Documents

Brief Amicus Curiae — Blair v. Commissioner

Supreme Court brief · Brief Amicus Curiae · 1937

Helvering, 291 U.S. 35.........0...0. 2,4,5 Lucas v. Earl, 281 U.S. 111.................... 3, 6, 7, 9 Maguire v. Trefry, 253 U.S.12 ............ econ 3.6.7 Matter of Stanfield, 1385 N. … Commissioner, 33 Fed. [2d] 423 .... 3,8 Sentor v. Braden, 295 U.S. 422 .................. 3, 6 United States v. Fidelity Trust Co., 222 U.S. 158.. 3, 6,7 Uterhart v.

Opposition — Berry v. Judiciary Commission

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1977

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM, 1977 NO. 77-423 B.I. BERRY, JUDGE, ET AL. … II., 1970), aff'd 457 F.2d 279 (7th Cir. 1972), cert. den. 409 U.S. 1037, reh.den. 410 U.S. 947. V.

Respondents Brief — Shaw v. Murphy

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2001

Turner, 482 U.S., at 90. D. … Turner, 482 U.S., at 90; Abbott, 490 U.S., at 418.

Advisory Committee on Supply Chain Competitiveness Solicitation of Nominations for Membership

Federal Register · Notice · Dec 13, 2017

Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; phone 202-482-1135; email: richard.boll@trade.gov. … Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; phone 202-482-1135; email: richard.boll@trade.gov.

Opposition Brief — Chronicle Publishing Co. v. Rison

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1993

Seldin, 422 U.S. 490 (1975) .............ccccccccercccsceee 16 (IIT) IV Cases—Continued: Weinstein v. Bradford, 423 U.S. 147 (1975) .........ccccceeeeeee Wiggins v. … Lyons, 461 U.S. at 109; Weinstein v. Bradford, 423 U.S. 147 (1975).

Reply Brief — Ohio v. Veney (No. 08-1018)

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2009

Ballard, 66 Ohio St.2d 473, 423 ess icencscsotensersacccesecscecese 3-4 State v. Colon, 118 Ohio St.3d 26, 2008 Ohio 1624, 885 N.E.2d 917 (2008)............ 4 State v. … Ballard, 66 Ohio St.2d 473, 423 N.E.2d 115 (1981), which itself was a federal constitutional rul- 4 ing determining “what does Boykin require of a trial court.” Id. at 476, 423 N.E.2d at 117.

Opposition Brief — Reisch v. Sisney

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2010

(quoting Charles, 348 F.3d at 607); see also Cutter, 423 F.3d at O85. In Law v. … Laz, 414 U.S. at 569 (citation omitted).

Opposition — Bucuvalas v. Massachusetts

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1978

Locke, 423 U.S. 48 (1975) 7, 10 Thompson v. Louisville, 362 U.S. 199 (1960) 9 United States v. Harriss, 347 U.S. 612 (1954) 7 CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS. … Locke, 423 U.S. 48, 49 (1975), quoting from United States v. Harriss, 347 U.S. 612, 617 (1954).

Respondents Brief — Lewis v. Jeffers

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1990

Ricketts, 832 F.2d 476, 482-86 (9th Cir. 1987) (quoting Chaney vy. Lewis, 801 F.2d at 1191, 1193, 1195 (9th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 481 - 20 - U.S. 1023 (1987)). … §e¢ 832 F.24 at 482-83.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Altera Corporation & Subsidiaries, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 10, 2020

-U.S., Apr. 27, 1932, art. … IRS, Report on Application and Administration of Section 482 at 4-12 (1992).

Petitioners Brief — Kansas v. Carr, 135 S. Ct. 1698 (2015) (No. 14-449)

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 2015

JA 405-423. … JA 477-478, 481-482, 485-486, 489-490.

Monthly Notice; Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations

Federal Register · Notice · Feb 21, 2023

• Mail comments to: Office of Administration, Mail Stop: TWFN-7-A60M, U.S. … FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula Blechman, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S.

Appendix — Eklund v. Wheatland County

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2010

Ss upremo fs U.S. 09-426 OCT & - 2099 No. OFFICE OF THE CLERK In the Supreme Court of the United States DONALD S. EKLUND, Petitioner, v. … Co. 142, Mont. 220, 383 P.2d 482 (1963).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Boston & Maine Corp. v. Lenfest

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1987

L. 96-423 § 10, 94 Stat. 1811, 1815 (1980). LS eee 7 provide a shield [for] illegal general strikes.” (App. 30a). … Baker, 482 F.2d 228, 230 (6th Cir. 1978). 20 arbitrate and the duty not to strike [are] construed as having coterminous application.”

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — In re Aeroquip Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1996

Hermansdorfer, 423 U.S. 336, 353 (1976); Jamison v. Wiley, 14 F.3d 222, 234 (4th Cir. 1994). … Thermtron, 423 U.S. at 353 (quoting Railroad Co. v. Wiswall, 90 U.S. 507, 508 (1874)).

Reply Brief — Lorillard, Inc. v. Horowitz

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1998

Bupreme Court, U.S. … Danaher (1915) 238 U.S. 482, 490-91 (invalidating penalty under Due Process clause for conduct that involved “no inten- tional wrongdoing; no departure from any prescribed or known standard of action

Objection to Petition for Writ — Brasier v. City of Tulsa (No. 634)

Supreme Court brief · Objection to Petition for Writ · 1959

City of Jacksonville, or 5th Cir.) 188 F. 2d. 423. 72 S. … City of* Jacksonville, (Fla., 5th Cir.) 188 F. 2d 423. Aw rit, of certiorari was denied.. 72S. Ct. 5 » 96 L. Ed. 631, 242 U. S.-835. ; Proposition 2.

Reply Brief — Townsend v. Nassau County Medical Center

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1978

Morris Joan Bertin Lowy National Employment Law Project, Inc. 423 West 118th Street New York, New York 10027 JACK GREENBERG Eric ScHNAPPER Suite 2030 10 Columbus Circle New York, New York 10019 … Green, 411 U.S. 792, 806 (1973).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — U-Haul Co. v. Kunkle

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1999

STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED The provisions of 42 U.S.C. §§ 423(d)(1)(A), 423 (d)(2)(A), 12102(2), 12111(8), and 12112(a) are reproduced in Appendix H, beginning at App. 39a. … § 423, on the employee’s suit alleging a violation of the ADA.

UNITED STATES TAX COURT

Agency decision · Agency decision

Rul. 69-482, 1969-2 C.B. 164, is that these payments are capital gains; we therefore treat respondent's position in Rev. … Rul. 69-482, supra, has no application in this case. We find that the essential facts of Poole v.