Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filters2012

10,000+ results

0.11s

  • Petitioners Brief — Water Splash, Inc. v. Menon, 137 S. Ct. 1240 (2017) (No. 16-254)

    Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 2017

    Co., Inc., 722 8.W.2d 399, 401 (Tex. 1986). * Tex. R. Civ. … J.A. 1; C.R. 303-24.

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Colorado, Petitioner v. Bernardino Fuentes-Espinoza

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 29, 2018

    See Arizona, 567 U.S. at 399. 10a ¶24 A state law is expressly preempted when Congress “withdraw[s] specified powers from the States by enacting a statute containing an express preemption provision.” … See Arizona, 567 U.S. at 399.

  • Statement as to jurisdiction — Wes Allen, Alabama Secretary of State, et al., Appellants v. Evan Milligan, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Statement as to jurisdiction · Jan 28, 2022

    , 2022; preliminary injunction entered January 24, 2022; stay denied January 27, 2022. … NRDC, 555 U.S. 7, 24 (2008); see Mac Govern v. Connolly, 637 F. Supp. 111, 116 (D.

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Crawford v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1998

    I, p. 399, L. 19-24). He was subsequently released on bail until his sentencing hearing on October 3, 1996. Judge Kiser sentenced Mr. Crawford to 51 months imprisonment (JA., Vol. … In the Holmes case, the defense had roughly twenty- four (24) hours to review approximately two thousand (2,000) pages which amounted to forty-three (43) seconds per page.

    522 U.S. 1117
  • Opposition — Ballew v. Georgia

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1978

    Wurzbach, 280 U.S. 396, 399 (1930). One who goes peril- ously close to an area of proscribed conduct shall take the risk that he may cross that line. Boyce Motor Lines, Inc. v. … Decided April 24, 1978); Sewell v. Georgia, 435 U.S. ______ (1978) (No. 76-1738. Decided April 24, 1978); and Teal v. Georgia, 435 “a —___.. (1978) (No. 77-790. Decided April 24, 1978).

    436 U.S. 962
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Robert Armendaris, Petitioner v. Arizona

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 5, 2026

    Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 86 (1970). More than 50 years ago, the United States Supreme Court ruled the Sixth Amendment does not require a 12-person jury. Id. … CR-25-0094-PR Court of Appeals, Division One No. 1 CA-CR 24-0267 Maricopa County Superior Court No.

  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Due to a lack of available treatment for his ongoing medical problems, petitioner departed Alaska on December 24 and returned to Nevada on or about December 27, 1991. … Memo. 1994-399; sec. 1.183-2(a), Income Tax Regs.

    United States Tax Court
  • Reply Brief — Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Huntley

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2000

    Norge Div. of Magic Chef, Inc., 486 U.S. 399, 407, 413 (1988). … FRITO-LAY, INC. 7701 Legacy Drive Plano, Texas 75024 (972) 334-3825 Dated: August 24, 2000

    531 U.S. 818
  • Brief in Opposition to Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Melquist v. Illinois

    Supreme Court brief · Brief in Opposition to Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1963

    page 2), even thongh he admits that the testimony with regard to the “floor” was in eonfliet. ( Petition, page 2 ° ’ - ~ of fact 3 Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores vo Ellerman Lines, 369 ULS Soo, 308-399 … A eor- a ix the “two court’ dgetrine, which militates strongly 24) against reviewing evidence when findings of facet have been concurred in hy the two courts below, Kw. . Corn Products Ret.

    372 U.S. 967
  • Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Angelus Funeral Home v. Commissioner

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1969

    The petition for a writ of certiorari was filed on May 24, 1969. The _ jurisdiction of this Court is inv oked under 28 U.S. … United States, 399 F. 2d 757 (CA, 7). certiorari denied, 393 U.S. 1118. .

    396 U.S. 824
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Naquan Reyes, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 6, 2020

    Williams, we said that review of a sentencing error is "fundamentally different" from review of a jury trial error. 399 F.3d at 456. … state in open court the reasons for its imposition of the particular sentence, and, if the sentence . . . is of the kind, and within.the range, described in subsection (a)(4), and that range iSxceeds 24

  • Supplemental Brief — William Earl Sweet, Petitioner v. Florida

    Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · Nov 17, 2020

    The Court ordered Sweet to respond, Doc. 24, which Sweet did on August 21, 2010, see Petitioner’s Response to Respondents’ Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Response; Doc. 27). … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986), that the petitioner was incompetent to be executed, because the claim was not ripe at the time the petitioner filed his original habeas petition.

  • Reply Brief — Colby McCoggle, Petitioner v. Florida

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Apr 10, 2025

    No. 24-6402 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES COLBY MCCOGGLE, PETITIONER v. … Williams, 399 F.3d 450, 456 (2d Cir. 2005)) (emphasis added). 4. The State’s cases support our position, not theirs.

  • Appellees Brief — Railway Labor Executives' Assn. v. Gibbons

    Supreme Court brief · Appellees Brief · 1982

    No. 96-254, 94 Stat. 399. … R., supra, 328 U.S. at 536, New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 U.S. 392, 491-92 (1970).

    455 U.S. 457
  • Petitioners Brief — Evangelisto Ramos, Petitioner v. Louisiana

    Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · Jun 11, 2019

    United States, 570 U.S. 99 (2015) .......................................... 24, 46 Am. Publ’g Co. v. Fisher, 166 U.S. 464 (1897) .................................. 19, 24, 25 Andres v. … Louisiana, 508 U.S. 275 (1993) ..............................................24 Taylor v. Louisiana, 419 U.S. 522 (1975) ..............................................24 Thompson v.

  • Opposition Brief — United States v. Updike

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1930

    P.M ee SG Wy WR Os nnd. ances cece cece 24 U.S. v. Snook, 24 Fed. PE MR ttn bde Vouk nduudsoowiciactce ee, oe 6 Wood v. Carpenter, 101 VU. … S. 399- 417.

    281 U.S. 489
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Samuel Blank v. State of California

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1974

    Massa- chusetts.” (413 U.S. at 24). … Pennsylvania, 382 U.S.399; Win- ters v. New York, 333 U.S.507.

    419 U.S. 913
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Casey Peebles, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 25, 2018

    V (Due Process Clause). . . . . . . . . . . 2, 13, 19, 22, 24, 26 U.S. Const. amend. … Inadi, 475 U.S. 387, 399 (1986); Bourjaily v. United States, 483 U.S. 171, 182 (1987).

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Demartinas L. Edwards, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 2, 2026

    Id. at 24. … June 24, 2024). Even beyond new prosecutions, § 922(g)(1)’s reach is staggering.

  • Opposition Brief — Ruel M. Hamilton, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Apr 23, 2025

    No. 24-902 In the Supreme Court of the United States RUEL M. HAMILTON, PETITIONER v. … The court of appeals remanded to the district court for further proceedings. 46 F.4th at 399.

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.