Documents

Oral argument — M.H. v. Commissioner, Georgia Dept. of Community Health

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 23, 2024

So just one more, just kind of clean up on jurisdictional questions. … But the provision at play here, Your Honor, is EPSDT, early periodic screening diagnosis and treatment. And that provision specifically says you have to provide corrective and ameliorative treatment.

Oral argument — Villegas v. Arbogast

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2021

I think they indicated that they met at the mall, although the time period is not clear. … And it was that act of fabrication that caused Mr.

Oral argument — Albert v. City of Peoria

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 25, 2018

However, would you agree that unless we would find there was frostbite initially, we'd never get to the intervening accident issue, period? … He says we don't do that, but, you know, there's been time when the maintenance workers cannot get there and employees will go in, you know, clean the drains.

Oral argument — Muyingo v. Gonzales

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2006

And, in fact, the immigration judge commented on that during his holding, that that isn't a contradiction. … The reason that the Real ID Act does not impact that decision is because the Real ID Act added 1252A2D, which expands jurisdiction if it was previously precluded prior to the enactment of Real ID Act.

Oral argument — Food & Water Watch, Inc. v. Thomas Vilsack

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 22, 2015

And this is akin to the Supreme Court's decision in Laidlaw, where the plaintiffs simply needed to demonstrate that they had standing based on the alleged statutory violation of the Clean Water Act permit … They did not even respond to this data point when it was presented to them in the comment period. They have no answer. They say it's just anecdotal.

Oral argument — 02-30354 United States v. Glasgow, Duval

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2003

Number one, because there was no objection, are you going to look at it in terms of plain air? If you are, where's the prejudice? There is none. Even the defendant's counsel concedes that. … But that's how we have to act now. But pre-Quash, we were talking about Rule 35, 5K, sentence, whatever.

Oral argument — 02-30354 United States v. Glasgow, Duval

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2003

Number one, because there was no objection, are you going to look at it in terms of plain air? If you are, where's the prejudice? There is none. Even the defendant's counsel concedes that. … We'll be more precise if that's the agreement we want to make, but that's how we have to act now. But pre-Quash, we were talking about Rule 35, 5K, sentence, whatever.

Oral argument — Duplan v. City of New York

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2017

I Recognize that there's that there's a scheme, but I think that's The way that retaliation actions often happen over a pit over sometimes over a long period of time multiple acts of retaliation that it … Our argument is that the Civil Rights Act of 1991?

Oral argument — United States v. Derrick Granger

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2023

Something's in the air, and it's bounced up onto a cell tower, so that's not your home. Well, the cell phone itself is attribution evidence, I would say, so we got a wiretap. … There's a comment on a wire tap to Mr. King that indicates as much.

Oral argument — United States v. Jesse Benton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 12, 2024

Sometimes they say the defendant violated this statute, period. It does not have to have all the elements of the offense in an indictment. … At the very least, it's on plain air. And whatever else might be said about the merits of Mr.

Oral argument — United States v. Sanford-Brown, Limited

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2015

Keep in mind, the False Clean Type was enacted in 1863 to prevent exactly this sort of contract fraud. … It's dispersed to the student periodically, even for such things as living expenses.

Oral argument — Yaakov Markel v. Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2024

That the eating of kosher food may be a religious act. … He's cleaning vats. He's moving things from one place to another. He's changing out hoses. There is no congregation. There's no every day.

Oral argument — FDIC v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2005

And that is what those people there believed, and they acted consistent with that. In the next bond period, when they gave the application, they indicated that they had not lost anything. … Given this piecing together after the fact, seven years down the road, the FDIC has to come up with acts to justify claiming that there was a discovery of dishonesty and loss during the policy period related

Oral argument — Jason Krembel v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2020

And where do you get the waiver of the sovereign immunity under the Federal Tort Claims Act? How do you get this under the Federal Tort Claims Act? Well, under the Federal Tort Claims Act. Go ahead. … And it was that five-week period. And so essentially, Mr. Krimble's case is that during that five-week period, the BOP didn't ensure that I got my Mohs surgery done.

Oral argument — Montiel Rubio v. Bondi

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2025

And so they discern with, yes, there were targeted periods, but there were periods where he weren't pointed out. We get all these cases about the conditions of the country, et cetera. … They shot their guns in the air. They said, we got him. We got the bald man. And when they realized that the neighbor was there, they looked at him and they said, oh, you're not him.

Oral argument — Agere Sys Incetal v. Ad v. En v. Tech Corpetal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 22, 2009

Well, that's an interesting comment because if you read the opinion, which I'm sure you did, they had a 113 counterclaim. … So any other person means any other person, period. And as Your Honor pointed out in talking to Mr.

Oral argument — United States v. Michael Williams

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2024

I did want to respond to one comment that Ms. Bahadur said about gardeners who saw the gloves dropped, and this was discussed in the brief. … They assumed it had been because it hadn't been there before because they kept the sidewalk clean. But the glove that was tied to Mr.

Oral argument — Charles Plymail v. Patrick Mirandy

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2021

Lee, that enforcing, applying the plain air standard. Before you go too much further down the procedural default argument, I think it's a great argument. It's just not one you made beloved. … They didn't comment on it, but it wasn't part of the holding at all. It was a throwaway. They probably didn't comment on it, didn't make a hold of it, because you didn't raise it.

Oral argument — United Cerebral Palsy of Grea v. Bureau of Gambling Control

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2009

The question is, maybe I'm misinterpreting it, you're going to shut down bingo, period? … I appreciate your comments. But I'm not sure now what public interest really means because I assume that we would defer to the legislature.

Oral argument — United States v. Eggleston

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2025

conversation this conversation at the gate they described that culminated in the officers coming up to put cuffs on him and that he didn't he didn't seem as surprised or resist or whatever during that period … up a can of a can of what whatever you want to call I would say it's more fairly characterized is that the officer and direct had done this damage by what he had said and defense counsel was trying to clean