Documents

Oral argument — PAMC, Ltd. v. Kathleen Sebelius

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2014

Well, there might be act of God. … So it's kind of a clean slate the following fiscal year. I think that's right, Your Honor. So unless the Court has any further questions.

Oral argument — United States v. Fox

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2022

Fox and escorts during the period, though, when the surveillance is in place. … In the government's theory, he should be patronizing escorts throughout this period.

Oral argument — Elouise Cobell v. Ryan Zinke

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 5, 2018

And he gave two reasons for excusing the violations, one of which is about the misquotation from the comment to the D.C. ethics rules, turning the meeting on its head. … It's all inextricably intertwined, and it was that – like for both practical purposes and under, I think, the clear reading or a clean reading of Rule 4 is what is now appealable.

Oral argument — Davin Hackett v. City of South Bend

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2020

Officer Hackett was serving in the Air Force Reserves, and his specialty was dealing with munitions. So he was very qualified for this type of assignment that he applied for. … And what about if it's not because he's in the military but because he invoked his rights under the Uniformed Services Act? That too, because that's the second section of the Act.

Oral argument — Jeffboat, Incorporated v. Director, OWCP

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 12, 2025

It doesn't matter for purposes of the Longshore Act. … Our lungs are comprised of tissue and then little pockets, little sacks of air that we all rely upon.

Oral argument — People v. Reyna

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 12, 2009

And you can't really expect a defendant who's untrained in the law, a layperson, to go out and search for acts of ineffectiveness, to identify acts of ineffectiveness. … So it seems to me, based upon a plein air argument, first of all, this is discretion, a discretionary finding at that time, and the record fully supports it.

Oral argument — HRT Ent v. City of Detroit MI

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 21, 2025

Well, it doesn't matter under Michigan law because remember it's Michigan law that controls under the Full Faith Inquiry Act. Then address Schaefer. … Delaware, that was a Clean Air Act or something along those lines.

Oral argument — Sanchez v. Keisler

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 14, 2008

But clearly – That's exactly what the BIA case says, is that the commission of this disqualifying act beyond the 10-year period, looking backward from the date of the final administrative decision – that … But the 10-year period that you would apply for whether or not they've maintained continuous residence is the exact 10-year period you should be applying in determining the period for good moral character

Oral argument — committievpricewaterhousecoopers

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

It's really, in one sense, when you think about it, don't you really go back to Judge Posner's comments in Senko? … And you heard my comment that I don't want to screw up responding and superior laws.

Oral argument — Cause of Action Institute v. OMB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2020

I question whether they use it within the terms of the act. … Here, we had the agency doubling the retention period from the defaults.

Oral argument — FIRST, BECK v. BANK OF SOUTHWEST

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2007

I didn't understand after the apostrophe in the Court's comment. … I mean, you just don't pull it out of the air.

Oral argument — Windt v. Qwest Comm

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

The judge made a fundamental mistake both as to the existence of the proceedings that he commented on because he was dead wrong about that in terms of judging. … Well, actually, it's an important question because, of course, Judge Brown, Judge Brown was aired on the side of caution and assumed that the case would improve the RICO for precisely that reason.

Oral argument — B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2014

Chief Justice, and may it please the Court, the Lanham Act contains only one concept of likelihood of confusion. … And the material standard is not just drawn from thin air.

Oral argument — Optimum Productions v. Home Box Office

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2020

You know, so the day, so, and so let's say there was a disparagement slash non-confidentiality claim within the period you're saying, et cetera. Do you think that would need to be arbitrated? … Anytime HBO airs anything that could be construed as disparaging. I can't see what the parties agree. Sure.

Oral argument — Fahie v. People of VI

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2016

We want to put this person up and make them as clean as possible. So there'll be an accessory after the fact. … Caddy has said, you pursued a fact FOIA was, uh, acting, uh, uh, on his own at the time the crime was committed.

Oral argument — Coppert v. Cassens Transport Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 25, 2014

Well, I think the transcending thing, do you want to comment on, obviously, the overarching issue is the propriety of the trial court's granting of the summons? … I mean, didn't the court kind of pick this number out of thin air, 3,500? It must have because it didn't come from us. Right. It didn't come from anywhere.

Oral argument — La Loma Grande, LLC v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 18, 2018

It was one of eight attorneys that made that comment, Your Honor. The others pursued it in full, robustly, much to the – It wasn't tried. Well, the DEC action was tried. … Now, the appellate looks now to the Equal Access to Justice Act to extend and get past the Federal Tort Claims Act limits.

Oral argument — Vivint, Inc. v. Alarm.com Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2018

This particular air conditioning unit is not working. But that doesn't mean you're remotely configuring anything. … So if you have a comment on that, go ahead. If not, we'll close it up.

Oral argument — Neil Goldberg v. James Cameron

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2017

Then after my client inquired about it, they put it back in, and that was the last act in the conspiracy which re-triggered all the state statutes. … I can't comment on that. All I know is that for purposes of analyzing removal, we have to look at what was served on the parties. It is clear from the federal removal statutes itself.

Oral argument — United States v. Ronald Jenkins, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2025

But, like, you know, that doesn't preclude a jury from concluding that, like, people often visit or live or stay for periods of time with their mother. … And he chose to shoot not just one shot up into the air, but he used a rifle and shot at least three to four rounds into the front of that house.