Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.39s
Opposition Brief — Wallace v. Kern
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1974
Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970). … Fla., Jan. 24, 1973, No. 71-561 Civ. T-K).
414 U.S. 1135Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Shenker v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1963
Local 50, American Bake Confectionery Workers, 294 F. 2d 399 (24 Ur. 1961) Affirmed, 370 P. S. . Ellis v. Union Pacific R. Co., 329 US. 649 (1947) .. Harris v. Pennsylvania R. … Local 50, A n Bakery & Confectionery Workers, 294 F.2d 399 (2d Cir. 1961), af- firmed 370 U.S. ..... (1962); R.C., 51 Harv. L. Rev. 1287 (1931).
374 U.S. 1Amicus Curiae Brief — McQueen v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental Control
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
Nelson, 303 S.C. 102, 399 S.E.2d 24 (Ct. App. 1990) .................0..06+. 12 Kaiser Aetna v. United States, 444 U.S. 164 (1979) ....17 Lite House, Inc. v. J.C. … Nelson, 303 S.C. 102, 104, 399 S.E.2d 24, 25 (Ct. App. 1990). 12 the presumptions of title and navigability against McQueen on remand.
540 U.S. 982Opposition Brief — Lynn Hamlet, Petitioner v. Officer Hoxie
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Oct 27, 2023
Pet. 23–24. … McKnight, 521 U.S. 399, 415 (1997) (Scalia, J., dissenting, joined by Rehnquist, C.J., Thomas, and Kennedy, JJ.) (citing Williams v. Adams, 85 Mass. 171 (1861)).
Supreme Court brief · Motion to affirm · Oct 20, 2025
Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006) ........................................ 23 Thornburg v. … Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 441 (2006) (“[T]he problem here is entirely of the State’s own making.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Secretary, Dept. of Education v. Felton
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1984
Supp. 399 (S.D. Ohio), aff'd, 409 = * 808 FR en Seer tes Wolman v. … Board of Education, 330 U.S. at 21-24 (Jackson, J., dissenting).
469 U.S. 878Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Luis Alberto Ruiz-Dominguez, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 2, 2018
Law Bulletin Art. 6 (2007) ......ccccccceeccesessesseeseeeeeees 24 iv TABLE OF CITATIONS Page CASES Beckles v. United States, 137 S. … On January 24, 2017, the district court sentenced him to 63 months’ imprisonment followed by a three-year term of supervised release. Mr.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. v. Regal-Beloit Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2010
Sept. 24, 2008)................... 13 Trailer Marine Transport Corp. v. Federal Maritime Comm., 602 F.2d 379 (D.C. Cir. BR arc Sees EAL, Nd a SA A 15 U.S. v. … ll 104, 24 Stat. 379] does not apply to the transportation of passengers from a foreign country to a point in the United States. To this there are two answers.
559 U.S. 989Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Crabtree v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1986
Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30 (1970) .........eeeeeeeee a?) … Lowisiana, 399 U.S. 30 (1970).
479 U.S. 852Opposition Brief — Aguilar v. County of Los Angeles
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1985
Hospital, t al., 97 F.R.D. 24 (C.D.Cal. 1983) 4, 5, 10, 11, 13, 14, 18, 19 Potomac Electric Power Co. v. … Jefferson National Bank of Miami Beach, 442 F.2d 394, 399-400 (5th Cir. 1971) [same as Potomac]; Schutten v. Shell Oil Company, 421 F.2d 869, 875 (5th Cir. 1970) [same]; Jamison v.
471 U.S. 1125Amicus Curiae Brief — Gill v. Whitford, 138 S. Ct. 52 (2017) (No. 16-1161)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006)......................0 8, 9, 11, 14, 23 McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Comm’n, Sa ctciinlindcenpnbaniieel 5 Miller v. … Counsel for Amicus Curiae April 24, 2017
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1969
B, infra, pp. 24-30) are reported at 10 F.C.C, 2d 718 and at 11.R. R. 2d.771. The opinions of the court of appeals (App. C, a i «pp. 32-49) are not yet reported. … CC. ‘2d 399-400). The second oven which oceurred after the re- ‘mand order in this ease, was ‘the voluntary with- Pa drawal of the-successful applicant RAETA (App. 3, 38).
396 U.S. 888Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016
De Grandy, 512 U.S. 997 (1994)......... 20, 24 League of United Latin Am. Citizens (LULAC) v. Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006).........0...cccceeeeeeeeeee 2, 13, 20 Metro Broad., Inc. v. … Bart- lett, 556 U.S. at 24.
Opposition — Vittitow v. Kentucky
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1975
Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970) ..000cucedenene eee 18 Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 405 U.S. 443 (IGE) ..ccesedecduaueeneee 18 Department of Mental I1ygiene v. … Commonwealth, K’y., DUS S.W. 24 275 (1957) ....cccccccccccccccece 15 Wombles v. Commonwealth, Ky., S17 S.W. 24 16D (1958) ....cccccccccccece coos 13 Young v.
423 U.S. 834Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993
615-964-399? 202-775-8786 Attorneys for Amici Curiae No. … LEXIS 506 (September 24, 1993). This is not an isolated incident.
510 U.S. 1023Respondents Brief — United States v. La Franca
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1931
(2nd) 399. The amount sought to be recovered is $2,042.18 (R. 5). This sum is made up of several items. These items will be discussed in order. … Under those acts, Congress FA aot CELT a 24 made it a crime to ship liquor into a dry state or territory.
282 U.S. 568Opposition Brief — James F. Waters, Inc. v. Commissioner
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1947
No. 399, 79th Cong., Ist Sess., pp. … No. 399, 79th Cong., 1st Sess. (pp. 1-2).
332 U.S. 767Brief for the United States — Almeida-Sanchez v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1973
United States, 848 F. 2d ¥: District of Columbia, 218 A. 24 607 ¢ aa ask whee z ‘Ritibiedlt de saleevesk-dhacks have hote States V. … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 51.
413 U.S. 266Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1950
Stulman-Emrick Lumber Co., 147 F. 2d 399 (2d Cir. 1945), cert. denied 325 U. S. 861 (1945) ............eeeees McLean Trucking Co. v. … Stulman-Emrick Lumber Co., 147 F. 2d 399 (C. A. 2), cert. denied 325 U. S. 861; Walling v. Richmond ‘'crew Anchor Co., 154 F. 2d 780 (C.
340 U.S. 823Amicus Curiae Brief — Mordechai Korf, et al., Petitioners v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 20, 2022
See id. at 24. … United States, 524 U.S. 399, 410 (1998). * * * The use of filter teams fundamentally and unnecessarily intrudes on criminal defendants’ attorney- 24 client privilege and work product doctrine, and
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.