet. App. 90a–92a (Murphy, J., dissenting). Mr. … See Burgess, 2022 U.S. Dist.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Ford Motor Company v. Buell-Wilson, 127 S. Ct. 2250 (2007) (No. 06-1068)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Danaher, 238 U.S. 482, 490-91 (1915). Punitive damages are one type of civil penalty for which fair notice is particularly important. … State Farm, 538 U.S. at 416.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Maurice M. M. v. Bouknight (Nos. 88-6651, 88-1182)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989
I TI ilibeidt lowing hast eee ea 18 In re Sampson, 29 N.Y.2d 900, 278 N.E.2d 918, FSS Ff 8) eee 17 In re Simpson, 126 Misc. 2d 162, 481 N.Y.S.2d i ene 19 In re Vance A., 105 Misc. 2d 254, 482 N.Y.S … Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972) ............. 16 CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS: U.S. Const. Amend. I, Free Exercise Clause......6, 15, 16, 17 U.S. Const. Amend. V, Self-Incrimination Clause..passim U.S.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 1, 2021
Morse, 551 U.S. at 409. … Cf. id. at 423 (Alito, J., concurring). There may be a risk, for example, that such authority could be exercised disproportionately against students of color or other identified student populations.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
Cases (BNA) 423 D. Colo. 1876), aff'd, 569 F.2d 1074 (10th Cir. 1978)), and the other was reversed on appeal. See Bryant v. International Sehools Servs., Inc., 502 F. … the U.S. and Canada).
Amicus Curiae Brief — McDonough v. Smith (No. 18-485)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2019
Owen, 445 U.S. at 651—52. … Jmbler, 424 U.S. at 423. Prosecutorial immunity thus bars suits against prosecutors for their prosecutorial functions.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Good News Club v. Milford Central School
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
Ass'n., 460 U.S. at 49. … Lee, 505 U.S. 672 (1992); Bd. of Airport Comms of Los Angeles v. Jews for Jesus, 482 U.S. 569 (1987); Cornelius, 473 U.S. at 788; City Council of Los Angeles v.
533 U.S. 98Amicus Curiae Brief — Trump v. Hawaii, 138 S. Ct. 923 (2018) (No. 17-965)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
City of New York, 283 U.S. 473, 482 (1931) (where the defendant is before the court, the court may enjoin the defendant’s con- duct “whether within or without the United States”). … The government suggests (U.S.
Amicus Curiae Brief — 303 Creative LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Aubrey Elenis, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 19, 2022
Free Speech L. 377, 423-25 (2021). … See Duarte, 481 U.S. at 541; Jaycees, 468 U.S. at 613.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Huffman v. Western Nuclear, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1988
Bell Aerospace Co., 416 U.S. 267, 275 (1974). BK. … American Electric Power Service, 461 U.S. 402, 423 (1983): Udall v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 1, 16 (1965); Power Reactor Development Co. v.
486 U.S. 663Amicus Curiae Brief — Uttecht v. Brown
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Witt, 469 U.S. at 423-24. The Washington courts failed to address Mr. … Texas, 448 U.S. 38 (1980), Witt, 469 U.S. at 424, Darden v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 168, 178 (1986), and Morgan vy. Illinois, 504 U.S. 719 (1992).
551 U.S. 1Amicus Curiae Brief — Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
American Mini Theatres, Inc., 427 U.S. 50 (1976), reh’g denied, 429 U.S. 873 (1976). … Brockett, 631 F.2d 185 (9th Cir. 1980), aff'd 454 U.S. 1022 (1981); J-R Distributors, Inc. v. Eiken- berry, 725 F.2d 482 (9th Cir. 1984), app. pending, U.S. Sup. Ct.
475 U.S. 41Amicus Curiae Brief — Clinton v. Jones
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
Pacht- man, 424 U.S. 409 (1976); grand jurors, Imbler, supra, 424 U.S. at 422-423; and other officers, both state and federal. See, e.g., Tenney v. … Ray, 386 U.S., at 554.
520 U.S. 681Amicus Curiae Brief — Associated Industries of Mo. v. Lohman
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
Trinova, 498 U.S. at 380 (citing Container Corp. , 463 U.S. at 169). … Wallace, 288 U.S. 249, 267 (1932); Pacific Co., Lid. v. Johnson, 285 U.S. 480, 493 (1932); and in tie Equal Protection Clause context, Gregg Dyeing Co., 286 U.S. at 482: Lawrence v.
511 U.S. 641Amicus Curiae Brief — Manhattan Cmty. Access Corp. v. Halleck, 139 S. Ct. 360 (2018) (No. 17-1702)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
Jacksonville, 422 U.S. 205 (1975). * Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15, 18 (1971). * RAV. v. St. Paul, 505 U.S. 377 (1992). © Stevens, 559 U.S. at 482. "\ Brandenburg v. … Edmondson Oil Co., 457 U.S. 922, 939 (1982); see also Askins v. U.S.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.