Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Henry Ramer and John Westine Jr

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2017

So we have, starting on count 22, so from counts 22 through 29, at a minimum, those cover the same time period as these parallel schemes. If Mr. … I know you accepted this case under the Criminal Justice Act and the court very much would like to thank you for your service.

Oral argument — United States v. Pena

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 12, 2021

So the core elements of this conspiracy remained the same throughout the entirety of the period. … The defense was provided with the grand jury transcripts, sent to the grand jury evidence regarding the entire five-year period.

Oral argument — Fishermen's Finest Inc v. Carlos Gutierrez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2009

Fisheries Act hauler fleet. … But that doesn't tell me you should use a time period when they do something different than they're allowed to do now.

Oral argument — Martin v. Goodrich Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2024

It wipes that slate clean and now makes those all civil claims. That is an absurd result and violates the balancing act that is the workers' compensation statutes. … So they responded to the Fulta decision and they addressed 1F or any repose period.

Oral argument — United States v. Gonzalez-Valdez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2008

This would be air under the, clearly air in the Sixth Circuit under Peters and Thomas, and I think this is consistent with this court's case law, particularly in Cardi. … In fact, it continued the sentencing hearing for a significant period of time in order to allow her to fully develop her sentencing memorandum.

Oral argument — Seven County Coalition v. Eagle County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2024

are involved, so many different environmental checks are in place on land, air, water, pollution. … It's part of the record on which the agency is acting.

Oral argument — Mertes v. Village of Mount Prospect

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 1, 2024

Contrary to what the snarky comment made by the appellate court, that there's nowhere in the statute that TCEBA is a lifetime benefit. … Correct so, and that squares with the no act case. The no act case says the benefits attached on the date that eligibility is determined.

Oral argument — United States v. Taylor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2007

It's hard to act like they don't count for anything because it's the only reason your client was filing all these petitions, to get the benefit of the stays and to fend off creditors for periods of time … So how is it immaterial if it's the reason your client's acting the way he's acting? Well, the... And he's not fending off his creditors for sport.

Oral argument — The Coca-Cola Company and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 25, 2026

And for example, in the Ohio versus EPA case, the Supreme Court decided it invoked arbitrary capricious principles in construing the Clean Air Act. … in considering only tangible assets and excluding consideration of intangible assets is wrong as a matter of law and arbitrary and capricious for that reason alone, and if I could just make one more comment

Oral argument — RNC v. North Carolina State Board of Elections

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2024

race in its findings in the initial section of that act. … That is the provision that they are claiming they are refusing to act under because of this 90-day period and removing people, et cetera.

Oral argument — Assoc. Flight Attn. v. Mesa Air Group, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2009

Your Honor, my name is Joseph Manson, and I'm counsel for Mesa Air Group, the appellant, and I'd like to reserve two minutes for rebuttal, if I may. Okay. … , which are the central provisions of the act in that it requires both parties.

Oral argument — United States v. Fox

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2022

Fox and escorts during the period, though, when the surveillance is in place. … In the government's theory, he should be patronizing escorts throughout this period.

Oral argument — Guardian Flt v. Med Evaluators

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 24, 2025

There's a cooling off period. You can't arbitrate multiple times against the same entity. You can't batch more than a certain number of claims. … They have no connection to Guardian Flight or the other air service. Mr.

Oral argument — Cochran Firm, P.C. v. Cochran Firm Los Angeles LLP

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2015

When the advertising is tend to mislead the public, it is on clean hands. It is on clean hands for a trademark holder to try to reinforce it. It's a court of equity. … In terms of the damages during that period of time in which he was in the L.A. office with Mr.

Oral argument — Juan Machado Amadis v. DOS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 17, 2020

There's no supervising attorney comments or discussion. And, in fact, the recommendation that is redacted, it looks to be a one- or two-word recommendation. … Because it becomes a final agency decision if they act on it.

Oral argument — Phil Thalheimer v. City of San Diego

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2010

That is, we are seeking to retain the status quo that existed previous to the acts complained of, and the acts complained of is the adoption of these laws that restrict the First Amendment activity of … You see, that's my trouble with Randall because it's a typical, careful, balancing, multi-factor, nuanced opinion, which doesn't give us a clean rule for now.

Oral argument — Etheridge v. Jamison

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 16, 2025

And what the committee comments show us is this is really meant for the parties' convenience. But the issue, you're saying, prevails over the Illinois Constitution. … When we go back to the purpose of 205, it's a uniform interstate family support act. That's the whole purpose of this sort of statute.

Oral argument — Fahie v. People of VI

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2016

We want to put this person up and make them as clean as possible. So there'll be an accessory after the fact. … Caddy has said, you pursued a fact FOIA was, uh, acting, uh, uh, on his own at the time the crime was committed.

Oral argument — United States v. Alfred Davis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 1, 2025

And the third issue is whether the court erred in allowing evidence of a prior 404B act, which is the similar act that happened five years prior to the charged conduct. … It's you have the right to use the property for some determined period, a year or two years as you had in this case.

Oral argument — United States v. Sixto Padilla-Gomez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 12, 2013

discovery in the context of standard Discovery not expert discovery so our position is the dog handler or the dog is not an expert didn't require expert disclosure and the only issue really is did the judge air … testimony that Smelling marijuana or smelling deodorizers or that are that are consistent, but some of it wasn't written in a report It just came up at the time of the hearing I believe the I believe the the comment