Documents

Oral argument — Thomas Simstad v. Gerald Scheub

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 25, 2015

Well, maybe the court thought that you were not coming with entirely clean hands when you could have sped things along yourself. … So you have this time period from 1996 to 2005, where everything's fine. I just don't see how they overcome that, especially when Mr.

Oral argument — Murray v. Alaska Airlines, Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2008

The differences are significant because in the court action, there's a much more extended period of time available. … First of all, this is the whistleblower statute, Federal Act, right? Right. This is not an invitation to a high school dance.

Oral argument — VDX Distro v. FDA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 6, 2026

I'm going to address the notice and comment issue. As Mr. … Well, they made the argument that notice and comment is required, and this is a subsidiary reason and a rebuttal reason why notice and comment is required here.

Oral argument — Howard Smallwood v. Don Williams

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2022

The Prison Litigation Reform Act only requires prisoners to exhaust administrative remedies that are available. … The Prison Rape Elimination Act is clear. Prisoner can't be required to informally resolve an incident of sexual abuse.

Oral argument — Shelby County v. Holder

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 27, 2013

Your time is about ready to expire for the rebuttal period, but I do have this question. … What Congress did — Congress in 2006 was not riding on a clean slate. The judgment had been made of what the coverage formula ought to be in 1965.

Oral argument — Frank Cheatham v. City of Phoenix

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 11, 2017

The nacho cheese machine was cleaned up. The pretzel jar never came back. … Was it inappropriate for Cheatham to comment on this? No, it was not inappropriate. Why is it not inappropriate for him to comment on this? Why is it not inappropriate for Chief Cheatham to comment?

Oral argument — David Mulholland,etal V.Thomas Jefferson University Hospital Inc,etal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2012

I don't know the answer as a lay person, and I think it's something that can only be commented upon by an expert in an informed case. … Your Honor, the Affidavit of Merit statute did any action for damages for personal injuries, wrongful death, or property damage resulting from an alleged act of malpractice or negligence by a licensed

Oral argument — Armando Chagoya v. City of Chicago

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2020

And finally, that there was a significant time period when they were not required to have it at home. I mean, the city has decided to require it now. Totally, no debate there. … They're given time to inspect their equipment, to clean weapons.

Oral argument — Broadspring, Inc. v. Congoo, L

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2017

And then eventually, you know, they had to come clean. … I'm going to repeat the second comment. Yeah. The amount is $35,014,000. We're talking about depositions and remainders. And if we want to find out that number specifically, we can ask you both.

Oral argument — Petersen Energia Inversora, S.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 15, 2017

So during the entire time period that the plaintiffs are complaining about here, Your Honor, YPF is not actually acting—is not the majority shareholder. … If they had said that, then I imagine this would only be proceeding in Spain or in Buenos Aires. Why didn't they? Well.

Oral argument — United States v. John Scantlebury

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2019

So it would be a sanction in the air. … together, get a new prosecutor on the case and within the time period go after this person.

Oral argument — United States v. Erickson Meko Campbell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2017

You can see the puffs of air. Your Honor also would have noticed that Deputy McCannon suggested that Mr. … And that was a reasonable period of time. So if the touchstone of the Fourth Amendment is – Had to talk to him to get the information to put in the document. Yes.

Oral argument — United States v. LEICHNER

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2006

But for a period of time, probably at least two or three years, there were a number of legitimate investments which the records disclosed. So it looks to me, at least, as if Mr. … Could you comment just a little bit on the argument that the loss calculation is wrong because for a number of years it was a legitimate business genuinely investing its investors' money?

Oral argument — Palmer v. Jones

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2014

Subsequently, because of a petition to revoke the plea agreement of Bob Kochenauer, he was given a second chance to come clean and cooperate with the Attorney General for the State of Illinois and he participated … Kopenhauer and Edward Jones and Dwight Erskine together, acting in concert, to defraud her of her money.

Oral argument — Joseph Wagner v. Lisa Scheirer

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 20, 2024

Wagner's feedlot is regulated by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency pursuant to an NPDES permit issued under the Clean Water Act. Mr. … And that comment was a heads-up to an individual, Greta Gauthier-Sheaves, legislative liaison. The agency has received calls from state legislators on Mr. Wagner's behalf in the past.

Oral argument — Gallagher v. The Union Square Condominium Homeowners Association

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 19, 2010

, further the purpose of the act, that is to encourage owners to keep a clean pathway, let's say? … Was there any case cited to the legislative debates or comments made by the legislators concerning the passage or the intent of this statute? No.

Oral argument — Dane Chisholm Reid Liniger v. Saint Marys City School District

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 17, 2019

And this is in the sex harassment policy, and it didn't come out of thin air. I understand. … Or don't act manly. Don't act manly. The difficulty I have with that, I can see that if he said you can't play football if you wear lipstick. That would fit more clearly.

Oral argument — State of Kansas v. SourceAmerica

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 28, 2020

Military personnel are generally precluded from performing many cafeteria operations concerning cleaning and sanitizing tasks required to prepare and serve safe and high-quality food to the troops. … Would it be possible for me to offer one comment to that? Sure.

Oral argument — United States v. Timothy Burns

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 21, 2020

All across the board, happy to admit that, but let's take your comments in order. … And he says, I purchased these things through Global Aquaponics, which was the 51 percent mother company, and I have not cleaned up the purchases to get the securities name.

Oral argument — Russell Pontinen v. United States Steel Corporati

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2021

I think the district court also wrongfully concluded that Pontinen's comments to Ms. … Number one, the district court failed to cite any specific comments that Mr.