Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.50s
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; State of Colorado; Credible Evidence
Federal Register · Rule · Jun 30, 2003
This action is being taken under section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
68 FR 38633Environmental Protection AgencyTribal code · Tribal code
Such changes are not subject to any requirements under title IV of the Clean Air Act and are not modifications under title I of the Clean Air Act; 12 1.15.1.3. … The engine or turbine replacement is not subject to any requirements under Title IV of the Clean Air Act and is not a modification under Title I of the Clean Air Act; 16 2.3.1.2.
Federal Register · Rule · May 25, 1999
Comm. on Energy and Commerce, Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, H. … Similarly, the Clean Air Act Amendments (Pub.
64 FR 28250RuleEnvironmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Nov 19, 2002
All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
67 FR 69688Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · May 9, 2014
The EPA has determined that Washington's January 30, 2014 submittal meets all Clean Air Act requirements for approval. … We have made the determination that this action is consistent with section 110 of the Clean Air Act.
79 FR 26628Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 3, 2003
Title V Requirements 62.14830 Does this subpart require me to obtain an operating permit under title V of the Clean Air Act? … See sections 129(e), 503(c), 503(d), and 502(a) of the Clean Air Act.
68 FR 57518Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 11, 1998
The intended effect of approving this rule is to regulate emissions of NOX in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.
63 FR 42721Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Indiana Source-Specific Revisions
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 29, 2000
EPA intends to provide the State a reasonable period of time to devise and submit a plan that fully meets the Clean Air Act requirements for attainment, before taking further action to address the problem … Air Act.
65 FR 52315Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 25, 2003
Santa Barbara attained the 1-hour ozone NAAQS in 1999 and SBCAPCD adopted a 2001 Clean Air Plan (“2001 CAP”) on November 15, 2001, to address the Clean Air Act (CAA) section 175A provisions relating to … Air Act.
68 FR 14382Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Minnesota
Federal Register · Rule · Jul 1, 2005
Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period will be marked “late.” … National Technology Transfer Advancement Act In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
70 FR 38025Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Sep 29, 2016
Statutory and Executive Orders Review Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
81 FR 66823Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Nov 3, 1999
These revisions were made to comply with the regulations set forth in the Clean Air Act (CAA). … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period.
64 FR 59633Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 8, 1999
The Clean Air Act sets forth a number of SIP requirements for states with areas designated as nonattainment for the CO NAAQS. … EPA's authority to approve removal of a state's oxyfuel program is set forth at Clean Air Act section 211(m)(6).
64 FR 54851Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jun 2, 2023
During this period, no comments were received. … Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act and applicable Federal regulations
88 FR 36251Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 7, 2002
EPA is approving this revision to the SIP in accordance with the Clean Air Act. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
67 FR 62381Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plan; Alaska
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 14, 2007
The revisions were submitted in accordance with the requirements of section 110 of the Clean Air Act (hereinafter the Act or CAA). … Response to Comments EPA provided a 30-day review and comment period and solicited comments on our proposal published in the February 5, 2007, Federal Register .
72 FR 45378Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court brief · Response to application from Power Company Respondents · Aug 19, 2024
Pallone noting “[t]hese ‘existing authorities’ include [Clean Air Act] Section 111”). … It provided an extended 75-day comment period as well as a supplemental comment period. 88 Fed.
Supreme Court brief · Response to application from Power Company Respondents · Aug 19, 2024
Pallone noting “[t]hese ‘existing authorities’ include [Clean Air Act] Section 111”). … It provided an extended 75-day comment period as well as a supplemental comment period. 88 Fed.
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 26, 2005
The SIP revision, redesignation request and maintenance plan are approvable because they satisfy the requirements of the Clean Air Act (Act). … IDEM submitted a supplement to its submission on August 11, 2005, indicating that the State's public comment period concluded on July 29, 2005, and that no comments were received.
70 FR 56129Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 26, 2013
We are proposing to approve this revision because it satisfies the applicable requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) with respect to RACT for the Missouri portion of the St. … 3 Under section 183(b), EPA is required to periodically review and, as necessary, update CTGs.
78 FR 45112Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.