Documents

Oral argument — knollenberg v. harmoniic, inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 17, 2005

Huddleston, the Supreme Court said the Securities Act's remedies in the 33 Act and the 34 Act are cumulative. They don't preclude one another. You add them up together. … They quote, Harmonic shares declined over 20% today due to comments from their 10Q filed last night.

Oral argument — Cynthia Madej v. Jeff Maiden

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 22, 2019

The district court dismissed the Americans with Disabilities Act and Fair Housing Act claims based on its application of a toxic tort causation standard that's directly at odds with the remedial purpose … Malott, her proffered expert, examined her outside for only a two-hour period.

Oral argument — United States v. Jeremias Sanchez-Velasco

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 13, 2019

So we wanted to clean up that record based upon the unlawfully obtained information. Thank you, Your Honor. Thank you. Mr. … Cole, we note you were appointed under the Criminal Justice Act and the court appreciates your assistance. Ms. Neidl. Good morning. My name is Emily Neidl.

Oral argument — United States v. Mattia

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2004

Well I think that the government has clean hands your honor. All that was bargained for was eligibility and that's what was given to him. … There was no nothing that what we needed was the judge to make the recommendation that they go to Butner and then the Europrisons would act on that. I'm unaware.

Oral argument — United States v. Mizrahi

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2025

Congress was particularly concerned about defendants passing themselves off as another, exercising authority on behalf of another or acting on behalf of another. … So I understand, yes, the name, it shouldn't have been done, but the treasurer was not exposed, didn't have any exposure to having to clean up his credit.

Oral argument — Gerald Eitner v. Andrew Saul

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2021

Eitner has performed during the relevant period, which includes admitting walking half a mile on a flat surface, doing housework, he's doing weeding, mowing. … He's also taking care of his ailing mother, which includes driving her to appointments, cooking, cleaning, laundry. He even describes himself as her guardian at one point.

Oral argument — 1-19-2028

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2021

It will be current because under the freedom of information law, we would be required to produce this within a short period of time, five to 10 days. … It would apply with equal force to other requests under Freedom of Information Act for railway station footage.

Oral argument — People v. Stumpf

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 3, 2011

He admits that he had been a user in the past, that he had not used any drugs for a long period of time. … When a defendant disposes of paraphernalia, that act shows exclusive dominion and control over it.

Oral argument — Licci v. American Express Bank Ltd.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2020

It says it refers to undated press releases, interviews with unidentified individuals, and unidentified websites, and it doesn't provide any comment as whatever as to what was said in those. … It does not say that all of these entities, and certainly didn't say at the time, in the 2004 and 2006 period, at the time, that these were known to be Hezbollah-related entities.

Oral argument — Connecticut v. Exxon Mobil Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 23, 2022

Asking consumers how much gas would you have bought if Exxon hadn't aired a certain commercial? … And so in some of these other cases, like the nuisance cases, where we have made in the alternative an argument about complete preemption, it's because we think that the Clean Air Act is like the statutes

Oral argument — United States v. Eric Scott

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 28, 2018

They can have people come in and testify we had drugs over this period of time and that. … Your Honor, I have a… I mean, you could have tried this thing on that first indictment and kept it clean. Well, but this is… That's… But here's, all right, and here's what happens.

Oral argument — People v. Main

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 25, 2024

We're asking to look at it in plain air. That's correct. Okay. I went to Supreme Court Rule 63C1A, talking about recusal. … They go to the meeting with that comment.

Oral argument — Chheng V.Atty Gen USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2012

And I think it's something that can only be commented upon by an expert in an informed... … We're not going to pick that virus-diseased kidney over a clean kidney.

Oral argument — Palmer v. Jones

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2014

Subsequently, because of a petition to revoke the plea agreement of Bob Kochenauer, he was given a second chance to come clean and cooperate with the Attorney General for the State of Illinois and he participated … Kopenhauer and Edward Jones and Dwight Erskine together, acting in concert, to defraud her of her money.

Oral argument — Michael Livingston v. SC Dept. of Social Services

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2021

In South Carolina, we have the Tort Claims Act, which covers DSS as a state agency. … They refer to comments made by one DSS attorney and some allegedly racist comments made by a DSS caseworker. I think those are wholly irrelevant here.

Oral argument — Galina Medvedeva v. City of Kirkland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2017

Yeah, the, the, the inference, though, is in one situation you're saying she shut the bathroom door as an act to physically resist the police coming into the bathroom. … The water was already cleaned up. It was already stopped.

Oral argument — Velma Olu-Cole v. E.l. Haynes Public Charter Sc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2018

consequences that have not been redressed and the defendant is not disavowing its legal position, but in fact in the very case is continuing to litigate and asking a court to decide its legal entitlement not to clean … They went with the change in placement process, scheduling it for January as an intentional and purposeful act. I see that I'm out of time. Thank you, Your Honors. Thank you.

Oral argument — United States v. HOWARD

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2004

But we- but we- and we did put in information from chief deputy and then acting Marshal Mositis as to this issue. … With respect to a point, Judge Schroeder, that you made, I think our position, of course, is you can't have a general policy, period. It has to be defendant-specific.

Oral argument — United States v. Williams

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2022

getting into all these issues about filing late and the civil correspondence with the IRS about civil penalties, it does seem that that would confuse—I mean, I would actually think you'd want to put on a clean … Williams' personal involvement over this decade period with the IRS, you know, about his tax issues, the jury hears that, right? And they're able to, it's almost a rule of completeness problem.

Oral argument — Aectra Refining v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2009

They require claimants to complete their claims within a period of time. That period of time is within three years in the date of exportation. … So in reality, the prospective provision for the effective date allows claimants to look back three years from the 2004 Trade Act to amend or jiggle with claims that are within that three-year period.