Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
2.43s
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 10, 2026
Air Act (CAA) for the 2015 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). … of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act.
91 FR 18347Environmental Protection AgencyTribal code · Tribal code
Air Policy to the Clean Air law; and BC Resolution # 02-14-24-A Amendments to the Clean Air Policy Page 2 of 2 WHEREAS, the Legislative Operating Committee developed the proposed amendments to the … , and the public comment period for the amendments to this Law was held open until December 26, 2023, with four (4) individuals providing written comments; and WHEREAS, the Legislative Operating Committee
Approval of California Air Plan; Owens Valley Serious Area Plan for the 1987 24-Hour PM10 Standard
Federal Register · Rule · Mar 13, 2017
Public Comments and the EPA's Response to Comments The EPA provided a 30-day public comment period on our proposed action. The comment period ended on January 11, 2017. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
82 FR 13390Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 7, 2014
Appropriately, EPA has simply reviewed ODEQ's BART analysis for consistency with the Clean Air Act and the BART Guidelines.” … Comment: We received one comment in support of the proposed action, which indicated that the Oklahoma RH SIP revision submittal satisfies EPA's and ODEQ's obligations under the Clean Air Act.
79 FR 12944Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Michigan
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 19, 2013
Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline identified. II. What action is EPA taking? … Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act and applicable Federal regulations
78 FR 50369Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Feb 10, 2004
MOBILE-based inventories are also used in demonstrating how the Clean Air Act's (the Act's) requirements for SIPs and transportation conformity are met. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
69 FR 6160Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 12, 2002
The Clean Air Act requires states to attain and maintain ambient air quality equal to or better than the NAAQS. … Air Act Amendments.
67 FR 17939Environmental Protection AgencyNotice of Approval for Other Use of Phosphogypsum
Federal Register · Notice · Dec 23, 2024
The Agency's review found that Mosaic's request is complete per the requirements of EPA's National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants under the Clean Air Act, and that the potential radiological … The EPA's regulations under the Clean Air Act at 40 CFR part 61, subpart R (hereafter “Subpart R”) require that phosphogypsum must be disposed of in engineered piles, called stacks, to limit public exposure
89 FR 104535Environmental Protection AgencyTreatment of Data Influenced by Exceptional Events
Federal Register · Rule · Mar 22, 2007
AQS Air Quality System. BACM Best Available Control Measures. CAA Clean Air Act. CAAA Clean Air Act Amendments. EPA Environmental Protection Agency. FEM Federal Equivalent Methods. … Comments and Responses Comment: Several commenters indicated that EPA should limit the time period associated with clean-up activities due to a natural disaster.
72 FR 13560Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Feb 1, 1995
This revision was submitted to comply with the RACT ``Catch-up'' provisions of the Clean Air Act (the Act). There are two intended effects of this action. … Background The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 were enacted on November 15, 1990. Public Law 101-549, 104 Stat. 2399, codified at 42 U.S.C. 7401- 7671q.
60 FR 6022Environmental Protection AgencyRevisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District
Federal Register · Rule · Feb 12, 2002
Public Comments and EPA Responses EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received a comment from the SCAQMD correcting the adoption date for Rule 109. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
67 FR 6410Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; New Hampshire; Regional Haze
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 22, 2012
The NPS commented that Clean Air Markets data indicates that MK1 is not meeting the 0.15 lb/MMBtu target. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
77 FR 50602Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Dec 17, 2018
The public comment period for this proposed rulemaking ended on October 29, 2018. The EPA received one comment from an anonymous commenter. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
83 FR 64470Environmental Protection AgencyRevisions to the Arizona State Implementation Plan, Maricopa County Area
Federal Register · Rule · Mar 31, 2014
We are approving local statutes that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). DATES: This rule is effective on April 30, 2014. … Public Comments and EPA Responses EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received no comments. III. EPA Action No comments were submitted.
79 FR 17878Environmental Protection AgencyAir Quality: EPA’s 2006 Changes to the Particulate Matter (PM) Standards
Congressional research report · CRS Report · Apr 17, 2008
Committee, or CASAC) mandated under the Clean Air Act. … Circuit challenging 1 Sections 108-109 of the Clean Air Act.
RL33254Congressional Research ServiceFederal Register · Rule · Mar 24, 2020
These revisions concern the District's New Source Review (NSR) permitting program for new and modified sources of air pollution under section 110(a)(2)(C) of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … Public Comments and EPA Responses The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. We received two comments during this public comment period.
85 FR 16555Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Notice · Feb 24, 2023
Public comments were previously requested via the Federal Register on August 26, 2022, during a 60-day comment period (87 FR 52552). … Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (section 114(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7414(a)(1)). Estimated number of respondents: 117 (total).
88 FR 11915Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · May 9, 2022
Public Comments and EPA Responses The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. … We received three comments during this period, and each one was supportive of this proposed action. III.
87 FR 27526Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; New York: Clean Air Interstate Rule
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 1, 2007
It does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
72 FR 55723Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 30, 2001
This action is being taken in accordance with the Clean Air Act. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before October 1, 2001. … Opening of the Public Comment Period The EPA is opening a comment period for 30 days to take comment on the Commonwealth's July 19, 2001 RACM submittal discussed above.
66 FR 45797Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.