Documents

Oral argument — Macfarlanv.Ivy Hill SNFLLcetal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2012

That restriction was not lifted until some later period. … Weinstein's comments, to stay directly on point with what is at issue in this case, first, he mentioned that judicial estoppel is not applicable in this case.

Oral argument — James Henderson v. William Stephens, Director

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 18, 2015

Do you disagree with the Texas Psychological Association's comments in that court? … She said, whenever I saw him, he was clean, neatly dressed. He was a nice young man. Same goes for the Texas Ranger who interviewed him.

Oral argument — Tristana Hunt v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 23, 2019

In addition, those incidents were limited to verbal comments. There were no allegations of touching whatsoever. Ms. … Furthermore, even if this court were to find that the employer acted unreasonably, we would note that Hunt herself acted unreasonably. As I mentioned earlier, Ms.

Oral argument — Reyes v. MSPB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2025

Here all they have is that it must be filed within a reasonable time period, which, when left to the discretion of a pro se appellant, leaves very questionable when that reasonable time period runs, correct … And of course, everything about the settlement agreement is now publicly aired in your filings.

Oral argument — Cummins v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2026

The cost of the claim to the government is completely up in the air. There's no certainty now about what that would be. … They involve OPM's misunderstanding of a 1948 Act of Congress.

Oral argument — Save Strawberry Canyon v. Steven Chu

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 16, 2012

Now, we had a brief discussion of intentional acts of destruction in the EAA. … If the public comments on the lack of accident analysis, we can provide analysis in response to the comment. Right. So that was an internal e-mail commenting on the draft E.A., not the final E.A.

Oral argument — American Clinical Laboratory A v. Xavier Becerra

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 25, 2022

Subsection A-1 specifically delineates the reporting periods, and Congress has very carefully controlled those periods, provided that no reporting can occur before the next reporting period, set very clear … deadlines for the next reporting period.

Oral argument — William Fitzgerald v. County of Orange

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2014

The speaker guidelines stop at the words, speakers shall refrain from engaging in personal and pertinent slanderous or profane remarks, period. … I'm sorry, I didn't mean to interrupt, but your comments, your question, those comments, the heed my words, that was said right there face to face. Thank you.

Oral argument — United States v. Nathan Wilson

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2024

This isn't the District Court acting on his own because he disliked the bar memo. … I think you could look at police facility arsons, and that would be a really clean control group for allegedly burning a police car in Santa Monica.

Oral argument — Hope v. Warden York Cty Prison

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 18, 2020

We made recent changes that we flagged about how staff, contractors, and the like, cleaning, masks, all these different sorts of things that the district court, of course, couldn't account for. … What is your comment with respect to those two items? Sure, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Design Concrete Foundations, etc. v. Erie Insurance, etc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2014

To introduce my client, I recall reading legislative histories recently when they were amending the Mechanics Clean Act. … That involved a self-defense exception to a potential act of exclusion.

Oral argument — 04-10619 United States v. S Whiteaker

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2007

I've never seen a judge make that kind of a comment during an open court at a hearing questioning a law enforcement officer's integrity. He certainly would be quite frank with you. … There is certainly an evidence code section which states that if a person acts a certain way and has a habit or custom, that that can be introduced to show that on this occasion he acted in conformity

Oral argument — 3-55412 Jenkins v. Cnty of Riverside

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2004

She was initially brought in, she thought, to clean up some backlog, and this was all presented to the court. … That she was terminated in violation of the Fair Employment and Housing Act for disability or perceived disability. That was a pendant claim to this action.

Oral argument — Martins v. Vermont Mutual Insurance Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2024

You have 93A and 176D, which place obligations on insurance companies to act reasonably with respect to not only their insureds but third parties. … There was more discovery for a longer period conducted. McGillow 8 and Ercolini were consolidated to keep things clean and together.

Oral argument — United States v. Kincade

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 23, 2004

The special need cases almost always are to prevent a harm, not to clean up after the harm has been committed. … I mean, here, the interest that all that the blood draw is getting in the system that has been set up with the DNA Identification Act of 1994 and the 2000 Collection Act is a DNA profile deriving from

Oral argument — Curtis Rookaird v. BNSF Railway Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2018

Plaintiff alleged that he was dismissed for engaging in three activities protected by the Federal Railroad Safety Act. … In other words, that the air test was a contributing factor as a matter of law. What did he have to show?

Oral argument — Henley v. Schaaf

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 28, 2017

That means that we were on a clean slate. We could proceed, we could add witnesses, we could add evidence, we could do anything we wanted to do at that point. … Well, is it true that Judge Clark took the position that you cannot raise, bring in new evidence, period, that is different than the first trial?

Oral argument — People v. Lee

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 15, 2010

And third, that the State failed to prove the unreasonable doubt the defendant did not act in self-defense. … Forget the fact that we don't accept a defendant's comments directly. Not to say we never can, but we have to have an additional fact.

Oral argument — Michael Hampton v. State of California

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2023

But the period of time that we're dealing with is beginning in mid to May to the end of May. … They use industrial fans to move air around through bars without solid walls. It's overcrowded. They have no defendants.

Oral argument — In re: GPMI, Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 25, 2023

But if they're acting actively to market it, and anybody, including your client, could engage in those discussions, what's the problem? … But that requirement is kind of being pulled out of thin air. They don't cite any cases where that is required. And, in fact, LaSalle expressly stopped short of saying that that was required.