Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.40s
Federal Register · Rule · Jul 6, 2005
The EPA is approving these revisions to Maryland regulations in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
70 FR 38774Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 15, 2019
Judicial Review and Administrative Reconsideration Under Clean Air Act (CAA) section 307(b)(1), judicial review of this final action is available only by filing a petition for review in the United States … No comments were received during the public comment period and the 180-day period is being finalized as proposed.
84 FR 9590Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 30, 2019
This revision addresses the infrastructure requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) for the 2010 Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). … This action is being taken in accordance with the Clean Air Act. DATES: This rule is effective on May 30, 2019.
84 FR 18142Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Notice · Jan 7, 2022
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background: The CASAC was established pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendments of 1977, codified at 42 U.S.C. 7409(d)(2), to review air quality criteria and NAAQS … Section 109(d)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires that EPA carry out a periodic review and revision, as appropriate, of the air quality criteria and the NAAQS for the six “criteria” air pollutants,
87 FR 958Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Notice · Mar 24, 2023
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background: The CASAC was established pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendments of 1977, codified at 42 U.S.C. 7409(d)(2), to review air quality criteria and NAAQS … Section 109(d)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires that EPA carry out a periodic review and revision, as appropriate, of the air quality criteria and the NAAQS for the six “criteria” air pollutants,
88 FR 17840Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 13, 2010
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
75 FR 18757Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Louisiana; Clean Fuel Fleet Program
Federal Register · Rule · Oct 23, 1995
Background On November 15, 1990, Congress enacted amendments to the 1977 Clean Air Act; Public Law 101-549, 104 Stat. 2399, codified at 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q. … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this action serving as a proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.
60 FR 54305Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Dec 2, 2013
EPA is also determining that New York's obligation to make submissions to meet certain Clean Air Act requirements related to attainment of the NAAQS is not applicable for as long as the New York County … Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by January 31, 2014.
78 FR 72032Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 12, 1995
This proposed rulemaking is intended to take comment on whether a generic RACT submittal, such as Pennsylvania's, meets the requirements of sections 172(c), 182(b)(2), and 182(f) of the Clean Air Act. … Pennsylvania believes that the case-by-case approach is consistent with the RACT requirements of the Clean Air Act.
60 FR 2912Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Dec 14, 2010
This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA). … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
75 FR 77758Environmental Protection AgencySpring 2022 Unified Agenda of Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 8, 2022
Reporting Requirements (AERR) 2060-AV41 10—Clean Air Act—Completed Actions Sequence No. … RIN: 2060-AV41 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA) 10—Clean Air Act Completed Actions 192.
87 FR 48332Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Uncategorized Document · Jan 20, 1994
District Court ruled that the State's interpretation of the Texas SIP was not consistent with the Clean Air Act because the board order would encourage the uncontrolled use of VOC-emitting solvents. … SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D, of the Clean Air Act (CAA) do not create any new requirements, but simply approve requirements that the State is already imposing.
Environmental Protection AgencyProposed Settlement; Acid Rain Allowance Allocations and Reserves Rule Litigation
Federal Register · Notice · Oct 4, 1995
ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement; request for public comment. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air … For a period of thirty (30) days following the date of publication of this notice, the Environmental Protection Agency will receive written comments relating to the settlement from persons who were not
60 FR 52000Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Maine; Regional Haze 5-Year Progress Report
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 19, 2017
Maine's SIP revision addresses requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) and EPA's rules that require States to submit periodic reports describing progress toward reasonable progress goals (RPGs) established … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
82 FR 43699Environmental Protection AgencyTransitional and General Opt Out Procedures for Phase II Reformulated Gasoline Requirements
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 28, 1997
The 1990 Amendments to the Clean Air Act require reformulated gasoline in the nine largest cities with the highest levels of ozone.1 In section 211(k)(6), Congress provided the opportunity for states to … The authority citation for part 80 continues to read as follows: Authority: Section 114, 211 and 301(a) of the Clean Air Act as amended (42 U.S.C. 7414, 7545, and 7601(a)). 2.
62 FR 15077Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Sep 26, 2007
This action is being taken under section 110 of the Federal Clean Air Act (the Act or CAA). … The Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) was published by EPA on May 12, 2005 (70 FR 25162).
72 FR 54556Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 16, 2011
Other Clean Air Act Requirements Applicable to Extreme Ozone Nonattainment Areas V. EPA's Proposed Actions VI. … Air Act.
76 FR 57846Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 1, 2005
Quality Standards (NAAQS) and that all other requirements of the Clean Air Act (the Act) for redesignation to attainment are met. … The Clean Air Act is codified, as amended, in the United States Code at 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
70 FR 38073Environmental Protection AgencyRevisions to the California State Implementation Plan
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · May 9, 2008
We are approving a local rule that regulates these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
73 FR 26355Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 8, 1996
History The Clean Air Act (the Act) requires EPA to develop NESHAP for the pulp and paper source category by November 1997. … Air Act * * *.''
61 FR 9383Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.