Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.49s
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Fabian Hernan Hernandez, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 4, 2026
Payne, 341 F.3d at 399. … Payne, 341 F.3d at 399.
Petition — Accuracy in Media, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1976
Reference to the legislative history of the *® 47 U.S.C. §399 (Supp. … FCC, 150 U.S.App.D.C. 339, 465 F.2d 519, 523-24 & n. 17 (1972); ef. 47 U.S.C. §405 (1970); Joseph v. FCC, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 207, 404 F.2d 207, 210 (1968).
425 U.S. 934Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1970
al banks under the National Bank Act as set forth in 19 U.S.C. §24. The pertinent provisions of this statute read as follows: “$24. Corporate powers of associations. … tions under [the National Bank] Act as set forth in 12 Us, Code §24.”
397 U.S. 150Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Max Fontes, Petitioner v. Arizona
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 31, 2025
New York, 399 U.S. 117, 12223 (1970) (Harlan, J., concurring in the result in Williams). … This error in approach was “not just wrong”—it was 24 “egregiously wrong.” Id. at 121, 132 (Kavanaugh, J., concurring in part).
Amicus Curiae Brief — NationsBank of North Carolina, N. A. v. Variable Annuity Life Insurance
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
Georgia Ass'n of Independent Insurance Agents, Inc., 399 F.2d 1010 (5th Cir. 1968). … Georgia Ass'n of Independent Insur- ance Agents, 399 F.2d 1010 (Sth Cir. 1968).
511 U.S. 1141Respondents Brief in Opposition — H. B. Ives Co. v. Commissioner
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief in Opposition · 1962
§ 1122, 24 Purdon’s Pa. Stat. Ann. § 11-1122 ....... 4,7 "$127, 24 Purdon’s Pa. Stat. Ann. $ 11-1127 00.0. § 1132, 24 Purdon’s Pa. Stat. … S..399 (1958), fod rom .
370 U.S. 904Amicus Curiae Brief — Scheidler v. National Organization for Women, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
Jd. at 399-400. … -24- That proposition is not only shocking, but contrary to this Court’s opinion in Green.
537 U.S. 393Supplemental Appendix — Cramer v. State Bar of Michigan
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Appendix · 1984
State case docket entries involved: December 30, 1976, Docket No. 56413, State Bar v Cramer, reported at: 399 Mich 116-161, 1-20-77 See companion case, State Bar v Cramer, 399 Mich 116-161 and see … Defendant -Daniel Robert Horn served reonaily ¥ Oakland County heriff's Dept Sheriff's return of service, filed, 3-26-75 4-30-75 5-8-75 5-16-75 5-16-75 7-24-75 7-24-75 6-12-81 6-15-81 11-23
466 U.S. 974Respondents Brief — McClure v. First National Bank of Lubbock
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1975
Rev., 86 F.2d 776 PU is: CIE canceiniesusciseckaconactoansiidekioctanaslcnpeinatnniaicouaniesiniminal 24 Campbell v. Carter Foundation Production Co., ee ee he Rea nee 24 Campbell v. … Schapiro, 334 F.S. 399 (4) (ED Mo., 1971).
420 U.S. 930Reply Brief — Lee v. County Court of Erie County
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1971
Driscoll, 399 F. 24-135 (1968) ....__ 7 United States v. Weisser, 428 F. 2d 932 (1969) ...... <a IN THE Supreme Court of the United States. ees No. 1570 October Term, 1970. … Umited States, 373 F. 24-710 (1967); Battle v. Cameron, 260 °F. Supp. 804 (1966) ; United States v. Driscoll, 399 FP. 2d 135 (1968). 7 ao 4 % _Stitutional rights, either state or federal.
404 U.S. 823Jurisdictional Statement — Able v. Delaware
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1980
Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 399 (1966) In Re Five Minor Children, 407 A. 2d 198 (1979) prob. juris. noted sub nom., Doe v. Delaware, No. 79-5932 48 U.S.L.W. 3613 (U.S. … MARCH 24, 1980), IS SUBSTANTIAL THE DELAWARE TPR STATUTE IS UNCONSTITUTIONALLY VAGUE AND INDEFINITE.
446 U.S. 963Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978
McKeithen, 490 F.2d 191, 197 n. 24 (Sth Cir. 1973). … McKeithen, 490 F.2d 191, 197 n. 24 (Sth Cir. 1973).
437 U.S. 535Respondents Brief — Herring v. New York
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1975
United States, 399 F. 2d 467 (5th Cir., 1968), cert. denied 393 U. S. 1102 (1969) 8,9 Winship, Matter of, 397 U. … United States, 399 F. 2d 467, 470 (5th Cir., 1968), cert. denied 393 U.
422 U.S. 853Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1975
Lehtin, 399 U.S. 522, 90 S.Ct. 2238 (ADO9) neu ne an Sees cen sees vedeiceeace,. 5 Mitchell v. … Lehtin, 399 U.S. 522, 99 S.Ct. 2238 (1969) ; Mitchell v.
422 U.S. 289Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Alexi Ortiz, Petitioner v. Alfred D. Walsh, Jr.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 21, 2021
Mad, 97, 111 (2007); and itis further, ORDERED, that this case remain closed, BLY gue a SRA arte var E-FILED Court of Special Appeals Gregory Hilton 8/24/2020 1:06 PM IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS … Quillens, 399 Mad. at 124-25; Canaj, 391 Md. at 396. Because Mr.
Petitioners Reply Brief — Arkansas v. Sanders
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1979
Chadwick, 433 U.S. at 22-24, 97 S. Ct. 2476 (Blackmun, J., dissen- ting). … Maroney, 399 U.S. at 44.
442 U.S. 753Reply Brief of the Respondent — Reed v. Allen
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief of the Respondent · 1932
Kindred, 4 Wall. 399 10 Bird v. Cross 123 Tenn. 419 10 Breon v. Robrecht, 118 Cal. 469 | 10 Foster v. Evans, 51 Mo. 39...... | -10. Gore v. Gore, 101 Tenn. 620, 624m 10 Hawley v. … KINDRED : a: Wall. 399 ah e __ MERRYMAN V. BOURNE ; 9 Wall. 592, 599. - WATSON V. JONES : 80 U. S. 679. C ~_ Birp v. Cross 123 Tenn. 419. * - GORE V. GORE ° 104 Tenn. 620, 624. BREON V.
286 U.S. 191Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Rivera v. Sheriff
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1999
Sisson, 399 U.S. 267 (1970)? 2. … Cir. 1992) 15 437 U.S. 82 (1978) a2, 15, i9 ‘ 399 U.S. 267 (1970) a2, 19, 20 n j P 497 U.S. 639 (1990) 15 U.S. Const., 4th Amendment 24 U.S.
527 U.S. 1022Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Yee v. Shiawassee County Board of Commissioners
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2003
App. 379, 383- 391, 393, 399-400; 651 N.W.2d 156 (RUBE. « .+s0skssrsceeeael 1, 2, 4-10, 10, 13, 15, 16 +209 hha Ak uke 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 Yee v. … Cotemt, Aas SIV... occ cccoesceeeces se. 1, 3, 20, 21, 24, 26, 28 Michigan Statutes MCL § 213.52; MSA § 8.265(2)........ 13, 23-24, 24, 26, 28 The Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act
540 U.S. 1004Supreme Court brief · Brief in Opposition to Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1967
. - On the morning of April’ 24, nn ne ~ s ee ae or _ (taking the view of the evidence most favor- “able to plaintiff) tripped and fell at home, break-’ ing his hip. … Baker, 5 Cir: : 1964, 324 F.2d 213; 5 Meore, FederakePractice ' 150.06 at Ps 2350 (2d Ed. 1966). ” 376 F.2d at 399.
389 U.S. 1005
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.