Documents

Oral argument — People v. Parker

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2013

They didn't prove necessary below, and they admit that it was unnecessary in their brief, in their plain air argument. … Very quickly, with regard to the third issue, in this case, the court imposed consecutive sentences without comment.

Oral argument — Villetti v. Guidepoint Global LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2022

I want to clean house all the time and get new people in. Maybe, but I just don't see how that can win on summary judgment. … The mechanism of summary judgment is to act as gatekeeper and say there either is or not enough probative evidence to present before the trier of fact.

Oral argument — Texas Medical Association v. HHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2025

On the merits, to protect patients from ruinous surprise medical bills, Congress enacted the Surprise Act. … And for patients, the QPA can determine the cost-sharing responsibility, meaning a comment saying, oh, in terms of co-pay, or in terms of independent document.

Oral argument — Greenberg v. Lehocky

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2023

said that don't constitute severe and pervasive and you don't want lawyers saying that much less judges but in terms of your judicial ethics and all 46 46 states there is no severe pervasive requirement period … niffler said niffler wouldn't have said if that were the test niffler couldn't have said that there was a requirement to preserve an uninhibited marketplace of ideas in which professionals can freely air

Oral argument — Zachary Greenbergv.JerryM.Lehocky

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2023

But in terms of your judicial ethics and all 46 states, there is no severe or pervasive requirement, period. … It does include CLE, which is where I really want to spend most of my time and make most of my comments.

Oral argument — People v. Fields

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 17, 2022

without its constitutionality becoming suspect with a strict liability version of the foyd act absolutely raises both second and fifth amendment concerns a non-strict liability of the foyd act still has … of time for early stage alzheimer's a week later with a clean bill of health doesn't uh uh report it uh uh and she doesn't set up a forwarding address uh uh uh that's a second part of this and uh the

Oral argument — United States v. Repata-Garcia

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2006

Repata-Garcia committed an intentional act, that is, he voluntarily entered the United States. The District Court discussed this specific instruction, asked for comment by government counsel. … This is under neither of the United States subject to harmless air review.

Oral argument — Paulv.Hovensa

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2013

For every discreet act, the clock begins at the act, and that's it. That's the rule. … It involved a plaintiff who was trying to litigate old and state claims that occurred outside of the 300-day time period.

Oral argument — Joseph Fangsrud Von Esch v. Asset Systems, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 22, 2020

I know there've been some cases I've been on where a panel, may have prepared an opinion and then enter an order that its mandate would not enter, would mandate, would not issue for a period of time to … My fear is that because of the district court's comments about sanctioning this counsel to the tune of over six figures, that defense may be emboldened in a mediation setting until we clear the record

Oral argument — Flora McGuire v. City of Sweetwater TN

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2021

She did, even after that back off comment allegedly was made, she still went before the board in their workshop. She still was at the March 5th, 2018 meeting. … McGuire was allowed to have resigned, and I use air quotes on purpose, and receive insurance benefits. There was no formal adoption of that plan. So how did it come to be?

Oral argument — United States v. Ralph Garcia

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2022

So we're under a plain air review, right? That's correct, yes. So is it your position that he was never convicted? … So unless there are any further questions, we would ask that the Court affirm the conviction in the application of the act and remand for resentencing only with respect to the guidelines issue.

Oral argument — United States v. Jose Chavez-Pacheco

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2014

And as the federal courts have analyzed that in both Leocal and Fernandez-Ruiz, it requires a purposeful act, some act that is intended to accomplish a particular outcome. … Then the person who committed the crime in the intervening period gets deported.

Oral argument — Bank of New York Mellon v. SFR Investment Pool, 1, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2024

She essentially consolidated the cases and then allowed Bank of New York Mellon to essentially wipe the slate clean of the 2019 complaint, supplant it with the 2018 complaint, and then that rendered the … There were a couple of trial payments in the 2011 time period, but I don't recall precisely whether those payments were actually made or if there was just a negotiation among the parties.

Oral argument — People v. Berg

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2019

There was a period of several hours that Mr. Berg was out of the house as well as Brittany and her friend were out of the house for another hour. And it was after Mr. … It could have been cleaning a gun. So neither of those things establishes any probable cause. And without probable cause, there is no exigent circumstances.

Oral argument — Sanchez v. Keisler

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 14, 2008

But clearly – That's exactly what the BIA case says, is that the commission of this disqualifying act beyond the 10-year period, looking backward from the date of the final administrative decision – that … But the 10-year period that you would apply for whether or not they've maintained continuous residence is the exact 10-year period you should be applying in determining the period for good moral character

Oral argument — United States v. Charlise Williams

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2018

These witnesses were presented to the jury as squeaky clean, as they had no issue and no potential bias. That is what was fronted by the government. … The numerous fraudulent acts that Charlize Williams committed during this period of time, as well as her failure at all to essentially pay any of these bankruptcy court approved repayment plans, demonstrates

Oral argument — Patrick Caldwell v. Victoria Nelson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2017

Well, if he was acting as the managing member of the limited liability company and was acting in that capacity, then he could make that transfer. … In that case, the property was clearly owned outside of the 1,215 day period, and it was the mere act of recording the homestead declaration, which in Nevada is a way to perfect the entitlement to the

Oral argument — Marriage of Leitzen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 18, 2023

Certainly, our legislature would have included provisions within the very specific section of 5032 of the act if this were intended. … Secondly, this court's already commented on the fact, and this was raised at trial, what did Mr. Leitzen give up?

Oral argument — United States v. Kenneth Olsen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 30, 2012

It was a unique time period It was right it occurred actually right before 9-11 So the United States did have the requirement to prove that he possessed it with the intent to use it as a weapon and I want … They were sent to clean out the defendants cubicle They found these items. They touched them with bare hands. They picked them up.

Oral argument — United States v. Todd Boyd

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2026

The court, in that footnote, it precedes its comments and says, we do not consider arguments that are first raised in oral argument. … Am I correct that these issues are presented to us on plain air review? That is correct. Okay.