Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.17s
Amicus Curiae Brief — GenBioPro, Inc., Applicant v. Louisiana, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 7, 2026
South Suite 250 Austin, Texas 78746 (512) 399-3022 heather@hackerstephens.com Counsel for Amicus Curiae TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Table of Authorities..................................................... … South Suite 250 Austin, Texas 78746 (512) 399-3022 heather@hackerstephens.com Counsel for Amicus Curiae Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America May 2026 15
Opposition Brief — United States House of Representatives, Petitioner v. Texas, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Feb 3, 2020
24(b). … under Rule 24(b).
Opposition Brief — California, et al., Petitioners v. Texas, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Feb 3, 2020
24(b). … under Rule 24(b).
Reply Brief — Louisiana, Appellant v. Phillip Callais, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Feb 20, 2025
Br.16, 24, 26. … Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 518 (2006) (LULAC) (Scalia, J., concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Allied-Signal, Inc. v. Director, Div. of Taxation
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
Tully, 466 U.S. 388 RES CLE aT ce ER A oe 24 Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox, 298 U.S. 193 (1936)... 10 Williams v. Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1980) ................. 16 Wisconsin v. J.C. … Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 127 (1970) (Harlan, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part).
504 U.S. 768Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1994
Green, 399 U.S. 149, 158 (1970) (quoting 5 J. Wigmore, Evidence § 1367, (3d ed. 1940)). … Green, 399 U.S. at 189, n.22 (concurring opinion)).
511 U.S. 1097Petition — Pennsylvania v. McCutchen
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1976
Yeager, 446 F.2d 1360 (3d Cir. 1971) 24 United States ex rel. McMath v. Pate, 435 F.2d 174 (7th Cir. 1970) 24 United States ex rel. Richardson v. … Vitek, 395 F.2d 478 (7th Cir. 1968) 24 West v. United States, 399 F.2d 467 (Sth Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1102 (1969) 22 STATE COURT CASES Commonwealth v.
424 U.S. 934Reply Brief — Kisor v. Wilkie, 139 S. Ct. 657 (2018) (No. 18-15)
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2018
Br. 24-25. And in United States v. … See also AFL-CIO Br. 23-24.
Reply Brief — Arthur J. Lomax, Petitioner v. Christina Ortiz-Marquez, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Feb 14, 2020
Br. 29; Council of State Governments Br. 22-24. That is manifestly wrong. … Br. 23-24; U.S. Br. 21-22; Council of State Governments Br. 24-25.
Opposition Brief — Peterson v. Stafford
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1993
Bd. of Election Comm'rs, 442 U.S. 918 (1979).............ce eee eee 24 Bohus v. Bd. of Election Comm’rs, 447 F.2d 821 (Fame Ce FT Baars cs oa ee ee ee ee ee 24 Bullock v. … Martin, 375 U.S. 399 (1964), where the candi- date’s race was required to be printed on the ballot.
507 U.S. 1033Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Thomas Eugene Creech, Petitioner v. Idaho
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 21, 2024
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) ............................................................... 9 Godfrey v. Mahoney, 2009 WL 5371196 (D. Mont. Nov. 24, 2009) ...................... 8 Graham v. … Id. at 24. Mr.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — George A. Pilola, Petitioner v. Craig Koenig, Acting Warden
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 24, 2022
Brown, 399 F.3d 972 (9th Cir. 2005). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Hohn v. … June 24. 2022 29 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _____________________________________ PILOLA v.
Opposition Brief — Paul David Storey, Petitioner v. Texas
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Apr 1, 2020
State, 841 S.W.2d 399 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)...................... 24 Thrift v. State, 176 S.W.3d 221 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) ................... 19, 23 Torres v. State, 976 S.W.2d 345 (Tex. App. … State, 841 S.W.2d 399, 404 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992).
Opposition Brief — Rodney Renia Young, Petitioner v. Georgia
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Jan 26, 2022
State, 653 S.E.2d 439 (2007) .............................................24 Williams v. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 416 (1986).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 1, 2020
See 24 P.S. § 13-1303.1-A; N.J.S.A. §§ 18A:37-16–17; 14 Del. Code §§ 4164, 9304. … Bell, 799 F.3d at 399. And “threatening, harassing, and intimidating a teacher impedes, if not destroys, the ability to teach; it impedes, if not destroys, the ability … to educate.” Id. at 399-400.
Opposition Brief — Kevin Stitt, Governor of Oklahoma, et al., Petitioners v. Rowan Fowler, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Apr 11, 2025
Illinois, 399 U.S. 235 (1970)..............................................23 Statutes Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 1-316.....................................4, 21 Okla. … Infra 21-24 (discussing, e.g., access to original records in Oklahoma; Oklahoma’s treatment of drivers’ licenses).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Keith Lashon Bell, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 30, 2026
United States, No. 24-1063 (petition for certiorari granted Oct. 10, 2025). … Fla., 399 U.S. 78, 90 S. Ct. 1893, 26 L.
Federal Register · Notice · Feb 11, 2015
Therefore, the Commission does not believe that the proposal will negatively impact quote competition or order flow on BOX. 24 Id. … SEC , 444 F.2d 399 (2d Cir. 1971); Arleen Hughes, 27 SEC 629, 636 (1948), aff'd sub nom. Hughes v. SEC, 174 F.2d 969 (D.C. Cir. 1949)).
80 FR 7663Securities and Exchange CommissionRespondents Brief — Madison v. Alabama, 138 S. Ct. 943 (2018) (No. 17-7505)
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2018
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986), and Panetti v. … Br. at 24.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Pendergast v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1943
S. 593, 24 L. Ed. 399, such agreement vested in petitioner an equitable right to have any prosecution for contempt stayed pending an application for executive clemency. … Phipps, 174 Wash. 443, 24 Pac. (2d) (Wash.) 1073.
317 U.S. 412
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.