Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

3.36s

  • Oral argument — Jay v. Globalfoundries U.S. In

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2019

    In this case, readily available, he has to be able to use it within the time period by which he's asked to do this task. … Each of those times, the force that acted on the object primarily was gravity because it was dropped and it fell.

    25 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Xianbing Gan

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 7, 2022

    Not that it was somebody else that committed those acts or that those acts did not, in fact, constitute money laundering or anything like that. … But again, he also made comments in closing argument. And I just went while I was listening and pulled it, and I point Your Honors to page 54 of the defense closing.

    25 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Louis Zacherle

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2020

    We're here today because the district court aired when it imposed $15,000 in restitution under the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act, because the record lacks a sufficient, reliable causal link between … It can only be for a single act. And so that would be multiplicitous for it to be multiple offenses during that three-year period. And Mr.

    22 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Turner v. Concord Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 22, 2023

    A period on care. This court should reverse the circuit court. When it improperly denied a period on his motion to dismiss. … And air room had the sole power to choose the arbitral forum. This court found that these facts established unconscionability.

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Kuba v. State of California

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2003

    Well, you just heard, for example, a comment by Mr. Blatt that the content neutral, is it really content neutral, number one. … When the government seeks to introduce extrinsic act evidence, the crucial determination the district court must make is that

    43 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Pickett v. Duncan

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 11, 2003

    I found no affirmative comment in the third trial until he's filed his motion for a new trial. Okay. … And also, petitioner mentioned that he didn't have clean clothes, which may have been another reason for his decision not to discuss that.

    40 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Dieter Riechmann v. Florida, Department of Corrections

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 17, 2019

    He was constantly asking the witnesses for specificity with respect to timeframes and periods of time throughout the trial. … Richman a complete clean bill of health either. They interjected a significant amount of minimizing or some negative things as well. You're saying that the witnesses that Mr.

    50 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Vilchiz

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2013

    The state did a very good job of keeping this a clean trial. My arguments are not with the state's behavior at all. My arguments are that Mr. … Wasn't there a period of time when Torres was with the truck alone and he slept in the truck and Mr. Vilches was gone for a significant period of time? That is Mr.

    40 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Karen Echols v. Ryan Gardiner

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2015

    In fact, there was testimony that his hands were in the air with nothing in them. We think this is fairly open and shut. … You had a whole – you had 23 complaints in a period of five or six years.

    46 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Kessler

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2026

    And there's no comment in the reply brief saying she wasn't served or wasn't aware of it. But on top of that, it's been sort of the whole issue the whole time. … Air Doctor has nothing to do with diversity. There's no state court. It's the Latham Act, a federal court. There's no discussion of diversity, no discussion of California law.

    27 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Pacific Surf Designs, Inc. v. Whitewater West Industries, Ltd.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2024

    I understood your earlier comments to be that you can't group together a series of lawful acts and then say you have an anti competitive, unlawful acts. Yes. … There's a different element of a Sherman Act Section 2 claim that has to harm competition.

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Tristana Hunt v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 23, 2019

    In addition, those incidents were limited to verbal comments. There were no allegations of touching whatsoever. Ms. … Furthermore, even if this court were to find that the employer acted unreasonably, we would note that Hunt herself acted unreasonably. As I mentioned earlier, Ms.

    20 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Reyes v. MSPB

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2025

    Here all they have is that it must be filed within a reasonable time period, which, when left to the discretion of a pro se appellant, leaves very questionable when that reasonable time period runs, correct … And of course, everything about the settlement agreement is now publicly aired in your filings.

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Huawei Technologies USA, Inc v. FCC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2020

    So if you weren't banned while you were under review, what harm, actual harm, did you suffer during this time period as opposed to a future time period when you actually are banned? … In the air, so to speak. Right. So the commission relied upon several, several provisions of section 254 of the broad discretion to balance competing policies under the act.

    60 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Nathan Wilson

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2024

    This isn't the District Court acting on his own because he disliked the bar memo. … I think you could look at police facility arsons, and that would be a really clean control group for allegedly burning a police car in Santa Monica.

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Hope v. Warden York Cty Prison

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 18, 2020

    We made recent changes that we flagged about how staff, contractors, and the like, cleaning, masks, all these different sorts of things that the district court, of course, couldn't account for. … What is your comment with respect to those two items? Sure, Your Honor.

    45 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Design Concrete Foundations, etc. v. Erie Insurance, etc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2014

    To introduce my client, I recall reading legislative histories recently when they were amending the Mechanics Clean Act. … That involved a self-defense exception to a potential act of exclusion.

    49 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Love v. McDonough

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2024

    If they don't act on the request, then you can ask for a mandamus to force them to act on it. And if you do appeal it, then under Rule 8, you can ask that the payments continue pending appeal. … The reason we're here today is because we don't have that option because of how the board has acted.

    23 min of audio
  • Oral argument — 04-10619 United States v. S Whiteaker

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2007

    I've never seen a judge make that kind of a comment during an open court at a hearing questioning a law enforcement officer's integrity. He certainly would be quite frank with you. … There is certainly an evidence code section which states that if a person acts a certain way and has a habit or custom, that that can be introduced to show that on this occasion he acted in conformity

    49 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Tamela Muir v. Decatur County, Iowa

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2018

    the basis that the sheriff's termination of Muir was in violation of any kind of settled law certainly Singleton in this circuit and most certainly in other circuits where it seems to be ball up in the air … well I believe they did in Wingate and I believe they didn't Skolski correct for marital association I believe well is there speech involved in here or not directly well he was she was let go because of comments

    32 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.