Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.21s
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; DelawareEmission Statement Program
Federal Register · Rule · Feb 28, 1996
The intended effect of this action is to approve a regulation for annual reporting of actual emissions by sources that emit VOC and/or NOX within the state in accordance with the 1990 Clean Air Act (CAA … Background The air quality planning and SIP requirements for ozone nonattainment and transport areas are set out in subparts I and II of part D of title I of the CAA, as amended by the Clean Air Act
61 FR 7415Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jun 13, 1996
This action is being taken under Section 110 of the Clean Air Act. DATES: This final rule is effective July 29, 1996 unless within July 15, 1996, adverse or critical comments are received. … The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
61 FR 29963Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 18, 2012
Public Comments EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, the following parties submitted comments: 1. … Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by December 17, 2012.
77 FR 64036Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 15, 2012
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
77 FR 15263Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Ohio; PBR and PTIO
Federal Register · Rule · Oct 1, 2012
Air Act. … Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act and applicable Federal regulations
77 FR 59751Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Dec 21, 2016
area to attainment for the 2008 ozone NAAQS because the area meets the statutory requirements for redesignation under the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). … What comments did we receive on the proposed rule? EPA provided a 30-day review and comment period for the September 28, 2016, proposed rule. The comment period ended on October 28, 2016.
81 FR 93631Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 27, 2012
Final EPA approval of the regulations and incorporation of them into the Arizona SIP would make them federally enforceable under the Clean Air Act (CAA). … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
77 FR 38246Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Massachusetts; Regional Haze Five-Year Progress Report State Implementation Plan
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 1, 2019
This revision addresses the requirements of the Clean Air Act and its implementing regulations that states submit periodic reports describing progress toward reasonable progress goals established for regional … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
84 FR 1021Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · May 12, 2020
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. … of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and • Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority to address disproportionate
85 FR 27976Environmental Protection AgencyApproval of Implementation Plans of Alabama: Clean Air Interstate Rule
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 12, 2007
It does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
72 FR 38045Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · May 6, 1997
The intended effect of finalizing this action is to regulate emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act) … Background On March 3, 1978, EPA promulgated a list of ozone nonattainment areas under the provisions of the Clean Air Act, as amended in l977 (1977 Act or pre-amended Act), that included the Los
62 FR 24574Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · May 8, 2006
EPA is proposing to approve these revisions in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
71 FR 26688Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 14, 2009
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
74 FR 1903Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 28, 2000
The State submitted this portion of the implementation plan to satisfy Clean Air Act (the Act) requirements for adoption of rules for the application of reasonably available control technology (RACT) for … Air Act.
65 FR 24875Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Sep 12, 1995
The intended effect of approving this rule is to regulate emissions of VOCs in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … Background On March 3, 1978, EPA promulgated a list of ozone nonattainment areas under the provisions of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1977 (1977 Act or pre-amended Act), that included a portion
60 FR 47273Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 25, 2009
On April 25, 2007 (70 FR 20586), we promulgated the Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule regarding the Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements for State and Tribal plans to implement the 1997 PM 2.5 … In recognition of these issues, the Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule contains provisions establishing a transition period for developing emission limits for condensable direct PM 2.5 that
74 FR 12970Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Nov 9, 2023
of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act. … Air Act (CAA or Act) with respect to the 2008 8-hour ozone standard
88 FR 77208Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 2, 2003
In reviewing 111(d)/129 plan submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. … Air Act.
68 FR 50Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · May 21, 2004
EPA's authority to approve New Jersey's enhanced I/M program is set forth at sections 110 and 182 of the Clean Air Act. IV. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
69 FR 29234Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Feb 18, 2014
EPA is approving these revisions in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA). … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
79 FR 9097Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.