Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Calvin Bernhardt

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2018

What we have here is one person telling another, in virtually identical language, in a very short period of time, to not talk to police. Both of the requests are identical. … We determined, though, in trial that we already had a pretty clean case going forward. There was no need to call her.

Oral argument — Scottsdale Insurance Company v. McGrath

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2022

But we think the issue for AIR was in shifting his focus to subpart A because, in our view, the more specific provision that specifically addressed a jointly – a co-owned joint venture should have controlled … I want to just very briefly, some comments from my opposing counsel on what he calls the first refusal letter.

Oral argument — United States v. Evelyn Sineneng-Smith

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 18, 2017

So it's materially different because she wasn't giving advice at all on the I-140 petition, period. Who knows how the law had changed or not. … It says, the government must show that the defendant acted with criminal intent, i.e., that's a violation of the statute. That's a mandatory requirement.

Oral argument — United States v. Gregory Warren

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 3, 2018

The evidence showed that Watts wanted this docket cleaned up. But here's where the problem came. The deadline started rolling on. … But once they negotiated the $2.3 billion settlement, because that was always going to be up in the air, how much is this going to be worth?

Oral argument — Huntleigh USA v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2007

So we say the fact that the contracts were for a period of time subject to termination doesn't affect them. … So the airlines couldn't use Huntley after the act. Huntley's gone.

Oral argument — Goldring v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 3, 2021

And you kept the ball, you big IRS, kept the ball in the air for how many years while today? Your Honor, the IRS did not keep the ball in the air. … The use of money principle applies per period, and that's the holding in Avon, which is consistent with the outcome here.

Oral argument — People v. Minor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 23, 2019

His drugs were clean. Perhaps most importantly, he was to obtain drug treatment. He underwent not just one, but two separate drug programs, and he satisfactorily completed those. … He was acting under a serious misapprehension here as to the conduct for which he was sentencing this individual.

Oral argument — People v. Hawkins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2012

, the danger there is the jury would have thought, well, okay, defense counsel was floating up a balloon as to what he might have possibly said, but then the defendant doesn't back it up and then the air … There'd be periods of moments when he sat and said nothing, and then periods of moments where he was musing as to what happened.

Oral argument — Charles Plymail v. Patrick Mirandy

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2021

Lee, that enforcing, applying the plain air standard. Before you go too much further down the procedural default argument, I think it's a great argument. It's just not one you made beloved. … They didn't comment on it, but it wasn't part of the holding at all. It was a throwaway. They probably didn't comment on it, didn't make a hold of it, because you didn't raise it.

Oral argument — Arapahoe County Public Airport v. FAA

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2021

In particular, the new Bronco arrival procedure, which we outline in our briefs, shifts the air traffic from the northeast to areas further north and then west of the airport. … FAA took comment not only on the draft EA, but also on the final EA. And there are 1000s of pages in the record in which FAA accepted and responded to comments.

Oral argument — EEOC v. AutoZone, Incorporated

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 30, 2015

Zisch had been trained by her manager to step in as acting store manager. In fact she had successfully done that for two or three months when he was out. … And when she finally, two years down the road, after multiple trips back and forth and some periods of no restrictions and other periods of different restrictions, finally the doctor said this is it.

Oral argument — United States v. Rashad Woodside

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2018

We can just pluck it out of the air? Well, I think when you look at the rules, Rule 35 and Rule 43, it kind of gives this court some parameters to work with. … I see that you're appointed under the Criminal Justice Act, and I appreciate your effort. We appreciate your participating under that act. Thank you. Thank you. I appreciate you having me.

Oral argument — Kyle Halle v. Galliano Marine Service, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2017

But a janitor that's cleaning it all up, he'd be exempt too, right? Well, that's where the cases have gone because his job is the boat. Right? I mean, he's maintaining upkeeping the boat. … Therefore, due to the limited crew and long periods of time offshore, it was not possible to spread this work to other employees at all, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Pro-Life Mississippi v. Lindsay Horton, et

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2015

And how many threats to your plaintiff people, and how many not threats, but actual arrests during this period of time? … The police said they were acting reasonably. They say they weren't acting reasonably. You say, well, the record shows that they were acting reasonably.

Oral argument — Sticka v. Casserino

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2004

Let's say that the actual title isn't going to be transferred to me because it's being held in trust during the period that I'm signing off on this contract. … Sticker did not make a motion to assume this lease within the 60-day period. At that time, the lease was rejected. That is, it's no longer estate property.

Oral argument — Feldman v. Commissioner IRS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 20, 2005

But you're acting like there's nothing in between. If it said the Secretary will relieve such individual of such liability, then I think you might have something. … And for a period of time, he was making substantially less than $130,000.

Oral argument — United States v. Tammy Thomas

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2009

Thomas' statements about her – because her comments about Arnold had nothing to do with Balco. And we're not saying the Court didn't have jurisdiction over all of them. … As a result of her striking appearance, during the time period it was proven that she received nerbolithone from Arnold, the evidence showed she knowingly used steroids.

Oral argument — Ronnie Bowling v. Randy White

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2017

I'd like to just clean up one factual issue and then make three quick points. The first, in response to something that Judge Gibbons said, is Mr. … Their decision, their offhand comment that he was entitled to that credit, was merrily repeating what the district court had said in the order certifying the question.

Oral argument — EPIC v. Ann Carlson

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 27, 2020

Now the plain language of the D4 category not only shows that it's inapplicable but the comment period for the rule never indicated anything of the scope of a timber sale and rather it said it was for … So, and then the goes on to say the forest service will come back later and clean it up. So what this showing is this is a commercial timber sale.

Oral argument — Pan Am Railways, Inc. v. US Department of Labor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 5, 2017

And I think I should appropriately keep my comments focused on the punitive damages issue. The amount. Then the amount. … It's not about cleaning up the ice. Excuse me, he said this is required by the collective bargaining agreement. There's a perfect response for that.