Documents

Oral argument — Judith Mottle Kerr Trust v. Holm

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2017

4 of the Fence Act. … I guess what I would like to do is initially begin on some of the comments that were presented here today and respond to Mr. Carroll's comments about the Fence Act and the like.

Oral argument — Strife v. AISD

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2025

I've got to work in the heat and somebody else gets to work under air conditioning. We are literally talking environments. Go ahead. … I mean, the delay has to do with facts, and that's what was going on during that six-month period. Correct.

Oral argument — Barraza de Henriquez v. Garland

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2024

So there was really no detail about kind of the interim period there, and she was never asked. So there was really no inconsistency. … Does it mean that he saw any pretended or he acted as if nothing was happening because, well, he acted as if nothing was happening because he didn't realize anything was happening?

Oral argument — WELLMAN INC v. EASTMAN CHEMICAL

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2010

Well, Your Honor, the point here is you've got two clean admissions from Nichols. You've got admissions from other of the inventors. … They never used spinel, period. So to say that we were going to have to come away from the HUR being carbon black, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Frey v. Town of Jackson, WY

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2021

So these proceedings don't arrive with the kind of clean record that Iqbal and Twombly normally encompass, where the District Court is simply looking at the four corners of the complaint. … Just a few comments in response to Apolli's arguments. I first want to just express our stringent disagreement with the characterization of the record on the attorney's fees and sanctions.

Oral argument — IN RE RIGGS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2011

You go up to the Board and it's all very clean. You file an appeal. They file an answer. You don't bring anything up new in your answer, so there's no cert reply and you lose when you come here. … Some of the supporting comments are different. The rejection under 35 U.S.C. 12, second paragraph is verbatim the same as the rejection that was in the case before.

Oral argument — Blaskovic v. Ashcroft

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 2, 2004

But according to his testimony, which wasn't said to be incredible, that the Air Force said he would be assassinated if war broke out, you know, because his father had been a — I guess because his father … Now, on exhaustion, the I.J. directed comments to the petitioners saying, if you had been present here for the required time, you might be eligible for the other relief, right? Yes, Your Honor.

Oral argument — United States v. Dawayne Brown

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 23, 2018

It was merely asking that it run concurrent that period of time which the sentencing enhancement had imposed to the sentence that the Superior Court had imposed. … The prosecutor cleaned that up. Our submission to the court is in this case, four pages later, the defense attorney cleaned it up.

Oral argument — Cronholm v. Board of Trustees of the Lockport Township FPD Firefighters' Pension Fund

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2020

He wants to keep both sides of the seesaw up in the air. The Court should overrule Cronholm's objections to the Lockport Fund's correction and affirm its decision for at least the following reasons. … He can't surmount the fact that the statute of limitations does not apply to governmental entities like the Lockport Fund acting in its public capacity.

Oral argument — United States v. Brothers/Barker

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2007

And it covered a period of time from roughly December of 2002, January of 2003, up until the date of that indictment in May of 2003. … And the testimony was undisputed that Pitch received illegal drugs from Bryan over that entire period of time.

Oral argument — People v. Borders

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 25, 2022

insofar as a judicial determination regarding the propriety of a seizure is concerned, there's no doctrine that simply allows an officer to act in good faith on the word of another officer. … And when we look at Watts's call log for the same period of time, it does not reflect an incoming call from Stokes at one forty two.

Oral argument — Merritt Hawkins & Associates v. Larry Gresham, et

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2017

He pulled it totally out of the air, da-da-da-da, but jury does what they do. And so you get something that maybe is logical, but where is it inherently so defective? … Gresham over the 12-month period, and his non-compete runs for 12 months. That's the amount of profit the company lost.

Oral argument — United States v. Kenneth Hart

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2023

That's still up in the air. And how do we get in this posture? So what I'll say, Your Honor, is I think the court specifically ruled on the pro se motion. … He had ruled on seven of the motions to continue over that two-and-a-half-year period.

Oral argument — Speech First, Inc. v. Timothy Sands

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 25, 2022

That was a comment about standing in the context of Abbott, and the Court has said it in other cases as well. Now, they realize there are no rules that prohibit protected speech. … your room, or can you please clean your room.

Oral argument — Joyce McKiver v. Murphy-Brown, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 31, 2020

In other words, they're just these open air lagoons that weren't covered. … That act clarified that under North Carolina law, the measure of damage is loss of property value, not discomfort. But the Right to Farm Act doesn't apply here. You would agree with that, would you?

Oral argument — Napcor Corporation v. JPMorgan Chase Kane Bank

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 17, 2010

Janke to act. The bank doesn't dispute any of those facts, and they're not an issue on their appeal here today. … Some of the first problems occur within a short period of time, over a 10-year span, a short period of time with that first, I think, blow-off, and then there were some other blow-offs.

Oral argument — People v. Schiller

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 29, 2012

And if the claim is a clean claim, it comes back here and there's nothing more. The case is over. But if he doesn't offer more, then obviously the familial should have accused himself at that point. … That's an appearance of impropriety that deserves some comment, some response from the judge. But nobody requested any comment?

Oral argument — KELLOGG v. NIKE

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 6, 2011

It had to be acted on by the court. The court granted our motion without any conditions. … This was an effort to streamline the presentation of our case, period.

Oral argument — ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN v. CANADY TECHNO

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2010

It alleged a conspiracy to violate Section 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act. … So you have competing interests under the Patent Act that also are at play here.

Oral argument — United States v. Eric Brown

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 18, 2020

And so starting over may just be the best way to start with a clean slate. … There was about a four-month period, I believe, while he was evaluated by the defense's experts. And also during that period, that was when Dr.