Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.20s
Reply Brief — Sullivan v. Finkelstein
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1990
Round- tree, 723 F.2d 399, cert. denied, 469 U.S. 818 (1984). … See Pet. 24 & 0.19.
496 U.S. 617Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Samuel Earl Smith, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 25, 2021
Mankiewicz, 122 F.3d 399 (7th Cir. 1997) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3, 6 United States v. … Mankiewicz, 122 F.3d 399, 405–06 and n. 4 (7th Cir. 1997); United States v. Mitchell, 85 F.3d 800, 813–14 (1st Cir. 1996); United States v.
Respondents Brief — Snow v. Commissioner
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1974
Commissioner, 399 F. 2d 326 _ 21, 24, 32, 35, 36 Teitelbaum v. Commissioner, 294 F. 2d 541, certiorari denied, 368 U.S. 987 15 Trent v. Commissioner, 291 F. 2d 669 _ . 24 ; United States v. … , “Section 24 CoS Eas.
416 U.S. 500Amicus Curiae Brief — Rothgery v. Gillespie County
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008
Jackson, 475 U.S., at 627-28; Brewer, 430 U.S., at 399. … Indeed, in Brewer, the Court was careful to point out that even though it had concluded that the defendant’s right to counsel had “no doubt” attached, 430 U.S., at 399, the 24 protection of the Sixth
554 U.S. 191Petition for Writ of Certiorari — James Erin McKinney, Petitioner v. Arizona
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 21, 2019
See id. at 398-399. … Id. at 399 (emphasis added and internal quotation marks omitted).
Reply Brief of Petitioner — Harrington v. California
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief of Petitioner · 1969
Y. eager, 399 F.2d 598 (3rd Cir. 1968) 02... United States v. Hoffa, 402 F.2d 380 (7th Cir. " 1968) ; | 8 13 a United States v. Kelly, 399 F.2d 692 (3rd Cir. -" 1968). United States v. … State of Maryland, 386 U.S. 66, , TL. 24 78.
395 U.S. 250Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Daquan Carey, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 3, 2025
United States, 554 U.S. 237, 128 S.Ct. 2559, 171 L.Ed.2d 399 (2008) .................................................................................................. 3 Moody v. … Docket No. 8:24-cr-00115-TPB-NHA-1 USCA11 Case: 24-14172 2 Document: 28-1 Date Filed: 06/20/2025 Opinion of the Court Page: 2 of 6 24-14172 ____________________ Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge
Amicus Curiae Brief — Marrama v. Citizens Bank of Mass.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Mo. 20084).................. 24 In re Koss, 319 B.R. 319 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2005) ................... 24 In re Love, oe ee 26 In re Marcakis, 254 B.R. 77 (Bankr. … FURLONG ALTMAN RILEY ESHER LLP 100 Franklin Street Boston, MA 02110 (617) 399-7300
549 U.S. 365Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Joshua Devon Barrow, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 3, 2025
Barrow, No. 24-10155, 2025 WL 1984267, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 17757 (5th Cir. … Illinois directly condemns the approach taken below. 399 U.S. 235 (1970).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Mahoney v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1988
Jackson, 429 U.S. 399, 399- 400 (1977) ‘per curiam): Jimenez v. Weinberger, 417 U.S. 628, 637-38 (1974): United States v. … United States, 422 U.S. 617, 623-24 (1975): United States v. Donruss Co., 393 U.S. 297, 299 (1969); Commissioner v.
486 U.S. 1054Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Atterbury v. Ragen (No. 879)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1956
Weakley, 226 F. 2d 399 (9th Cir. 1956) .... 6, 8 Screws v. United States, 325 U.S. 91 (1945) 2... 7 Siegel v. Ragen, 88 F. Supp. 996 (N.D. Ill. 1949) ...... 7 Sweeney v. … , 1949, ¢. 139, § 90, 63 Stat. 102. 63 Stat. 102. (28 U.S.C.A. § 1651) SP SIR ae 10 Act of June 25, 1948, ¢. 646, 62 Stat. 954, amended May 24, 1949, c. 139, § 98, 63 Stat. 104, as amended Oct. 31,
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 23, 2022
The date on which the highest state court decided my case was 9/15/2021 A copy of that decision appears at Appendix A [X A timely petition for rehearing was thereafter denied on the following date: 2/24 … {/ . 2012 22 23 l / QSp\/SQg/ // O' 24 25 K Judge Dated this__ day of 20 Dated this___day of / 7 2012 ., 203 26 ORDER TO VACATE SUSPENSION AND RESTORE LICENSE Kofi Kyei, Petitioner P.O.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Joshua Flores, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 3, 2024
King, Juries, Democracy, and Petty Crime, 24 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 817 (2022) ............................................................................. 7 John M. … King, Juries, Democracy, and Petty Crime, 24 U. Pa. J. Const.
Reply Brief — NationsBank of North Carolina, N. A. v. Variable Annuity Life Insurance
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1994
Agents, 399 F.2d „AA 4 SEC v. Variable Annuity Life Ins. Co., 359 U.S. 65 TTT ͤ ̃ ̃——— ͤ— — — 5 Statutes and regulation: Act of Jan. 12, 1983, Pub. L. No. 97-457, 5 3001), 96 Stat. … Agents, 399 F.2d 1010 (1968), relied on by the court below in this case (see 93-1612 Pet. App. 6a-10a), can be distinguished from the D.C. Circuit’s decision in Independent Bankers Ass’n v.
511 U.S. 1141Opposition — New York v. Howard
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1980
Dated: New York, New York October 24, 1980 Respectfully submitted, ‘A At Sa NRY WINESTINE WILLIAM E. … Dated: New York, New York October 24, 1980 \ oe ee Henry Winestine Nv °". RECEIVED af OCT 27 1980 No. 80-543 OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT, U.S.
449 U.S. 1023Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · 1973
Justice Rehnquist on September 24, 1973. The 90-day period provided by 28 U.S.C. 2101(c) for petitioning in civil cases expired on September 24, 1973. The petition was filed on October 9, 1973. … Computing Co., 261 U.S. 399, 418. ' The application was thus untimely under this Court’s Rule 34(2). (1) = MS A ROPER ET?
414 U.S. 1093Opposition Brief — Finlayson v. Town of Monticello
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1944
City of Detroit, et al., 181 U. 8. 399; 21 S. Ct. 624; 45 L. Ed. 395. French v. Barber Asphalt Pav. Co., 21 8. Ct. 625, 181 U. 8S. 324, 45 L. Ed. 879, 5 Farrell v. … Smith, 24 8. Ct. 88; 191 U. 8. 310; 48 L. Ed. 195. As pointed out in the case of Campbell v. City of Olney, 262 U. 8. 352; 43 8. Ct. 559; 67 L. Ed. 1021.
323 U.S. 666Reply Brief — Richard Gerald Jordan, Petitioner v. Mississippi
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Jun 24, 2025
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) ...................................................................................................................... 4 Howell v. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 411 (1986).
Reply Brief — Tinkoff v. Campbell
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1947
S. 390, 399... 5,6 Munn y. Illinois, 94 U. 8. (4 Otto) 113; 24 L. Ed. 77, SO idethistalicelbas raped i ek Se ee 5 Prigg v. Pennsylvania, 16 Pet. 539, 615.. 2,3 So. Pac. R. R. Co. v. U. … S. (4 Otto) 113; 24 L. Ed. 77, on page 90, in the Dissent of Mr.
331 U.S. 845Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Smith v. Baker
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1972
Inclusion Cases, 389 U.S. 486 (1969); New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 U.S. 392 (1970). … Id. at 2205, A-24.
409 U.S. 890
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.