Documents

Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Removal of Obsolete Rules on Control of NOX Emissions

Federal Register · Rule · Aug 14, 2025

The EPA's approval of this rule revision is being done in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: This final rule is effective on September 15, 2025. … During this period, EPA received comments from four commenters.

Air Plan Approval; Wisconsin; VOC RACT Requirements for Lithographic Printing Facilities

Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 25, 2020

For comments submitted at Regulations.gov , follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov . … “Cleaning solution” refers to all the printing press-related cleaning activities.

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans: Revision to the Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM) Administrative Code for the Air Pollution Control Program

Federal Register · Rule · Apr 10, 2002

All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.

Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District

Federal Register · Rule · Sep 23, 2010

We are approving local rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … Public Comments and EPA Responses EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received no comments. III.

Outer Continental Shelf Air Regulations; Consistency Update for California

Federal Register · Rule · Sep 10, 2010

”), as mandated by section 328(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (“the Act”). … Public Comment EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received no comments on the proposed action. III.

Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Bay Area Air Quality Management District

Federal Register · Rule · Oct 10, 2001

Under authority of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act), this action simultaneously approves local rules that regulate these emission sources and directs the BAAQMD to correct rule deficiencies … Public Comments and EPA Responses EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received no comments. III. EPA Action No comments were submitted.

Revision to the Arizona State Implementation Plan, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality

Federal Register · Rule · Mar 24, 2003

Public Comments and EPA Responses EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we did not receive any comments. III. … Air Act.

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Phoenix, Arizona Ozone Nonattainment Area, Revision to the 15 Percent Rate of Progress Plan

Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 26, 1999

You may also request the opportunity to submit oral comments as allowed under Clean Air Act section 307(d)(5). EPA must receive your request for a public hearing by April 5, 1999. … The commenter on the 1998 FIP proposal read the Clean Air Act and EPA guidance to require contingency measures as a necessary part of a complete 15 percent ROP plan submittal.

Final Determination to Extend Deadline for Promulgation of Action on Section 126 Petition From North Carolina

Federal Register · Rule · May 26, 2004

SUMMARY: The EPA is extending by six additional months the deadline for taking final action on a petition submitted by the State of North Carolina under section 126 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … On January 30, 2004 (69 FR 4566), EPA proposed the “Rule to Reduce Interstate Transport of Fine Particulate Matter and Ozone (Interstate Air Quality Rule),” now known as the Clean Air Interstate Rule.

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; District of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia; Determinations of Attainment of the 1997 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard for the Washington, DC-MD-VA 8-Hour Ozone Moderate Nonattainment Area

Federal Register · Rule · Feb 28, 2012

These actions are being taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is effective on March 29, 2012. … Petitions for Judicial Review Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Washington: Spokane Second 10-Year Carbon Monoxide Limited Maintenance Plan

Federal Register · Rule · Jul 14, 2016

The public comment period for this proposed rule ended on June 27, 2016. The EPA received no comments on the proposal. II. … The EPA's approval of this limited maintenance plan satisfies the Clean Air Act (CAA) section 175A requirements for the second 10-year period in the Spokane CO area. III.

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Illinois

Federal Register · Rule · Aug 21, 1995

Docket: Pursuant to section 307(d)(1)(B) of the Clean Air Act (Act), 42 U.S.C. 7607(d)(1)(B), this action is subject to the procedural requirements of section 307(d). … At the conclusion of this additional public comment period, USEPA will publish a final rule responding to the public comments received and announcing final action.

Oral argument — Sierra Club v. USEPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 16, 2011

Would it be, what would happen if we assumed that the Clean Air Act issue didn't have to be reached? … You know, once EPA acts to approve the measures, an interested party could challenge them under Section 307 of the Clean Air Act.

Air Plan Approval; Guam; Clean Data Determination for the Piti-Cabras Nonattainment Area for the 2010 1-Hour Sulfur Dioxide National Ambient Air Quality Standard

Federal Register · Rule · Sep 18, 2025

In designated nonattainment areas where air quality data demonstrate that a NAAQS has been attained, the EPA interprets certain requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) as no longer applicable for so long … Public Comments and EPA Responses The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received one comment unrelated to this action. III.

Appendix — Edison Electric Institute v. Costle

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1981

Clean Air Act § 801(a) (1). Under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq. … of future Clean Air Act litigation.

Air Plan Approvals; Indiana; Prong 4 (Visibility) for the 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard

Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 10, 2026

Air Act (CAA) for the 2015 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). … of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act.

Phone: (920)869-2214

Tribal code · Tribal code

Air Policy to the Clean Air law; and BC Resolution # 02-14-24-A Amendments to the Clean Air Policy Page 2 of 2 WHEREAS, the Legislative Operating Committee developed the proposed amendments to the … , and the public comment period for the amendments to this Law was held open until December 26, 2023, with four (4) individuals providing written comments; and WHEREAS, the Legislative Operating Committee

Approval of California Air Plan; Owens Valley Serious Area Plan for the 1987 24-Hour PM10 Standard

Federal Register · Rule · Mar 13, 2017

Public Comments and the EPA's Response to Comments The EPA provided a 30-day public comment period on our proposed action. The comment period ended on January 11, 2017. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Oklahoma; Regional Haze and Interstate Transport Affecting Visibility; State Implementation Plan Revisions; Revised BART Determination for American Electric Power/Public Service Company of Oklahoma Northeastern Power Station Units 3 and 4

Federal Register · Rule · Mar 7, 2014

Appropriately, EPA has simply reviewed ODEQ's BART analysis for consistency with the Clean Air Act and the BART Guidelines.” … Comment: We received one comment in support of the proposed action, which indicated that the Oklahoma RH SIP revision submittal satisfies EPA's and ODEQ's obligations under the Clean Air Act.

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Michigan

Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 19, 2013

Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline identified. II. What action is EPA taking? … Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act and applicable Federal regulations