Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.46s
Amicus Curiae Brief — U.S. Army Corp of Eng'rs v. Hawkes Co., 136 S. Ct. 615 (2015) (No. 15-290)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Page(s) ee ceirenessmecseeenens 4, 6, 10, 15 DB Ee We crescccssnssemsemsemccecsesvscssenenenense ili Clean Water Act, Pub. L. … Chase, Comments of the Nat’ Ass'n of Counties Re: Definition of “Waters of the United States” Under the Clean Water Act 12 (Docket ID EPA-HQ-OW-2011 0880-15504) (Nov. 14, 2014), .....000..-. eee
Amicus Curiae Brief — PUD No. 1 of Jefferson Cty. v. Washington Dept. of Ecology
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
The Washington Supreme Court’s Decision Misinterprets State Authority Under § 401 Of The Clean Water Act... 7 1. … The Washington Supreme Court’s Decision Mis- interprets State Authority Under § 401 Of The Clean Water Act.
511 U.S. 700Amicus Curiae Brief — Pacific Gas and Electric Co. v. San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace (No. 06-466)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
To allow for pub- lic participation, the regulations require a draft, a comment period, and a final EIS that addresses comments received. 40 C.F.R. § 1502.9. … For example, agency actions pursuant to the Clean Air Act, are by statute deemed not to constitute “major federal actions” for NEPA purposes, 15 U.S.C. § 793(c)(1), although the Environmental Protection
Amicus Curiae Brief — Meghrig v. KFC Western, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1995
Second Session e p.18: The Committee drew on the similar provisions of the Clean Air Act of 1970 and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972. … As discussed, supra, the history makes clear that the RCRA citizen suit provision is based upon the comparable 30 provisions of the Clean Air Act.
515 U.S. 1192Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 27, 2026
Dep’t of the Air Force, 128 F. 4th 1089 (9th Cir. 2025), cert. granted sub nom. Dep’t of the Air Force v. Prutehi Guahan, 146 S. … Beginning in 1987, the Department of Energy (DOE) and the EPA worked with Washington State to start cleaning up the Hanford Site.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 7, 2024
The Clean Air Act authorizes EPA to waive preemption only if California “needs” its own standards to address a “compelling and extraordinary” problem in California. … Fish and Wildlife Service under the Endangered Species Act. 520 U.S. at 158-59.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Rapanos v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
Congress recognize that protection of the integrity of aquatic ecosystems demanded broad fed- * £.g., Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401-7671q; Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300f to 300j-26; Endangered … ® See EPA's Clean Air Budget and the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Budget: Hearing Before the Subcomm. on Clean Air, Wetlands, Private Property, and Nuclear Safety of the Senate Comm. on Environment
546 U.S. 932Amicus Curiae Brief — Joslyn Manufacturing Co. v. James
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
SE h'n-b GLH nlkk-r 0 0009408 b R60 54064 ORO OS® 3 Statutes: Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7601 ef seq. ......... 15 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compen- sation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 960i … Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7601 ef seq. 16 conflict among the courts of appeals, (2) the possibility that the issue may have limited importance in many cases, and (3) the fact-specific nature of the inquiry
498 U.S. 1108Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 23, 2023
US Airways, Inc., 589 F.3d 30, 36-37 (1st Cir. 2009); Air Line Pilots Ass’n v. … As petitioners explain, the court of appeals suggested that Coal Act premiums “ ‘accrue for each tax period.’ ” Pet. 22 (quoting Sunnyside, 146 F.3d at 1279).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Leslie Salt Co. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
So Be DD seca cee eee 14 STATUTES Administrative Procedure Act © Ee etns: escenario 12 Clean Water Act 2. … ‘‘Federal waters’ ju- risdiction over the land surface would be defined by 11 the whim of birds in the air.
498 U.S. 1126Amicus Curiae Brief — Huebner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985
II THE PLAIN LANGUAGE OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT EXEMPTS FROM REGULATION ACTIVITIES SUCH AS THOSE PERFORMED BY THE HUEBNERS Section 404(f) of the Clean Water Act, codified at 33 U.S.C. § 1344(f), provides … III CONGRESS INTENDED THE AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS TO THE CLEAN WATER ACT TO APPLY TO A FULL RANGE OF AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITIES Although the piain language of the exemptions to the Clean Water Act leaves
474 U.S. 817Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 6, 2022
See Chevron, 467 U.S. at 843-48 (EPA had delegated authority to interpret statutory term “major stationary sources” of air pollution, in Clean Air Act, either broadly or narrowly). … Specifically, in Chevron, unlike here, Congress provided a generally defined term of art--“major stationary sources” of air pollution--and the EPA had the delegated authority, under the Clean Air Act,
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 20, 2025
Kayla Solomon, Mayor Harris, Mayor Young comment on possible National Guard deployment, FOX13 (Sept. 11, 2025), https://www.fox13memphis.com/news/mayor-harris-mayor-young-comment-onpossible-national-guard-deployment … Army and Air Force.
Amicus Curiae Brief — McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1995
United Air Lines, Inc., 728 F.2d 614, 624 (4th Cir.) … evi- dence prior to what would otherwise be the end of the backpay period in the absence of the allegedly “unlawful acts and this litigation.”
513 U.S. 352Amicus Curiae Brief — Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2013
Duke Energy Corp., this Court addressed the Fourth Circuit’s claim that it did not invalidate the EPA’s Prevention of Signifi- cant Deterioration (“PSD”) regulations under the Clean Air Act (“CAA”) … If this Court does not reverse the decision below, one commentator has suggested that it could call into doubt countless other Clean Water Act exemptions, such as those found within the agricultural
568 U.S. 1118Amicus Curiae Brief — SL Service, Inc. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
-flag commercial cargo vessels qualified to operate in Jones Act trades. … , cleaning of the drydock following repairs, among numerous others.
543 U.S. 1034Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 3, 2025
air, clean and safe water, and healthy public lands. … Air Act granting the State of California authority to impose its own emission standards.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 31, 2025
Code § 48.43.073 ................................... 13 iv Other Authorities California Air Resources Board, Clean Air Act § 209(b) Waiver Support Document (May 2012) ................................. … California Air Resources Board, Clean Air Act § 209(b) Waiver Support Document 2, 6, 16 (May 2012), https://tinyurl.com/3ca8mf7s.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Islander East East Pipeline Pipeline Co., LLC v. McCarthy (No. 08-367)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008
a casmeonee 17 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq.... 8 a spiapuctiuie 8 rad cecintacreninbinbtedeuvesones (i), passim ET SE ea (i), passim ES 9,10 Energy Policy Act of 2005, Pub. L. … The Clean Water Act Among other things, the CWA is designed to “re- store and maintain the chemical, physical, and bio- logical integrity of the Nation’s waters.” 33 U.S.C. § 1251(a).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Joslyn Manufacturing Co. v. James
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
errr ror rrr Terre rr Te Tee 3 Statutes: Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7601 ef seq. ......... 15 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compen- sation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 9601 ef BR gc cn Chix … Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7601 ef seq. 16 conflict among the courts of appeals, (2) the possibility that the issue may have limited importance in many cases, and (3) the fact-specific nature of the inquiry
498 U.S. 1108
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.