Documents

Oral argument — Zachary Greenbergv.JerryM.Lehocky

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2023

But in terms of your judicial ethics and all 46 states, there is no severe or pervasive requirement, period. … It does include CLE, which is where I really want to spend most of my time and make most of my comments.

Oral argument — Greenberg v. Lehocky

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2023

said that don't constitute severe and pervasive and you don't want lawyers saying that much less judges but in terms of your judicial ethics and all 46 46 states there is no severe pervasive requirement period … niffler said niffler wouldn't have said if that were the test niffler couldn't have said that there was a requirement to preserve an uninhibited marketplace of ideas in which professionals can freely air

Oral argument — Joyce Higgs v. Costa Crociere S.P.A.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2017

And then these other allegedly egregious comments are made and not so much of a sound comes from Counsel Table for Costa in response. … Period. Yes, sir. Yes, sir. If we look at the motion in limine, it says that. The judge says I'm going to grant the motion.

Oral argument — Sanchez v. Holder

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 16, 2008

But clearly – That's exactly what the BIA case says, is that the commission of this disqualifying act beyond the 10-year period, looking backward from the date of the final administrative decision – that … But the 10-year period that you would apply for whether or not they've maintained continuous residence is the exact 10-year period you should be applying in determining the period for good moral character

Oral argument — Snyder & Associates Aquisition v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2017

But the—but the—but the comments made by the IRS that revealed some confidential information took place after that investigation. The tax investigation was over. Right. … You're taking the position here that you're just immune, period. So we haven't gotten to any of that yet.

Oral argument — People v. Cox

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2019

The appellant asks this Court to consider the Child Advocacy Act, 55 ILCS 80-1. … Both involved acts of penetration, penis to vagina.

Oral argument — Roberto Maldonado v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2014

Why isn't the correct analysis, the last known act and the last official act we have, is that he has been taken out of the jurisdiction of the United States? He's been removed. … I was going to say, in cleaning up our case, you didn't mention anything about Limas-Galvan in cleaning up our case law. Well, with respect to the jurisdictional issue. No, no, no. The impossibility.

Oral argument — Dejon White v. State of California

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 18, 2019

And so therefore, he's not acting in a vacuum. He's acting because the two officers brought this information to him. So therefore, they're the two officers who are discriminating. … But I direct you to Officer Pender's declaration because most of the hearsay statements were attributed to her having overheard comments made by Warren and Panisi.

Oral argument — Spiegel v. Estee Lauder Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 25, 2025

Our position is that we don't need to establish the actual acts at the time that the complaint is filed. … That over the time period, the company was aware of the fact that she was coming in early. And the reason she- No, it's early. We don't have, I normally arrived at 9 o'clock.

Oral argument — First Midwest Bank v. Rossi

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 14, 2023

The last negligent act is alleged on 12-24-07 when Cindy went into a coma. … What we see in the green case from Massachusetts 12% for the day of filing with no one year grace period like we have with no offset for an offer made.

Oral argument — IN RE RIGGS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2011

You go up to the Board and it's all very clean. You file an appeal. They file an answer. You don't bring anything up new in your answer, so there's no cert reply and you lose when you come here. … Some of the supporting comments are different. The rejection under 35 U.S.C. 12, second paragraph is verbatim the same as the rejection that was in the case before.

Oral argument — People v. Parker

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2013

They didn't prove necessary below, and they admit that it was unnecessary in their brief, in their plain air argument. … Very quickly, with regard to the third issue, in this case, the court imposed consecutive sentences without comment.

Oral argument — Umpqua Valley Audubon Society v. FERC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 3, 2005

comments to the petitioners whenever they commented. … In fact, that's what is done in other similar situations where, for example, a licensee or other party is challenging the conditions of a Clean Water Act certification under Section 401 in state court.

Oral argument — Kelly Fuery v. City of Chicago

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 16, 2018

I understand, but it permeated the air. … It permeated the air.

Oral argument — United States v. Brothers/Barker

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2007

And it covered a period of time from roughly December of 2002, January of 2003, up until the date of that indictment in May of 2003. … And the testimony was undisputed that Pitch received illegal drugs from Bryan over that entire period of time.

Oral argument — Obie v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2025

And the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, in the findings at the opening, Congress says that religiously neutral acts can interfere with the exercise of religion as much as purposeful acts. … And what he says is, I'm quoting here, if the CFTC cleans up its act, ends its culture of retaliation, and stops trying to ban prayer, I will consider a return.

Oral argument — United States v. McQueary, II

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 26, 2024

But, again, whether the hospital acted in good or bad faith in this case is irrelevant because there was no agency relationship. … For example, they tell the hospital, you are now going to retain these videos for a certain period of time, and we have an agreement from you to do that.

Oral argument — Schick v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2008

Well, the hearing is provided for in Section 641D of the Act. … In the event that they do produce it within the required time period, it will not be revoked. So you're saying that the language is and may thereafter be revoked is not really discretionary.

Oral argument — United States v. Walter Mabry

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 20, 2020

We submit that that isn't a judge Friedman certainly did not air in concluding that it was not a show of authority. … And I don't think that, you know, the unilateral act of the person on the sidewalk renders what would otherwise be a consensual encounter to a non-consensual one. I just have a technical question.

Oral argument — Bell v. Don Prudhome Racing

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 17, 2010

It was a down period. There was no drag racing taking place around the country at the time. So he's at home. His residence was in Illinois? Yes, it was. Okay. He was at home during this time period. … What if he or she is driving from one state to another or in the air flying over states? Why would – because they have their cell phone and are in Indiana versus Illinois versus Florida.