Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.18s
Oral argument — Kyle Halle v. Galliano Marine Service, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2017
But a janitor that's cleaning it all up, he'd be exempt too, right? Well, that's where the cases have gone because his job is the boat. Right? I mean, he's maintaining upkeeping the boat. … Therefore, due to the limited crew and long periods of time offshore, it was not possible to spread this work to other employees at all, Your Honor.
42 min of audioOral argument — 23-1290_23-1299_NLRB v. Colart_Staff Mgmt
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 30, 2024
Why isn't the significance of cases like Starbucks or Lancaster-Fairfield County Hospital, or the Fourth Circuit's decision in LRB versus air contact transport, that there is a different standard for the … What do we do with the board's footnote five where it indicates, even if Hargrove was not actually engaged in constricted activity, that Colart apparently thought that he was and that Trejo's comments
47 min of audioOral argument — People v. Hawkins
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2012
, the danger there is the jury would have thought, well, okay, defense counsel was floating up a balloon as to what he might have possibly said, but then the defendant doesn't back it up and then the air … There'd be periods of moments when he sat and said nothing, and then periods of moments where he was musing as to what happened.
29 min of audioOral argument — Glen Armstrong, Sr. v. BNSF Railway Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2017
First of all, Your Honor, it is a safety whistleblower statute, more akin to the Aviation Investment Reform Act, also called Air 21. Right, but all of these statutes require a retaliatory motive. … If there's no questions, I'll save my additional comments for rebuttal. All right, thank you, Mr. Motley. Thank you. Mr. Ballinon? Thank you.
27 min of audioOral argument — Pro-Life Mississippi v. Lindsay Horton, et
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2015
And how many threats to your plaintiff people, and how many not threats, but actual arrests during this period of time? … The police said they were acting reasonably. They say they weren't acting reasonably. You say, well, the record shows that they were acting reasonably.
46 min of audioOral argument — Abbott v. Commissioner IRS
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2005
All in this relatively short period of time. Is there any suggestion that what he was paid effectively did? Yes, Your Honor. Oh. What, what, how did you show that? … There were clean hearts. I'm not suggesting that. The implication of my question, so it's clear, is this.
29 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Ralph Tovar
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 27, 2025
One of them says Hobbs act jurisdiction. Another says travel act jurisdiction. I think those formulations are all doing what Torres versus Lynch describes. … I don't expect you to agree with this, but the archetypal reason for the plain air standard.
32 min of audioOral argument — People v. Jake
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 24, 2013
But the statute itself, there's a statute that permits evidence of prior domestic violence acts. … Jake had no defense and chose voluntarily not to testify and counsel the strategy, which Justice Connex already commented on.
25 min of audioOral argument — American Clinical Laboratory A v. Xavier Becerra
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 25, 2022
Subsection A-1 specifically delineates the reporting periods, and Congress has very carefully controlled those periods, provided that no reporting can occur before the next reporting period, set very clear … deadlines for the next reporting period.
27 min of audioOral argument — Kuba v. State of California
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2003
Well, you just heard, for example, a comment by Mr. Blatt that the content neutral, is it really content neutral, number one. … When the government seeks to introduce extrinsic act evidence, the crucial determination the district court must make is that
43 min of audioOral argument — James Henderson v. William Stephens, Director
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 18, 2015
Do you disagree with the Texas Psychological Association's comments in that court? … She said, whenever I saw him, he was clean, neatly dressed. He was a nice young man. Same goes for the Texas Ranger who interviewed him.
52 min of audioOral argument — Veterans Contracting Group v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2018
There was a wrongful act. They want to undo the consequences of the wrongful act. … The contracting officer ultimately acted reasonably. At the time, he thought he was acting reasonably. But as it turned out, he wasn't acting reasonably.
29 min of audioOral argument — Huntleigh USA v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2007
So we say the fact that the contracts were for a period of time subject to termination doesn't affect them. … So the airlines couldn't use Huntley after the act. Huntley's gone.
39 min of audioOral argument — John Whyde Jr v. Paul Sigsworth
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2024
Active resistance can exist when there's verbal hostility or a deliberate act of defiance, and that's what we had here, repeated deliberate acts of defiance. … And also at that point he was sufficiently, how do you say, at that point that he had already gone through withdrawal and was clean at that point or beyond the withdrawal symptoms.
36 min of audioOral argument — TANADGUSIX v. HUBER
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 7, 2004
There is no plausible meaning to that document other than the scenario that there would be rehabilitation of this vessel to fix it up and clean it up for some temporary period in Hawaii. … There was a one-year sort of grace period, if you will, 12 months to put it into use pursuant to the transfer document itself.
33 min of audioOral argument — Klees-Wallace v. FCC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2015
The government says it's whether her conduct, quote, breached the LCA, period, end quote. All their arguments stem from that. Maybe it's not final. … And would that decision of the board be reviewable by us at that point because the agency had acted, whether you want to call it ultra-virus or functus officio, the MSPB had acted without authority doing
34 min of audioOral argument — Sierra Club v. DOI
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2021
So, I guess the question is, what are your comments also with respect to timing, because I think that's a fair question. Certainly. … Really, they looked at the wrong time period here.
64 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Pheasant
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 10, 2024
So when it addresses a case about air pollution in the EPA, the the fact that they're addressing air pollution sort of gives rise to like it sort of animates the decision about the the scope of the delegation … And some commentators have talked about this recently. Justice Gorsuch, when he was a judge on the Tenth Circuit, talked about it.
36 min of audioOral argument — People v. Cole
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 22, 2014
Specifically, the jury found that on January 7, 2009, the defendant injured and engaged in an act of sexual penetration with a 20-month-old girl. … But the people submit that that baby wipe was used by the mother to clean up the child at 7.30 in the morning, which means that it wasn't in the diaper.
40 min of audioOral argument — People v. Singleton
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2019
His statement was that the jury wouldn't have been present in court that day had the defendant acted like a law-abiding citizen. … What about the trick comment? Again, the trick comment, although somewhat subtle, he states that the defense was trying to trick the jury.
42 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.