Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
2,085 results
0.17s
Agency decision · Agency decision
Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 482 (1992) (quoting Richards v. United States, 369 U.S. 1, 9 (1962)); see also INS v. … Rossi, 456 U.S. 25, 32 (1982); Murray v. The Charming Betsy, 6 U.S. (2 Cranch) 64, 118 (1804).
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
Individual Income Tax Return) and Form 1040X (Amended U.S. Individual Income Tax Return); 1545–0123 Form 1120 (U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return); 1545–0132 Form 1120X (Amended U.S. … Individual Income Tax Return); 1545–0123 Form 1120 (U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return); 1545–0132 Form 1120X (Amended April 6, 2009 U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return); 1545–0092 Form 1041 (U.S.
Internal Revenue ServiceCite as 25 I&N Dec. 417 (BIA 2011)
Agency decision · Agency decision
Brand X Internet Servs., 545 U.S. at 980-82. … Brand X Internet Servs., 545 U.S. at 980-82.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewMOTIONS TO STRIKE AND DISMISS DENIED: July 2, 2021
Agency decision · Agency decision
Ikea U.S. East, LLC, 435 F. Supp. 3d 816, 832-33 (S.D. … Koko’s Confectionery & Novelty, 482 F.
Civilian Board of Contract AppealsAgency decision · Agency decision
Commissioner, 119 F.3d 482 (7th Cir. 1997), revg. and remanding 105 T.C. 166 (1995). … Commissioner, 503 U.S.
United States Tax CourtCite as 29 I&N Dec. 118 (BIA 2025)
Agency decision · Agency decision
Cite as 29 I&N Dec. 118 (BIA 2025) Interim Decision #4106 Matter of A-A-F-V-, Respondent Decided by Board June 6, 2025 1 U.S. … record did not establish that harsh prison conditions in El Salvador are specifically intended to torture detained gang members); Matter of R-A-F-, 27 I&N Dec. at 780; Matter of J-R-G-P-, 27 I&N Dec. 482
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933). … Commissioner, 503 U.S. 79, 84 (1992); New Colonial Ice Co. v. Helvering, 292 U.S. 435, 440 (1934).
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Dec. 482 (1946) ; Matter of V B , 3 I. Se N. Dee. 265 (1948). … Barber, 357 U.S. 185 (1958), that this statutory 504 Interim Decision #1055 provision is not applicable in exclusion cases but only in derlortation cases.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewCite as 29 I&N Dec. 514 (BIA 2026)
Agency decision · Agency decision
Cite as 29 I&N Dec. 514 (BIA 2026) Interim Decision #4173 Matter of Terisita MEDINA MADRID, Respondent Decided March 13, 2026 U.S. … See Matter of Ibarra Vega, 29 I&N Dec. at 482 (holding that administrative closure for nearly 13 years exceeds common-sense meanings of a temporary or reasonably short period).
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
USI Film Prods., 511 U.S. 244 (1994); Commissioner v. Soliman, 506 U.S. 168, 174 (1993); Consumer Prod. Safety Commn. v. … C.B. 423, 495. See S.
United States Tax CourtU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Agency decision · Agency decision
U.S. … U.S. Dep’t of the Army, No. Civ. S001748, 2001 WL 34098652, at *3-4 (E.D. Cal. May 4, 2001) (dictum).
Securities and Exchange CommissionAgency decision · Agency decision
Commissioner, 503 U.S. - 9 79, 84 (1992). Petitioner must show that respondent’s determination is in error. Rule 142(a); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933). … Commissioner, 91 T.C. 396, 423-424 (1988), affd. without published opinion 940 F.2d 1534 (9th Cir. 1991); Metra Chem Corp. v. Commissioner, 88 T.C. 654, 662 (1987); Pritchett v.
United States Tax CourtDivision of Investment Management
Agency decision · Agency decision
Analytics Office Registered Fund Statistics Form N-PORT and Form N-CEN Data, period ending March 2026 This is a report of the Staff of the Division of Investment Management’s Analytics Office of the U.S … 1 1 1 1 5 609 39,879 Aug 2025 24,540 1,074 465 479 234 182 223 181 146 101 570 28,195 10,287 400 274 159 142 88 97 88 84 90 304 12,013 562 32 10 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 5 621 40,828 Sep 2025 25,051 1,098 476 482
Securities and Exchange CommissionAgency decision · Agency decision
Gupta v, Walt Disney World Co., 482 F. App'x 458, 459 (11th Cir. 2012); Rozier v. … When you file the Petition with the Boar4, you must serve it on all parties as well as the Chief Administn,tive Law Judge, U.S.
Department of LaborAgency decision · Agency decision
U.S. GAAP U.S. generally-accepted accounting principles. U.S. Group Worldwide Group members that are U.S. persons. U.S. … Such transactions correspond to transactions that under U.S. law are subject to application of Code section 482, as modified by any applicable treaty provision.
Internal Revenue ServiceAgency decision · Agency decision
Memo. 1984-208, revd. on another issue 482 U.S. 117 (1987); Hallmark Cards, Inc. & Subs. v. Commissioner, 90 T.C. 26, 31 (1988). … Commissioner, supra, the U.S.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
under section 482 increasing its U.S. tax liability … The issue is whether the amount of taxpayer's royalty income for the Region A technology and marketing intangibles for Product Z will be increased pursuant to section 482, thereby increasing its U.S. tax
Internal Revenue ServiceAgency decision · Agency decision
Laroche, 723 F.2d 1541 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1245 (1984). 663 Interim Decision #3201 not receive a sentence enhancement for use of a firearm. See Ha. Stat. Ann. § 775.084 (West 1992). … State, 423 So. 2d 593 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982).
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewCite as 29 I&N Dec. 422 (BIA 2026)
Agency decision · Agency decision
City of Bessemer City, 470 U.S. 564, 573–74 (1985))). … Page 423 Cite as 29 I&N Dec. 422 (BIA 2025) Interim Decision #4160 circumstances underlying his conviction for sexual abuse of a child.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933). … DuPont, 308 U.S. 488, 493 (1940); New Colonial Ice Co. v. Helvering, 292 U.S. 435, 440 (1934); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933).
United States Tax Court
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.