Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
2.57s
Oral argument — David Cocroft v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2014
And, of course, your comment, and this is tied in, and maybe I missed something earlier. … It shows a very clean lawn, and it shows a for sale sign. Mr. Cockcroft had the property up for sale. So there was absolutely no sign or evidence that the property was abandoned.
30 min of audioOral argument — Colbert v. Fontana P D
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 24, 2008
I think Smitty needs to be cleaned up, but it's okay. In this case, it doesn't really matter. This is not the case where it matters in my view. … , acts independently.
24 min of audioOral argument — Walker v. Harvard University Fellows
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 1, 2016
The plagiarism rule itself says all work submitted must be clean plagiarism, whether inadvertent plagiarism or not. Our point is not that this wasn't plagiarism. … Her testimony is that that is what she intended by the comment.
25 min of audioOral argument — Kansas City Southern Railway v. Sny Island Levee Drainage Dist
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 5, 2016
The CSX2, the Supreme Court's most recent pronouncement on the 4R's Act case, decided about 13 months ago, makes it very clear that there's two things that a plaintiff in a 4R's Act case has to show in … He did not just pick a number out of the air.
42 min of audioOral argument — The Estate of Valeria Tachiqui v. Stephanie Shavatt
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 12, 2017
But that Brown needed no pattern to show that it was an act by the city. … Well, the Fourth Circuit dealt with the time period in a very similar time period in the Wellham case, which I've cited, and that involved a 10-year period, and the court said that's too attenuated.
38 min of audioOral argument — Lyndon Pace v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 20, 2025
They are separate acts. … There's no other way in any case besides a very short set period of time.
50 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Akein Scott
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2017
If he thinks the basis of it was fraudulent inducement, which is basically what he's arguing, then he should have moved to revoke the plea, period. Your Honor, I... … You can look to the government's intent here, and no one has said that the government acted in bad faith. That's correct.
42 min of audioOral argument — Research Corp. v. Westport Ins. Corp.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 13, 2008
Count 1 is for breach of contract, and that is a clean breach of contract claim. … Ruzzi's comment was that that would – that was not covered by the contract. It was just – it was conversion of technical information.
40 min of audioOral argument — Vellali v. Yale University
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 25, 2024
So the error – your position is that the error was that comment the district court made that suggested you wouldn't have a breach when there's no loss. … You're right about that, and I would add that this is reviewed for plain air because plaintiffs didn't object to that.
45 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Matthew Poulin
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2015
That's not just plein air. … And even if it were plein air, in spite of the comments in Siegel about imposing a number of treatment conditions and the problems that could occur, there is yet to be any holding stating that that would
33 min of audioOral argument — FDIC v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2005
And that is what those people there believed, and they acted consistent with that. In the next bond period, when they gave the application, they indicated that they had not lost anything. … Given this piecing together after the fact, seven years down the road, the FDIC has to come up with acts to justify claiming that there was a discovery of dishonesty and loss during the policy period related
77 min of audioOral argument — Reed v. Nacogdoches County
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 5, 2023
We're talking about a period of 20 seconds between the two calls. … You do not start CPR on someone who has a faint pulse and who is gasping for air.
47 min of audioOral argument — Suzanne Wooten v. John Roach, Sr.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2020
When they are performing acts as an investigator, then I think that's what divides it regarding a grand jury. … That he entered the order of recusal and that he made a comment to the Texas lawyer. Those are the only allegations in the live complaint that's before this court.
47 min of audioOral argument — People v. Griffin
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 22, 2013
The judge did so by acting the way he did for that period of time, to the extent that based upon the failure to send notice, the judge effectively treated the order as a nullity. That's correct. … Counsel later on cleaned it up and put it in an affidavit from another codee saying the same thing, that Mr. Griffin wasn't there. What about the DNA? Was that additive?
43 min of audioOral argument — Lisa Romain v. Marketa Walters
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2017
It's never been used to outright deny fees or to justify that — that type of act. … Buckhannon said, no, we're going to clean this up. We're going straight to the plain language of what it means to be a prevailing party.
42 min of audioOral argument — United States v. George Naum, III
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 29, 2024
And it kind of shifted as to whether it was with a clean heart, if you will. I was doing, I was not putting the patients in a bad situation. … And to answer your question, Your Honor, this was a period of eight years. Dr. Naum worked part time at this clinic. Started out with 55 counts, 39 were severed.
58 min of audioOral argument — Scottsdale Insurance Company v. McGrath
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2022
But we think the issue for AIR was in shifting his focus to subpart A because, in our view, the more specific provision that specifically addressed a jointly – a co-owned joint venture should have controlled … I want to just very briefly, some comments from my opposing counsel on what he calls the first refusal letter.
38 min of audioOral argument — Consol Buchanan Mining Company v. Secretary of Labor
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 22, 2016
But these mainline water valves, there's no periodic testing of those that's required by the Act. Why wouldn't you do it? Why wouldn't you test it? … Your Honor, over the years, this is not a supermarket or a different place where things ought to be cleaned. This is a coal mine, so it's expected that there's dust and grime all over.
48 min of audioOral argument — United States v. William Godoy
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 12, 2025
How could it have been admissible as intrinsic evidence to demonstrate that there was an air of intimidation, control, threats that was a part of the scheme of controlling these individuals who were the … I believe he testified at trial, I would hear some comments about that, but again, then he would leave. So he really didn't have any concrete knowledge of that.
20 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Hussien Eltareb
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 13, 2020
But are you pursuing that argument, or are you just commenting? No, Your Honor, I was suggesting that this is not pursuing this argument. I was just commenting on this issue. … And there's punishment for that, which could involve cleaning up at a party or something to more severe. And that punishment presupposes that the Hells Angels prospect got caught.
30 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.