Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.04s
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 29, 1995
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This interim final rule changes the statutory authority for transportation conformity nitrogen oxides (NOX) exemptions from Clean Air Act section 182(f) to section 182(b)(1), … , facilitate the lawful and effective implementation of section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act.
60 FR 44762Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 18, 2012
We are approving local rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
77 FR 2469Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 18, 2014
We are approving these negative declarations under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). DATES: This rule will be effective on May 19, 2014. … Public Comments and EPA Responses EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
79 FR 21849Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jul 28, 2015
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
80 FR 44870Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Missouri; Removal of Obsolete Rules on Control of NOX Emissions
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 14, 2025
The EPA's approval of this rule revision is being done in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: This final rule is effective on September 15, 2025. … During this period, EPA received comments from four commenters.
90 FR 39128Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Wisconsin; VOC RACT Requirements for Lithographic Printing Facilities
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 25, 2020
For comments submitted at Regulations.gov , follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov . … “Cleaning solution” refers to all the printing press-related cleaning activities.
85 FR 60413Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 10, 2002
All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
67 FR 17286Environmental Protection AgencyOuter Continental Shelf Air Regulations; Consistency Update for California
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 10, 2010
”), as mandated by section 328(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (“the Act”). … Public Comment EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received no comments on the proposed action. III.
75 FR 55277Environmental Protection AgencyRevisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Bay Area Air Quality Management District
Federal Register · Rule · Oct 10, 2001
Under authority of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act), this action simultaneously approves local rules that regulate these emission sources and directs the BAAQMD to correct rule deficiencies … Public Comments and EPA Responses EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received no comments. III. EPA Action No comments were submitted.
66 FR 51568Environmental Protection AgencyRevision to the Arizona State Implementation Plan, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality
Federal Register · Rule · Mar 24, 2003
Public Comments and EPA Responses EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we did not receive any comments. III. … Air Act.
68 FR 14151Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 26, 1999
You may also request the opportunity to submit oral comments as allowed under Clean Air Act section 307(d)(5). EPA must receive your request for a public hearing by April 5, 1999. … The commenter on the 1998 FIP proposal read the Clean Air Act and EPA guidance to require contingency measures as a necessary part of a complete 15 percent ROP plan submittal.
64 FR 14659Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Enhanced Monitoring; California
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 28, 2017
Public Comments The EPA's proposed action on August 2, 2017, provided a 30-day public comment period ending on September 1, 2017. We received no comments on our proposed action. III. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
82 FR 45191Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jun 13, 1996
met the requirements set forth in the Clean Air Act (Act). … , upon enactment of the Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) of 1990 (the Act).1 Please reference 56 FR 56694 (November 6, 1991) and 57 FR 13498 and 13529 (April 16, 1992).
61 FR 29970Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Feb 28, 2012
These actions are being taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is effective on March 29, 2012. … Petitions for Judicial Review Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit
77 FR 11739Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Illinois
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 21, 1995
Docket: Pursuant to section 307(d)(1)(B) of the Clean Air Act (Act), 42 U.S.C. 7607(d)(1)(B), this action is subject to the procedural requirements of section 307(d). … At the conclusion of this additional public comment period, USEPA will publish a final rule responding to the public comments received and announcing final action.
60 FR 43394Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · May 2, 2014
This action does not constitute a redesignation to attainment under section 107(d)(3) of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … Joseph Minott representing the Clean Air Council.
79 FR 25014Environmental Protection AgencyIntegrated Science Assessment for Sulfur Oxides-Health Criteria
Federal Register · Notice · Dec 13, 2017
Information About the Document Section 108(a) of the Clean Air Act directs the Administrator to identify certain pollutants which, among other things, “cause or contribute to air pollution which may … The Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC), an independent science advisory committee whose review and advisory functions are mandated by Section 109(d)(2) of the Clean Air Act, is charged (among
82 FR 58600Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Wisconsin; Particulate Matter Standard
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 17, 2018
Public Comment A comment period was provided in the May 25, 2018, proposed rule (83 FR 24257). The comment period closed on June 25, 2018. … Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act and applicable Federal regulations
83 FR 46882Environmental Protection AgencyAppendix — Edison Electric Institute v. Costle
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1981
Clean Air Act § 801(a) (1). Under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq. … of future Clean Air Act litigation.
449 U.S. 1131Federal Register · Rule · Jun 16, 2017
We are approving local rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). DATES: These rules are effective on July 17, 2017. … Public Comments and EPA Responses The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received no comments. III. EPA Action No comments were submitted.
82 FR 27622Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.