Documents

Oral argument — Schick v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2008

Well, the hearing is provided for in Section 641D of the Act. … In the event that they do produce it within the required time period, it will not be revoked. So you're saying that the language is and may thereafter be revoked is not really discretionary.

Oral argument — United States v. McQueary, II

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 26, 2024

But, again, whether the hospital acted in good or bad faith in this case is irrelevant because there was no agency relationship. … For example, they tell the hospital, you are now going to retain these videos for a certain period of time, and we have an agreement from you to do that.

Oral argument — Obie v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2025

And the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, in the findings at the opening, Congress says that religiously neutral acts can interfere with the exercise of religion as much as purposeful acts. … And what he says is, I'm quoting here, if the CFTC cleans up its act, ends its culture of retaliation, and stops trying to ban prayer, I will consider a return.

Oral argument — David Adams v. Palm Beach County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2024

These workers, our plaintiffs, delivered golf carts, cleaned them, maintained the grounds, retrieved balls, set the golf carts up, and otherwise interacted with the customers of the golf course and provided … Well, the, I guess the public agencies are entitled to use volunteers and to provide them reasonable, um, benefits, uh, that are not compensation covered by the act, uh, that's an exception.

Oral argument — Gerasi v. Gilbane Building Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 14, 2017

in comment B. … But if somebody routinely performs negligent acts and never causes damage or injury, does that eliminate the negligent act the time it does cause an injury?

Oral argument — Ian Scott-Anderman v. Robert Martinez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2022

And the court said, well, that's, that's a, you know, moved or not really right now because that's going on before the district court and the district court should act and then will act. … That period of weakness. Justify. The imposition. But judge, it's not just a limited period. And suddenly it becomes. It's void from the inception. So what the relief in this case would be.

Oral argument — BLANKENHORN v. CITY OF ORANGE

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2006

I'd like to address Judge King's comment first, and that is that there's no allegation in this case of any racial bias. … I mean, it could be an air right, supposedly, I suppose.

Oral argument — Air Products & Chemicals Co. v. ICC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 10, 2015

The Commission just drew that conclusion out of thin air. … It must base the decision on the record, in this case, under Section 10-103 of the Public Utilities Act.

Oral argument — Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft Zur Forderung Der Angewand v. Sirius XM Radio Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 13, 2022

And we believe the arising under requires more of a direct length, not a one step or a two step remove from the underlying act. … There was an award of attorney's fees and also a conditional fee of, I think, $20,000 if the arbitration didn't occur within a specific time period.

Oral argument — Peterson Brothers v. Lexington Ins. Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2007

And the reason being is that that is not a protected act. The employee did not have, had not tested positive for drugs, was not in a rehab program. … Ciaz's use of drugs, illegal drugs, which is an intentional act.

Oral argument — United States v. Joshua Elkins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 10, 2012

here in support of his motion to dismiss reflect an exact, basically the same frequency of reporting, 90 days, lifetime duration, which again under SORNA could be knocked down to 25 years if he has a clean … Elkins was traveling, perhaps for an extended period of time, but traveling nonetheless, perhaps not moving.

Oral argument — Yochanan Markman v. Whole Foods Market, Inc., et a

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 6, 2018

This is a suit under the Exchange Act, right? Yes, it is. And the PSLRA, yes. What specifically is the claim with respect to the accuracy of the financial statements? There is a claim about that. … He was Whole Foods' designate throughout the California investigation, which started before the class period and continued through the class period.

Oral argument — People v. Miki

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 2, 2020

The evidence showing that she would sit with the defendant and his family at church during that time period. The fact that she would go to his house. … When the sexual conduct occurred and the trial court aired in finding him guilty. Thank you. I have no other comments. Thank you, Justice bridges. Do you have any questions. I do not. Thank you.

Oral argument — XL Specialty Insurance Company v. Progressive Casualty Insurance

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2010

In that case, we would reserve the remaining period of time and allow Excel to argue the coverage issues as that is their appellate issue. All right. Very well. Thank you very much. Counsel? … Well, that's up in the air. I don't know exactly. The helicopter's on the ground. To be refueled.

Oral argument — Chicago Recycling Coalition v. City of Chicago Department of Street & Sanitation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 29, 2023

May it please the Court, this case comes under the Freedom of Information Act, which the General Assembly declared is fundamental to the American Constitutional form. … And so as a result, you then don't have to comply with the FOIA request because, you know, as far as you're concerned, your hands are clean. You don't have it.

Oral argument — Villetti v. Guidepoint Global LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2022

I want to clean house all the time and get new people in. Maybe, but I just don't see how that can win on summary judgment. … The mechanism of summary judgment is to act as gatekeeper and say there either is or not enough probative evidence to present before the trier of fact.

Oral argument — United States v. Edwards

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 16, 2025

run or have already run for considerable periods of time? … And therefore, there is this air of an unusual sequence of events in the listing of hearings.

Oral argument — White Communications v. Synergies3 Tec Services

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 12, 2021

Can you fix it when you have an operating loss for a substantial period of time? How do you fix that? There was no evidence of an business, lost revenues. I don't, I didn't just lost revenues. … Was it aired to rely on Scott or not? Um, I don't believe so.

Oral argument — Dorman v. Madison County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 21, 2023

And secondly, it's clear that this entire matter was a part of the Madison County Courthouse over the last, over a year, two year period of time. … You can't create it out of literal thin air. Regarding the Morales case, again, I don't think it is appropriate here.

Oral argument — Gaffney v. Board of Trustees of the Orland Fire Protection District

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2010

Declaratory judgment, period. Is there a question about this? In my opinion, there isn't a question. … He's running out of air. You have to rescue him.