Documents

Oral argument — Ray L. Olin v. Dakota Access, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 18, 2018

conditioner we sell the best you know the most efficient air conditioner that's puffery it seems to me like this is a lot more specific it's you need to act now or else you're gonna get you're gonna get … didn't analyze any of the other elements that are possible in this claim the claim that the Morton is many unfair tactics they allege false statements it doesn't say false in the future it says false period

Oral argument — In Re: Foreign Exchange Bench

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 16, 2019

Class counsel talk about the fact that even after nine defendants settled, there were still six additional defendants that held out for an additional period of time. … I believe her comment was the risk decreased with each successive settlement.

Oral argument — United States v. Antonio Bryant

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 18, 2024

factors there's a top light but but basically that was it they didn't an officer's not suppression is not only required when an officer says you can't leave or halt let's talk about um earlier um there was comments … wouldn't have continued to question he wouldn't have asked oh were you trying to evade the police if he had seen a bulge that doesn't matter anymore now we've got reasonable suspicion because i see you're acting

Oral argument — Bd of Trustees Glazing Health v. Shannon Chambers

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 12, 2018

You're kind of, you know, the sky is falling chicken little here, but how many really are there in that period of time? How many? Yeah. … Well, it seems like it's Nevada pretty much acting simultaneously. This, I mean, the new law is responsive to exactly the problems that you were facing.

Oral argument — RBallv.Commissioner IRS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 17, 2013

And the failure to recognize it for a period of time doesn't make it not income. So what's wrong with that reasoning? … So Congress cleaned up 108 after Gitlet's and I think understood that it was taking care of Gitlet's because it was always understood as providing this narrow sort of loophole.

Oral argument — Northern Plains v. US Land Mngt.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 3, 2004

Another source of restrictions is the Federal Land Policy Management Act. … Evidently, they decided back before the limitations period that is open to you to challenge that small-scale development is necessary in order to tell whether the methane is there in sufficient quantities

Oral argument — Starns v. Obenland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 23, 2019

So the trial court did cite the rawhide versus satellite air and land services case. In that case, it's clearly distinguishable from the facts you have in this case. … As for any of these issues, it could have been cleaned up if there were questions that there weren't.

Oral argument — United States v. Kimo Sims

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 20, 2016

What is there about this sentence that you would change if you were the judge to make it acceptable so we can have this person on the street and stay clean? … Now, the reason why that's in favor of the government is because the Controlled Substance Analog Act, it prohibits all types of analogs.

Oral argument — United States v. Dante Glinn

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2017

You're up first, and let me tell you now, I'll tell you once for both of your cases, but thank you for serving under the Criminal Justice Act. … There's also indications of at least an The court makes the finding that, and states that in order to be completely clean and sober, you can't be using alcohol.

Oral argument — AB Taylor v. Kilolo Kijakazi

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2021

However, his back was okay until after he suffered a work injury to his back in 2010 while cleaning out a machine with an industrial vacuum. … Can you comment on the ALJ's decision, though, to afford great weight to the opinions back in 10 and 11 from Drs. Fletcher, Jones, and Santiago?

Oral argument — Fidlar Technologies v. LPS Real Estate Data Solutions

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2015

Well, for some period of time. … And they say, meaning it didn't, period. Well, it's not a period. It's a dash. And there are eight or nine more lines of testimony after that. Punctuation matters.

Oral argument — Glen Friedman v. Live Nation Merchandise

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2016

In principle, I could go and sue each consumer for taking the selfie and putting it on the air. Okay. … I have to prove the act. So I would have to prove that the act... You don't have to prove that the other people are also liable?

Oral argument — NYCAL OFFSHORE DEVELOPMENT v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2013

That's the Vaccine Act case, right? Pardon me? That's the Vaccine Act case. Yes, it is. Which is essentially a tort case. Well, that's right. … And so what the trial court did was identify this one necessary step, the need to obtain air permits, emissions permits, air pollution permits, that kind of thing, and analyze whether or not the operator

Oral argument — Garrido v. Arena

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2013

The defendant sent mailers and aired a television advertisement during the campaign for the 45th Ward aldermanic position. … So there was an approximate two-week period of time when action could have been taken if he chose to do so during the election, and he chose not to.

Oral argument — People v. Wolfe

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2010

In fact, we cited another case that was pulled out in our reply brief that the court found that it's even a two-week period. … She wouldn't have asked those questions, and we paused for the court, that she wouldn't have gone back inside had Inspector Kennedy not kept making those comments.

Oral argument — United States v. James Juan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2018

Well, first of all, I don't think anybody in this room wants to have one of these kinds of sex of value assessments, no matter how clean their life has been. It's a very personal. … And the treatment that he didn't complete dates back to the earlier period when he was convicted in the federal court on juvenile violation for the sex offense and because it didn't complete the treatment

Oral argument — HYDRANAUTICS v. FILMTEC CORP.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2007

Fraud by intentional misrepresentation and also fraud by act of concealment. And California law recognizes both as well as Federal law. … We will stand in recess for an undetermined period of time.

Oral argument — People of the State v. USDA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 20, 2008

Again, and the only issue is did the agency act reasonably in 2005 in looking back at essentially what was the status quo for the most part for those periods of time in determining, look, the National … My name is Kristen Boyles, and I want to address the Endangered Species Act issues and the Remedy Act issues here.

Oral argument — United States v. ARMANDO-MENDOZA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 16, 2006

I would like to see if you would like to comment on that, if you would like to comment on that. And what does the case stand for? … One statement from a cold record that I apologize for everything in the government's position is not sufficient to overcome the clear air standard here.

Oral argument — JENNINGS v. SSA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2010

They're expected to act professionally and do what they're supposed to do. The SSA has offices all over Atlanta? Well, the hearing sites. … In other words, he kept himself clean at the military side.