Documents

Oral argument — Aectra Refining v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2009

They require claimants to complete their claims within a period of time. That period of time is within three years in the date of exportation. … So in reality, the prospective provision for the effective date allows claimants to look back three years from the 2004 Trade Act to amend or jiggle with claims that are within that three-year period.

Oral argument — Hip Hop Beverage Corp. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2018

Well, I mean, did he just pick this date out of the air? I mean, is this an incompetent lawyer? I don't... Well... Are you blaming it on prior counsel? The date, yes. … And then six days into the limitations period, and not even considering the contradiction with the repeatedly pled discovery date of April 2012, just six days into the limitations period, pop, they became

Oral argument — Sillah v. Holder

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2007

There have been periods of ceasefire, followed by periods of violence, by ceasefires and then upsurges of violence again. … But Chen emphasized that under the Real ID Act, courts nevertheless lack jurisdiction, quote, when the petition for review essentially disputes the correctness of an IJ's factual finding.

Oral argument — People v. Church

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2017

They saw the undercover officers a few hours, a few days, during that two-week period before the 16th. … The trial court's comments were apt, and I would encourage this court to consider those comments as well. The evidence against Mr.

Oral argument — Armando Chagoya v. City of Chicago

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2020

And finally, that there was a significant time period when they were not required to have it at home. I mean, the city has decided to require it now. Totally, no debate there. … They're given time to inspect their equipment, to clean weapons.

Oral argument — Sky Harbor Atlanta Northeast v. Affiliated FM Insurance Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 16, 2024

It entered because the HVAC was malfunctioning and creating a negative air pressure environment that drew in that humidity. That humidity then soaks the drywall. You've got to replace the drywall. … We can't be found to have acted unreasonably under that set of facts.

Oral argument — United States v. Samuel Navarrette-Aguilar

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2015

reach the 1,000-gram threshold, or any weight threshold, if we were to expand this, necessary to establish a mandatory minimum sentence for the crime of a conspiracy to violate the Controlled Substances Act … We have to remember that the con- Pick out a thousand grams out of the air. There had to be some evidence. Right. And they didn't, the evidence that they had was overwhelming.

Oral argument — Kim v. Google LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 20, 2026

Now, again, that could mean that they were visiting either in the U.S. at the back half of the period or in Korea at the first half of the period. … My understanding is before the act or the speech at issue can be protected.

Oral argument — People of the State v. Sempra Energy Tradin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2008

You just say, I want $200, period. You don't say per megawatt hour. How is it any different? … And that is because the root principle is that Congress and the Federal Power Act wanted to draw this clean and bright line, the bright line easily ascertained between the federal jurisdiction over wholesale

Oral argument — Gillespie Community Unit School Dist. No 7. v. Union Pacific Railroad

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 8, 2011

Under Section 94 of the then Business Corporations Act, direct claims against Superior Coal were required to be brought within two years after its dissolution under the Survival Act period as it existed … But your honors, these are not, we're not writing on a clean slate here. I mean, these are the criteria that are very well recognized.

Oral argument — United States v. Mizrahi

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2025

Congress was particularly concerned about defendants passing themselves off as another, exercising authority on behalf of another or acting on behalf of another. … So I understand, yes, the name, it shouldn't have been done, but the treasurer was not exposed, didn't have any exposure to having to clean up his credit.

Oral argument — 1-19-2028

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2021

It will be current because under the freedom of information law, we would be required to produce this within a short period of time, five to 10 days. … It would apply with equal force to other requests under Freedom of Information Act for railway station footage.

Oral argument — Gerald Eitner v. Andrew Saul

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2021

Eitner has performed during the relevant period, which includes admitting walking half a mile on a flat surface, doing housework, he's doing weeding, mowing. … He's also taking care of his ailing mother, which includes driving her to appointments, cooking, cleaning, laundry. He even describes himself as her guardian at one point.

Oral argument — People v. Stumpf

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 3, 2011

He admits that he had been a user in the past, that he had not used any drugs for a long period of time. … When a defendant disposes of paraphernalia, that act shows exclusive dominion and control over it.

Oral argument — United States v. Mattia

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2004

Well I think that the government has clean hands your honor. All that was bargained for was eligibility and that's what was given to him. … There was no nothing that what we needed was the judge to make the recommendation that they go to Butner and then the Europrisons would act on that. I'm unaware.

Oral argument — United States v. Williams

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2022

getting into all these issues about filing late and the civil correspondence with the IRS about civil penalties, it does seem that that would confuse—I mean, I would actually think you'd want to put on a clean … Williams' personal involvement over this decade period with the IRS, you know, about his tax issues, the jury hears that, right? And they're able to, it's almost a rule of completeness problem.

Oral argument — United States v. HOWARD

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2004

But we- but we- and we did put in information from chief deputy and then acting Marshal Mositis as to this issue. … With respect to a point, Judge Schroeder, that you made, I think our position, of course, is you can't have a general policy, period. It has to be defendant-specific.

Oral argument — People v. Beard

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2020

He would have to know that the tip was reliable and not just a rumor in order for him to act on it such that he can delay a stop under reason. Again, if that's the only thing. … The conversation between the two chiefs is 90 seconds and then it takes a period of time for the dog to arrive. In my case, during that time, he was still writing the citations.

Oral argument — United States v. Charles Armour

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 22, 2015

So we still believe plein air is applicable to that condition because there was no objection to it, which is an easily anticipated objection. … We used your time, and I know you must have some comment that you'd like to advance at this time. You used my time productively, so I appreciate that.

Oral argument — People v. Gutman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2011

And if the court has no questions at this time, I will save the remainder of my comments for rebuttal. Thank you. … And as such, you don't pluck it out of the air and say, okay, she should pay $2 million and then reduce it to $1.2 million.