Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.76s
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Indiana
Federal Register · Rule · Jul 25, 2005
Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period will be marked “late.” … National Technology Transfer Advancement Act In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
70 FR 42495Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Sep 1, 2015
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is disapproving revisions to the Texas State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted to meet certain requirements under section 182(c) of the Clean Air Act … The public comment period for our Proposal closed on May 28, 2015. II. Response to Comments We received one comment letter dated May 28, 2015, from the TCEQ (the Commenter) regarding our Proposal.
80 FR 52630Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; OR; Regional Haze Plan for the Second Implementation Period
Federal Register · Rule · Oct 8, 2024
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02 … factors identified in § 7491(g)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
89 FR 81361Environmental Protection AgencyNational Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Halogenated Solvent Cleaning
Federal Register · Rule · Jul 13, 1999
Air Act (CAA). … We will address all public comments in a later final rule based on the proposed rule. We will not start a second comment period on this action. If you want to comment, you must do so at this time.
64 FR 37683Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans Wisconsin
Federal Register · Rule · Jul 23, 1997
During the 30 day public comment period for this final rule, EPA received adverse comments from a private party, who took the position that EPA should redesignate Manitowoc County to attainment. II. … SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the Clean Air Act do not create any new requirements, but simply approve requirements that the State is already imposing.
62 FR 39446Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 27, 2015
This action is in accordance with the federal Clean Air Act (the Act, CAA). DATES: This rule will be effective on April 27, 2015. … Public Comments The public comment period for the January 21, 2015 (80 FR 2846) proposal expired on February 20, 2015, and we did not receive any comments on the proposed actions during this period.
80 FR 16291Environmental Protection AgencyOuter Continental Shelf Air Regulations; Consistency Update for California
Federal Register · Rule · Jun 22, 2006
”), as mandated by section 328(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (“the Act”). … Public Comments and EPA Responses EPA's proposed actions provided 30-day public comment periods. During these periods, we received no comments on the proposed actions.
71 FR 35804Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 1, 2016
Air Act (CAA or Act) section 172(c)(1) and incorporate it into the SIP; (2) to approve the base year emissions inventory for the 2010 1-hour SO 2 NAAQS for the Kentucky portion of the Area pursuant … Ambient air quality monitoring data for the 3-year period must meet a data completeness requirement.
81 FR 86664Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Sep 2, 1997
The intended effect of this action is to approve these provisions into the Maryland SIP, in accordance with the SIP submittal and revision provisions of the Clean Air Act (the Act). … The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2). C.
62 FR 46199Environmental Protection AgencyReview of the Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Sulfur Oxides
Federal Register · Rule · Mar 18, 2019
Reviews of the NAAQS are required by the Clean Air Act (CAA) on a periodic basis. The last review of the primary SO 2 NAAQS was completed in 2010 (75 FR 35520, June 22, 2010). … Legislative Requirements Two sections of the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act) govern the establishment and revision of the NAAQS.
84 FR 9866Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 11, 2017
We provided a 30-day public comment period on the proposed rule, during which we received no comments. 1 Letter from Richard W. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
82 FR 47145Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Notice · Nov 18, 2013
Public comments were previously requested via the Federal Register (78 FR 45188) on July 26, 2013 during a 60-day comment period. This notice allows for an additional 30 days for public comments. … Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory as required by the Clean Air Act, Section 110. Estimated number of respondents: 6 (total). Frequency of response: Annual.
78 FR 69083Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 11, 1997
The intended effect of this action is to approve source-specific RACT determinations which establish the above- mentioned requirements in accordance with Clean Air Act (CAA). … The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2). C.
62 FR 11079Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Nov 10, 1999
EPA is approving these revisions because they are consistent with the requirements set forth in the Clean Air Act (CAA) amendments of 1990. … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period.
64 FR 61213Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Feb 9, 2010
EPA is approving this revision to the Maryland SIP in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
75 FR 6307Environmental Protection AgencyState Operating Permit Programs; Maryland; Revisions to the Acid Rain Regulations
Federal Register · Rule · Apr 25, 2007
EPA is approving these revisions in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
72 FR 20428Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 10, 2009
Public Comments EPA's October 24, 2008 proposed rule provided a 30-day public comment period. … Air Act Amendments of 1990.
74 FR 10176Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Alaska
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 18, 1998
The revisions were submitted in accordance with the requirements of section 110 and Part D of the Clean Air Act (hereinafter the Act). … Background The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, Title V, requires States to develop operating permit programs for most stationary sources.
63 FR 44208Environmental Protection AgencySecond Draft Risk and Exposure Assessment Report for Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)
Federal Register · Notice · Apr 23, 2009
• Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline identified. … SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under section 108(a) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Administrator identifies and lists certain pollutants which “cause or contribute to air pollution which may reasonably be
74 FR 18573Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Sep 14, 2005
This action is being taken under section 110 of the Clean Air Act. … or refer to the Clean Air Act, unless the context indicates otherwise.
70 FR 54267Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.