Documents

Oral argument — People v. Lee

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 15, 2010

And third, that the State failed to prove the unreasonable doubt the defendant did not act in self-defense. … Forget the fact that we don't accept a defendant's comments directly. Not to say we never can, but we have to have an additional fact.

Oral argument — Michael Hampton v. State of California

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2023

But the period of time that we're dealing with is beginning in mid to May to the end of May. … They use industrial fans to move air around through bars without solid walls. It's overcrowded. They have no defendants.

Oral argument — United States v. Saundra White

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2017

Simply repeating a simplistic fraud, right with errors, over a period of years, I don't think changes the fundamental nature of the fraud, which is commonplace. … In other words, the district court wasn't making up out of thin air. You text on your cell phone. You could be sitting in your living room doing that.

Oral argument — In re: GPMI, Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 25, 2023

But if they're acting actively to market it, and anybody, including your client, could engage in those discussions, what's the problem? … But that requirement is kind of being pulled out of thin air. They don't cite any cases where that is required. And, in fact, LaSalle expressly stopped short of saying that that was required.

Oral argument — United States v. Phillip Thompson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 31, 2019

And so if the mere act of committing a violation makes a person a fugitive. … Well, then we're completely up in the air about, well, was the person somehow retroactively not a fugitive during that period if, in fact, they weren't actually guilty of the violation?

Oral argument — G and G Productions LLC v. Rita Rusic

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 14, 2018

And we acted on that the moment the client found out. Where are the whereabouts of the painting? We believed it was in Florence, Italy. … But it's like you want to wipe Italy clean.

Oral argument — Phipps v. Wal Mart Stores

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2014

Secondly, the Supreme Court- Exactly one Air Force base, same test. But these are the same policies, Your Honor. Mr. … But in the state of Tennessee, the woman who is an appropriately filed person may not act in a representative capacity.

Oral argument — North Star Alaska Housing v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2009

That investigation delayed resolution of this case by more than a year, during which period Mr. Peterson, Ms. Kaiser, and others continued to abuse Northstar on almost a daily basis. … This is by statute, by statute under the Contract Disputes Act. Under the Contract Disputes Act and FAR, that is a wholly separate situation. What happens is you have a claim, you try to work it out.

Oral argument — Oscar Aguilar v. Werner Enterprises, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2016

You take all your air out of a tire and you run the car for a distance and you look at the inner liner, different distances, and you compare them. And Dr. … Counsel, what was the purpose of the judge's comments as to Mr. Aguilar's or Ms. Aguilar's reference to being from another country? Yes, Your Honor.

Oral argument — United States v. Mc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 16, 2019

And I think that this is what the magistrate was concerned, as well as the judge, is clear from his sentencing comments. But that's not what the statute says. … We're mindful of the fact here that what we have is somebody, this is plain air review for this court's purposes. There's been no objection below.

Oral argument — Vellali v. Yale University

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 25, 2024

So the error – your position is that the error was that comment the district court made that suggested you wouldn't have a breach when there's no loss. … You're right about that, and I would add that this is reviewed for plain air because plaintiffs didn't object to that.

Oral argument — Rafaelano v. Wilson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 23, 2006

period of time. … A person is ineligible for adjustment of status for a period of five years. Well, that five-year period, with respect to Ms.

Oral argument — Cintia Perez Zamora v. William Barr

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2020

So, you know, I understand all of that, your arguments, but what's at hand here is did the BIA air? And if so, how did it air? And what do we do? … Periods are used between the harm and the PSG.

Oral argument — Lichfield v. Kubler

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2026

I thought the argument that the broker made against NBC was that, well, NBC didn't air all of this other footage. … All this other footage NBC had that it didn't air that showed exonerating things about what this broker did.

Oral argument — Henry_Hill_v_Rick_Snyder

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 14, 2017

Do you have any further comments you would like to make on count 4, 5, and 6? On count 4, Your Honor? … I love clean rules, too. I know exactly what you're saying.

Oral argument — United States v. Martinez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2014

And there's really, in talking about what a typical domestic assault and battery might be, there was really no, it sort of is drawn out of the air. … First, the fact, I think, as the district court here found, the use of the word strike necessarily means a form of an intentional act.

Oral argument — People v. Jiles

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 20, 2010

In that period of time, the actual perpetrator could have been long gone. He was much further away. Mr. Giles was in the area around 9 o'clock. … Your Honor, a Supreme Court Rule 431B was violated when the trial judge failed to question the jurors on two of his air principles.

Oral argument — United States v. William Godoy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 12, 2025

How could it have been admissible as intrinsic evidence to demonstrate that there was an air of intimidation, control, threats that was a part of the scheme of controlling these individuals who were the … I believe he testified at trial, I would hear some comments about that, but again, then he would leave. So he really didn't have any concrete knowledge of that.

Oral argument — People v. McMiller

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 18, 2026

So the act is the same over a three-year period we're talking about. The victim is the same. It's the State. And the goal is the same. It's to recover this ill-gotten money. … These other comments the State is making about experts or Rule 701, those aren't hearsay responses.

Oral argument — Sihota v. IRS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2018

That issue was not fully aired at the arbitration. … I mean, the Back Pay Act provides back pay for the period from the unlawful removal until the reinstatement. Right.