Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.84s
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 10, 2026
Air Act (CAA) for the 2015 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). … of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act.
91 FR 18347Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; VT; Prevention of Significant Deterioration, PM2.5
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 14, 2016
This action is being taken in accordance with the Clean Air Act. DATES: This direct final rule will be effective November 14, 2016, unless EPA receives adverse comments by October 14, 2016. … Air Act.
81 FR 63102Environmental Protection AgencyApproval of California Air Plan; Owens Valley Serious Area Plan for the 1987 24-Hour PM10 Standard
Federal Register · Rule · Mar 13, 2017
Public Comments and the EPA's Response to Comments The EPA provided a 30-day public comment period on our proposed action. The comment period ended on January 11, 2017. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
82 FR 13390Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 7, 2014
Appropriately, EPA has simply reviewed ODEQ's BART analysis for consistency with the Clean Air Act and the BART Guidelines.” … Comment: We received one comment in support of the proposed action, which indicated that the Oklahoma RH SIP revision submittal satisfies EPA's and ODEQ's obligations under the Clean Air Act.
79 FR 12944Environmental Protection AgencyNotice of Approval for Other Use of Phosphogypsum
Federal Register · Notice · Dec 23, 2024
The Agency's review found that Mosaic's request is complete per the requirements of EPA's National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants under the Clean Air Act, and that the potential radiological … The EPA's regulations under the Clean Air Act at 40 CFR part 61, subpart R (hereafter “Subpart R”) require that phosphogypsum must be disposed of in engineered piles, called stacks, to limit public exposure
89 FR 104535Environmental Protection AgencyTreatment of Data Influenced by Exceptional Events
Federal Register · Rule · Mar 22, 2007
AQS Air Quality System. BACM Best Available Control Measures. CAA Clean Air Act. CAAA Clean Air Act Amendments. EPA Environmental Protection Agency. FEM Federal Equivalent Methods. … Comments and Responses Comment: Several commenters indicated that EPA should limit the time period associated with clean-up activities due to a natural disaster.
72 FR 13560Environmental Protection AgencyRevisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District
Federal Register · Rule · Feb 12, 2002
Public Comments and EPA Responses EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received a comment from the SCAQMD correcting the adoption date for Rule 109. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
67 FR 6410Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · May 5, 2011
This action is being taken under section 110 of the Clean Air Act. DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 6, 2011 . … Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline identified. II.
76 FR 25652Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Maintenance Plan Revisions; Ohio
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 19, 1998
Public Comments on the Proposed Rulemaking The public comment period on USEPA's June 18, 1998, proposal to approve Ohio's request ended on July 20, 1998. See 63 FR 33314. … The Clean Air Act forbids USEPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co., v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
63 FR 44399Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jun 6, 2003
Final Action EPA is approving the aforementioned changes to the SIP because the revisions are consistent with Clean Air Act and EPA regulatory requirements. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
68 FR 33873Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; New Hampshire; Regional Haze
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 22, 2012
The NPS commented that Clean Air Markets data indicates that MK1 is not meeting the 0.15 lb/MMBtu target. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
77 FR 50602Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Dec 17, 2018
The public comment period for this proposed rulemaking ended on October 29, 2018. The EPA received one comment from an anonymous commenter. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
83 FR 64470Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 10, 2023
This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before August 9, 2023. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. … comment period.
88 FR 43483Environmental Protection AgencyAir Quality: EPA’s 2006 Changes to the Particulate Matter (PM) Standards
Congressional research report · CRS Report · Apr 17, 2008
Committee, or CASAC) mandated under the Clean Air Act. … Circuit challenging 1 Sections 108-109 of the Clean Air Act.
RL33254Congressional Research ServiceFederal Register · Notice · Feb 24, 2023
Public comments were previously requested via the Federal Register on August 26, 2022, during a 60-day comment period (87 FR 52552). … Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (section 114(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7414(a)(1)). Estimated number of respondents: 117 (total).
88 FR 11915Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Idaho: Infrastructure Requirements for the 2015 Ozone Standard
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 16, 2020
SUMMARY: Whenever the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) promulgates a new or revised National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS), the Clean Air Act requires each State to make a State Implementation … Page, Director, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. “Guidance on Infrastructure State Implementation Plan (SIP) Elements under Clean Air Act Sections 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2).”
85 FR 57723Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Connecticut
Federal Register · Rule · Oct 24, 1997
The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2). C. … The 1990 base year emission inventory requirement of section 182(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990, has been satisfied for these areas.
62 FR 55336Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · May 9, 2022
Public Comments and EPA Responses The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. … We received three comments during this period, and each one was supportive of this proposed action. III.
87 FR 27526Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 15, 1999
An approved OBD program is required for state and local Inspection/Maintenance (I/M) programs by section 203(m)(3) of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … All public comments received will be discussed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this rule.
64 FR 12749Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 11, 2011
We are approving a local rule that regulates these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
76 FR 40660Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.