Documents

Oral argument — Big Blue Capital PartnerS v. ReconTrust Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2014

But what is clear in the record is the notice of defaults rescinded, and we will be writing on a clean slate under a new legislative framework. … Does the Oregon Trust Act, or I guess I got the name slightly wrong. Trust Deed Act. Trust Deed Act. Does that give any cause of action to the debtor? Is there a statutory provision in that act?

Oral argument — David Cocroft v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2014

And, of course, your comment, and this is tied in, and maybe I missed something earlier. … It shows a very clean lawn, and it shows a for sale sign. Mr. Cockcroft had the property up for sale. So there was absolutely no sign or evidence that the property was abandoned.

Oral argument — Colbert v. Fontana P D

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 24, 2008

I think Smitty needs to be cleaned up, but it's okay. In this case, it doesn't really matter. This is not the case where it matters in my view. … , acts independently.

Oral argument — Walker v. Harvard University Fellows

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 1, 2016

The plagiarism rule itself says all work submitted must be clean plagiarism, whether inadvertent plagiarism or not. Our point is not that this wasn't plagiarism. … Her testimony is that that is what she intended by the comment.

Oral argument — Carla Wigton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2022

I'd appreciate your comment on that. … For instance, some of the interactions happened off the workplace, outside the work hours, and there's a question as to whether or not bringing someone out to clean a private cabin is related to the business

Oral argument — Wong v. FMR LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 6, 2021

Is there a way to distinguish that conclusion from the conclusion that removing it from the big menu is also a fiduciary act? … Some of these cases seem to talk about having to give notice in a reasonable time period to the plan. Is that with respect to removal from the small menu? Yes, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Inman v. Howe Freightways, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 21, 2019

And what you have is a shorter time period than what you have in Spencer, for example. … And I'm just going to make this comment.

Oral argument — U. S. Bank Nat. Assn. v. Village at Lakeridge, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 31, 2017

It just made the comment that it was the appropriate due diligence for an investment of $5,000, which in this case was none. … Or let's say you have an extensive period of negotiation.

Oral argument — Kansas City Southern Railway v. Sny Island Levee Drainage Dist

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 5, 2016

The CSX2, the Supreme Court's most recent pronouncement on the 4R's Act case, decided about 13 months ago, makes it very clear that there's two things that a plaintiff in a 4R's Act case has to show in … He did not just pick a number out of the air.

Oral argument — The Estate of Valeria Tachiqui v. Stephanie Shavatt

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 12, 2017

But that Brown needed no pattern to show that it was an act by the city. … Well, the Fourth Circuit dealt with the time period in a very similar time period in the Wellham case, which I've cited, and that involved a 10-year period, and the court said that's too attenuated.

Oral argument — Lyndon Pace v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 20, 2025

They are separate acts. … There's no other way in any case besides a very short set period of time.

Oral argument — United States v. Akein Scott

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2017

If he thinks the basis of it was fraudulent inducement, which is basically what he's arguing, then he should have moved to revoke the plea, period. Your Honor, I... … You can look to the government's intent here, and no one has said that the government acted in bad faith. That's correct.

Oral argument — Research Corp. v. Westport Ins. Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 13, 2008

Count 1 is for breach of contract, and that is a clean breach of contract claim. … Ruzzi's comment was that that would – that was not covered by the contract. It was just – it was conversion of technical information.

Oral argument — FDIC v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2005

And that is what those people there believed, and they acted consistent with that. In the next bond period, when they gave the application, they indicated that they had not lost anything. … Given this piecing together after the fact, seven years down the road, the FDIC has to come up with acts to justify claiming that there was a discovery of dishonesty and loss during the policy period related

Oral argument — Suzanne Wooten v. John Roach, Sr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2020

When they are performing acts as an investigator, then I think that's what divides it regarding a grand jury. … That he entered the order of recusal and that he made a comment to the Texas lawyer. Those are the only allegations in the live complaint that's before this court.

Oral argument — People v. Griffin

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 22, 2013

The judge did so by acting the way he did for that period of time, to the extent that based upon the failure to send notice, the judge effectively treated the order as a nullity. That's correct. … Counsel later on cleaned it up and put it in an affidavit from another codee saying the same thing, that Mr. Griffin wasn't there. What about the DNA? Was that additive?

Oral argument — Herrera v. Agents_of_Pennsylvania

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2025

What about the exhaustion period? Wouldn't that also toll the time? I think the exhaustion period would also toll the time. From the limited record we have on appeal, because Mr. … And that's because the plaintiff agrees—I guess the plaintiff in the Civil Rights Act context would agree that what is— there's no dispute about what the sentence actually is? Correct.

Oral argument — Lisa Romain v. Marketa Walters

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2017

It's never been used to outright deny fees or to justify that — that type of act. … Buckhannon said, no, we're going to clean this up. We're going straight to the plain language of what it means to be a prevailing party.

Oral argument — United States v. George Naum, III

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 29, 2024

And it kind of shifted as to whether it was with a clean heart, if you will. I was doing, I was not putting the patients in a bad situation. … And to answer your question, Your Honor, this was a period of eight years. Dr. Naum worked part time at this clinic. Started out with 55 counts, 39 were severed.

Oral argument — Carl Greene v. Railroad Retirement Board

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 22, 2017

After airing and calculating his benefits, the Board proceeded to send Mr. … in paragraph 3 of section 203F of the Social Security Act.