Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Ragsdale v. Wolverine World Wide, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002

Congress only cautioned that an employer may not trade shorter periods of paid leave for the longer periods of unpaid leave prescribed by the Act. Id. at 42. … [Discussion of various comments deleted.]

Amicus Curiae Brief — Moore v. Texas, 136 S. Ct. 2407 (2016) (No. 15-797)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016

Christine Rebman, Comment, The Eighth Amendment and Solitary Confinement: The Gap in Protection from Psychological Consequences, 49 DePaul L. … English Bill of Rights 1689: An Act Declaring the Rights and Liberties of the Subject and Settling the Succession of the Crown, available at English Bill of Rights 1689, Yale L. Sch.

Amicus Curiae Brief — United States, Petitioner v. Zackey Rahimi

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 21, 2023

Act § 821. C. … State statutes typically limit DVPOs to an initial, limited period of time. Compare Ark.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Cedar Rapids Community School Dist. v. Garret F.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999

During the suctioning process, and during any other period when the ventilator is not functioning, air must be pumped in manually through an air bag attached to the tracheotomy tube. Pet. … Congressional statements and declarations (c) Purpose It is the purpose of this chapter to assure that all children with disabilities have available to them, within the time periods specified in section

Amicus Curiae Brief — Auer v. Robbins

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997

The Department received 398 comments on the proposal. 57 Fed. Reg. 37670 (1992). … The DOL classified the “suggested change” as “a significant departure from long- standing policy that is not substantiated by comment.”

Amicus Curiae Brief — Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Petitioner v. Robert F. Kennedy, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 22, 2026

First, CMS alone decides which initial 10 drugs are selected for the Program, and which drugs are selected in each applicable period thereafter. … holding that a compelled-notice provision “is a content-based regulation of speech” because “[b]y compelling individuals to speak a particular message, such notices alter the content of their speech”) (cleaned

Amicus Curiae Brief — Klehr v. AO Smith Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997

a final unlawful act occurs within the final four-year period prior to suit. 5 v. … Moody’s Special Comment, Environmental Risks and Corporate Credit Quality (April 1991). 8 through synergies or other means.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Federal Communications Commission, et al., Petitioners v. Prometheus Radio Project, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 23, 2020

Communications Center did not connect minority ownership to viewpoint diversity, but rather implied that simply allowing minorities a voice within the broadcasting space, whatever content they chose to air … The Commission actively sought comment on ways “to provide minorities and women with greater opportunities to enter the mass media industry, specifically including the broadcast, cable, wireless cable,

Amicus Curiae Brief — Animal Sci. Prods., Inc. v. Hebei Welcome Pharm. Co., 137 S. Ct. 2320 (2017) (No. 16-1220)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017

Air Regulatory Grp. v. … Air Regulatory Grp. v. EPA, 1348. Ct. 2427 (2014). This case, which presents the doctrine of interna- tional comity, is a species of the genus.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

During his period of solitary confinement, Mr. Hamdan lost on the order of 50 pounds. While Respondent effected Mr. … During his period of solitary confinement, Mr. Hamdan lost on the order of 50 pounds.

Amicus Curiae Brief — FNU Tanzin, et al., Petitioners v. Muhammad Tanvir, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 12, 2020

Ctr., 192 F.3d 826, 834-835 (9th Cir. 1999) (noting, with respect to RFRA, that the court was “not writing on a clean slate” because “Congress has used the key phrase—‘acting under color of law’—before … In the United States’ view, the absence of congressional comment on that change should be viewed as evidence that Congress did not intend to work such a change.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Lewis v. Casey

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1996

Some experts credited it with maintaining “the only safe, clean, cost-effective prison system in the country. … The Ninth Circuit’s comment about relieving its own burden, id., at 1268, n. 6, is especially disturbing.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Leslie Rutledge, Attorney General of Arkansas, Petitioner v. Pharmaceutical Care Management Association

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 1, 2020

Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 96-97 (1983). … That may have been true in De Buono—although De 16 Buono “did not explicitly concern reporting requirements” and those requirements “drew no comment from the Court.” Self-Ins. Inst. of Am., Inc. v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Bank of America Nat. Trust and Sav. Assn. v. 203 North LaSalle Street Partnership

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999

ACREL’s mem- bership consists of over 800 attorneys from nearly every state and the District of Columbia who have concentrated their practice in real estate law for a period of ten years or more and … The Seventh Circuit opined that Congress incorpo- rated the new value exception when it drafted the Bank- ruptcy Code because, “[w]hen Congress amends the bankruptcy laws, it does not write ‘on a clean

Amicus Curiae Brief — Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Barber

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

Professor Morris made his prescient comments when punitive damages claims still were brought predominantly against defendant individuals for their intentional bad acts toward a specific person, such … App. 2d 689, 715 (1967) (plaintiff need not prove defendant acted with deliberate intent to harm plaintiff; plaintiff merely had to prove that the defendant acted recklessly and in wanton disregard

Amicus Curiae Brief — Pappas v. City of Las Vegas Downtown Redevelopment Agency

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

The Pappases presented evidence that “the Agency was acting as a front for the LLC.” Id. at 95a.’ … App. at 20a. 16 Although the Berman Court, in dicta, noted that the legislature may seek to make the “community ... beauti- ful as well as healthy, spacious as well as clean,” it did not hold that

Amicus Curiae Brief — Knick v. Twp. of Scott, 139 S. Ct. 50 (2018) (No. 17-647)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018

City and County of San Francisco, 545 U.S. 323 (2005) ................. 14-15 Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. United States, Se I i cccinicicninicinnetnieemntansiins 17 n.10 Searl v. School Dist. … The Williamson County ripening requirement has caused turmoil among property owners and consternation among lower courts and legal commentators, as this Court has been made aware by a host of petitions

Amicus Curiae Brief — Midwest Air Traffic Control Service, Inc., Petitioner v. Jessica T. Badilla, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 10, 2022

No. 21-867 In The MIDWEST AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE, INC., Petitioner, v. JESSICA T. BADILLA, ET AL. … In Africa, for example, the U.S. military has outsourced air reconnaissance operations to contractors.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Kentucky Assn. of Health Plans, Inc. v. Miller

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003

’ * This position has been taken by many of the legal commentators examining this issue. See: William J. … commentators on the American health care system de- scribe HMOs as a combination of insurer and provider.” Id. at 2161.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Barnett Bank of Marion Cty., NA v. Nelson

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1996

for accepting deposits during a period of insolvency. ) E . … Delta Air Lines, 463 U.S. 85, 96-97 (1983) (internal quota- tion marks omitted) ).