Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Hepps

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985

The instant case permits us to see again, cleaned of that coating, the unalloyed truth of New York Times’ most basic teaching: “What a state may not constitu- tionally bring about by means of criminal … would fulfill its historic function in this nation, must embrace all issues about which in- formation is needed or appropriate to enable the members of society to cope with the exigencies of their period

Amicus Curiae Brief — Starbucks Corporation, Petitioner v. M. Kathleen McKinney, Regional Director of Region 15 of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on Behalf of the National Labor Relations Board

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 29, 2024

These features of course describe the National Labor Relations Act, as amended in 1947 with the Taft-Hartley Act’s addition of Sections 10(j) and 10(l), 29 U.S.C. §§ 160(j), (l). See Garner v. … MercExchange, LLC, 547 U.S. 388, 395 (2006) (Roberts, C.J., concurring) (equity courts need not “[write] on an entirely clean slate” with each new case; “[d]iscretion is not whim, and limiting discretion

Amicus Curiae Brief — Advocate Health Care Network v. Stapleton, 137 S. Ct. 1248 (2017) (No. 16-74)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017

AIRE TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIBEG................::ccssceseeeeees INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE..................... SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ....0000.. ccc eeeee I. Il. It. … The Treas- ury was not commenting on a non-existent proposal to exempt stand-alone agency plans that were already subject to ERISA.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Gerald E. Groff, Petitioner v. Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 27, 2023

Periodic reflections on the teachings in that document have led later popes to discuss additional concepts that reveal the importance of accommodating religious practices in the workplace. … Act Patterson, 140 S.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1974

United Air Lines, Inc., 444 F. 2d 1194, 1202 (C.A. 7), certiorari denied, 404 U.S. 991. … We address our comments to the facts currently of record.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Charles Walen, et al., Appellants v. Doug Burgum, Governor of North Dakota, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 5, 2024

Ct. 1795, 1801 (2019) (cleaned up). … For “the period 1960 through 1968,” that area made up “17.8% of the population” of Marion County but was home to only “4.75% of the senators and 5.97% of the representatives.” Id. at 133.

Amicus Curiae Brief — United States, Petitioner v. Arthrex, Inc., et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 30, 2020

(Without further comment, we will use the “250” number in this brief.) … for ALJs, and 1975 Patent Act amendments for APJs.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives v. Flores (Nos. 08-294, 08-289)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008

Opportunities Act, Be UA. … Aeronautics Committee of New York Citys Bar Association Seeks to Raise the Bar on Safety, 12 AIR SAFETY WEFK, at 33 (Aug. 17, 1998).

Amicus Curiae Brief — National Religious Broadcasters Noncommercial Music License Committee, Petitioner v. Copyright Royalty Board, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 13, 2024

Campbell, II, Comment, Freedom of Speech: Evolution of the Enlightenment Function, 29 MERCER L. REV. 811, 811-14 (1978). … (cleaned up). However, regulating speech by subject matter and by “function or purpose” are both “distinctions drawn based on the message a speaker conveys.” Reed v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Rust v. Sullivan

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991

Do new regulations promulgated by HHS under Title X of the Public Health Service Act which prohibit abortion counselling, referral and advocacy in programs funded under the Act and require physical … Comment, The Title X Famiiy Planning Gag Rule Can the Government Buy Up Constitutional Rights? 41 Stan. L. Rev. 401, 408 (1989).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Douglas v. California Pharmacists Association, (2009) (No. 1158)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009

Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 (1983), this Court addressed the question of federal jurisdiction over preemption claims. … For example, the apély- named Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 (ADA), which regulates air carriers (49 U.S.C. § 41713(b)), preempts state laws that regulate “price[s], route[s], or service.”

Amicus Curiae Brief — Belshe v. Orthopaedic Hospital

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997

her admini- stration of the Act. … Strumpf, 516 U.S. 16, 21 n.* (1995); Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. August, 450 U.S. 346, 362 (1981); Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 147 n.2 (1970). 3. a.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Hamdan v. Rumsfeld

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

Furthermore, as one commentator notes: “The significance of Geneva Conventions III and 1V to "The Schooner Peggy, 5 U.S. (1 Cr.) 103, 109 (1801). ™Id., 110. … Yet, with respect to the power that Congress gave the Army and Air Force TJAGs to “receive, revise and have recorded the proceedings of .. .

Amicus Curiae Brief — Maxwell-Jolly v. Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2011

Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 (1983), this Court addressed the question of federal jurisdiction over preemption claims. … For example, the apély- named Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 (ADA), which regulates air carriers (49 U.S.C. § 41713(b)), preempts state laws that regulate “price[s], route[s], or service.”

Amicus Curiae Brief — Department of Homeland Security, et al., Petitioners v. Regents of the University of California, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 4, 2019

Dream Act Coal. v. … MSHA stated that the withdrawal was based, in part, on a decision by the Eleventh Circuit to invalidate a similar, earlier air quality rule. Id. at 42.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Reves v. Ernst & Young

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993

commission of the acts, and (3) the acts had “some effect” on the enterprise. … O'Hara, 652 F. . 1049, 1054 (W.D.N.Y. 1987) (contractor who submitted audulent bids on a m waste clean-up contract participated affairs pa da Virden v. Graphics One, 623 F. . 1417 (C.D.

Amicus Curiae Brief — The School of the Ozarks, Inc., dba College of the Ozarks, Petitioner v. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 30, 2023

Public comment periods offered by regulatory agencies are critical to accomplish this task. … period, N.C.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Brendan Dassey, Petitioner v. Michael A. Dittmann

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 26, 2018

Goodman, Taking Responsibility for an Act Not Committed: The Influence of Age and Suggestibility, 27 L. & Hum. … Goodman, Taking Responsibility for an Act Not Committed: The Influence of Age and Suggestibility, 27 L. & Hum.

Amicus Curiae Brief — League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

The average beginning-to-end falloff rate in this period is thus 24 percent. … Gingles concurrence should play no part in the Act.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Jackson v. Perry (Nos. 05-276, 05-204, 05-254, 05-439)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

The average beginning-to-end falloff rate in this period is thus 24 percent. … Gingles concurrence should play no part in the Act.