Documents

Oral argument — Etheridge v. Jamison

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 16, 2025

And what the committee comments show us is this is really meant for the parties' convenience. But the issue, you're saying, prevails over the Illinois Constitution. … When we go back to the purpose of 205, it's a uniform interstate family support act. That's the whole purpose of this sort of statute.

Oral argument — United States v. Ro

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 26, 2017

of the evidence whether the defendant was a fugitive and tolls that period. … If the convictions were based on all the overt acts of the wire fraud, it would have been harder to prove conspiracy without the overt acts. Isn't that correct?

Oral argument — Fredman v. OSF Healthcare System

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 22, 2020

You have to act diligently, not just at the trial court level in discovering the new evidence, but also once you've learned of it, you have to act diligently in presenting your claim for relief under 2 … That time period, the time period from May 12, 2017 to December 10, 2018 is not counted in the two year period. So, I wanted to make sure I made that point.

Oral argument — Christopher Mendoza v. Nordstrom

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2014

And I think that that's a pretty clean way to look at this. … And the name of the amendment was the 8-Hour Day Restoration and Workplace Flexibility Act. The idea is workplace flexibility.

Oral argument — Hoots v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2022

So she was doing an act that her employer had instructed her to do. … I've seen some of these parking lot cases where there's an didn't clean the lot and there was a therefore an increased risk.

Oral argument — EARP v. STOKES

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 14, 2005

The critical distinction here is between talking about that period and talking about the period after he received his Miranda warnings. … Earp acted the way he did if he was innocent, why he said what he did, didn't say what he did, acted the way he did after the injury. And that could be accounted for by this evidence.

Oral argument — United States v. Francisco Gasca-Ruiz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 12, 2016

I look at what the comment is. And the comment defines what it is. And then it's just a matter of whether, in fact, the injury meets the comment and the law. … The comment doesn't talk about how long. The comment only talks about if the injury is both painful and obvious, it's significant.

Oral argument — United States v. Shelby Petties

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2022

Just like in the air, there's a sort of a separate power to reinstate if it's preserved in an agreement. I believe so, Your Honor. Where does it come from? … And unless, of course, this court acts immediately, Mr. Pettis is inevitably going to serve an above-guideline sentence.

Oral argument — People v. Martin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2011

He thought the men were acting nervous, especially Senegal the driver, so he called for backup. While he was waiting, he inspected Senegal's driver's license and Lionel Martin's passport. … They press all the air out, and then they wrap them very tightly so air and moisture cannot get in. When I order... Yarn? Yarn and fleece... These two guys knitters or something?

Oral argument — Jan Kuklenski v. Medtronic USA, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2024

I think the record shows she did, in fact, travel to Minnesota prior to this 22-month period. … Kuklinski, during the relevant time period of this case, worked in Michigan. She lived in Michigan. She also worked in two other states. She worked in Illinois for a period of time.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Langeberg

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 21, 2020

There was a period of time where he was making contributions, not in the form of monetary contributions, but labor. And that period extends into those tables. … I'm not sure if that's for a period of time before or after.

Oral argument — KELLOGG v. NIKE

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 6, 2011

It had to be acted on by the court. The court granted our motion without any conditions. … This was an effort to streamline the presentation of our case, period.

Oral argument — Decker Coal Company v. Jerry Pehringer

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2021

Well, we cited the law that they are removing bullet air. No, that's an example of how the Secretary of Labor cannot be impeded in removing judicial officers. … And my comment to Mr. Salzman is I can understand what you're saying in the context of workers' compensation, but I can see it.

Oral argument — United States v. Taylor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2007

It's hard to act like they don't count for anything because it's the only reason your client was filing all these petitions, to get the benefit of the stays and to fend off creditors for periods of time … So how is it immaterial if it's the reason your client's acting the way he's acting? Well, the... And he's not fending off his creditors for sport.

Oral argument — IMG v. Westchester

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 17, 2014

And that would be the source of IMG's liability, not some vicarious liability for K-Club's acts. … The last comment by IMG in their argument was that the contribution rights are preserved for a later day.

Oral argument — Chrimar Systems, Inc. v. ALE USA Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 3, 2019

And before the dedication to the public, those two acts took place later. That's correct, Your Honor. … I mean, that was in the air. It could not possibly have not been in the air that those consequences would be.

Oral argument — Andres Dominguez v. City of Scottsdale

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2023

The officer was in the act... It's a fluent act of the officer getting him out of the vehicle and onto the ground so they can get him in handcuffs. At no point did Mr. … He ignored every single comment or every single command by the officer. The officer had absolutely every right to order him out of the car and for him to be out of the car.

Oral argument — Edward Rezek v. City of Tustin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2016

Under 148A, a police officer has to be acting within the legal scope of his or her duties in order for there to be a 148A resisting arrest cause of action. … Invalid because an officer can, because they would not have been acting within the lawful scope of their duties. You're just talking about the resisting arrest.

Oral argument — Phil Thalheimer v. City of San Diego

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2010

That is, we are seeking to retain the status quo that existed previous to the acts complained of, and the acts complained of is the adoption of these laws that restrict the First Amendment activity of … You see, that's my trouble with Randall because it's a typical, careful, balancing, multi-factor, nuanced opinion, which doesn't give us a clean rule for now.

Oral argument — Nightingale v. National Grid USA Service Company Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2024

It does not mean that two unfair acts have to occur. … It does not mean that there has to be an unlawful act, which is the Section 2 violation, then another unlawful act, which is the Section 9 injury.