Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.22s
Reply Brief — Rosner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1978
FCC. 513 Sei a (9th Cir.) cert. denied, 423 U.S. 836 (1975); United States —— Systems, Inc., 48 FCC 2d 859 (1974); aff'd, AT&T v. FCC, 539 F.2d 767 (D.C. … 503 F.2d 1250 (3d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1026 eh. denied, 423 U.S. 886 (1975); Specialized Common Carriers 44 FCC 2d 467 (1973) 50 FCC 24 416 (1974). *° Slip op. at 26; Pet. App. 26a.
434 U.S. 1015Respondents Brief — General Communications, Inc. v. Iowa Utilities Board
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2002
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 468 U.S. 137 See een. eC 18 United States v. Wells, 519 U.S. 482 (1997) .............ccccceee 15 Wisconsin v. FPC, 303 F.2d 380 (D.C. … Wells, 519 U.S. 482, 490 (1997) (natu- ral reading of the full text is the “first criterion in the interpretive hierarchy” for statutes); Connecticut Nat’l Bank v.
537 U.S. 807Opposition — DeAngelo v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1979
Skipwith, 482 F. 2d 1272, 1275-1276 (Sth Cir. 1973). … Skipwith, supra, 482 F. 2d at 1276- 1277,!
440 U.S. 935Reply Brief — Kansas v. Colorado
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2009
New York, 523 U.S. 767 (1998)........... 4 Texas v. New Mexico, 462 U.S. 554 (1983) ............. 4 Texas v. New Mexico, 482 U.S. 124 (1987) ...... 3, 4, 5, 6 West Virginia ex rel. Dyer v. … New Mexico, 482 U.S. 124 (1987). There, the Court held that the Court would pro- vide a remedy for past breaches of compact obligations. Id., at 128.
556 U.S. 98Federal Register · Uncategorized Document · Mar 3, 1994
Telephone: 202-482-1835; Fax: 202-482-0979; E-mail: niintia. doc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Current members of the Advisory Council on the National Information Infrastructure include: Mr. … . or from the U.S.
Federal Register · Notice · May 14, 2026
SUMMARY: The U.S. … FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura Delgado at (202) 482-1468 (China), Matthew Palmer at (202) 482-1678 (Korea), Jacob Waddell at (202) 482-1369 (Taiwan), and Rebecca Janz at (202) 482-2972 (Vietnam
91 FR 27266Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationSupreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
Hewitt, 482 U.S. at 761. … Hewitt, 482 U.S. at 763.
532 U.S. 598Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Glynn T. Murphy, Petitioner v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 9, 2018
United States, 570 U.S. 99, –, 133 S. … See Alleyne, 570 U.S. at –, 133 S.
Opposition Brief — Caulfield v. Commissioner
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1995
United States, 244 F.2d 423 (8th Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 838 (1967) ...........0...cccccccosccosscesess Commissioner v. … United States, 348 U.S. 121, 132 (1954); Blackwell v. United States, 244 F.2d 423, 427 (8th Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 838 (1957); Schwartzkopf v.
514 U.S. 1016Federal Register · Notice · Oct 15, 2004
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cindy Robinson at (202) 482-3797, or Amber Musser at (202) 482-1777 (PRC), and David J. … Goldberger at (202) 482-4136, or Kate Johnson at (202) 482-4929 (India), Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S.
69 FR 61202Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationMeeting of the Civil Nuclear Trade Advisory Committee
Federal Register · Notice · Jul 16, 2019
(Phone: 202-482-0775; Fax: 202-482-5665; email: devin.horne@trade.gov ). … App.), in response to an identified need for consensus advice from U.S. industry to the U.S.
84 FR 33921Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationAmicus Curiae Brief — Kansas v. Nebraska and Colorado (No. 220126-ORG)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
New Merico, 482 U.S. at 132. … New Mexico, 482 U.S. at 128.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 22, 2021
Hendrix, 423 F.3d 1247, 1252 (11th Cir. 2005). … Bennett, 423 F.3d at 1252.
Respondents Brief — Flood v. Kuhn
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1972
Griffiths, 318 U.S. 371 (1943)... a ae Telvering . Hallock, 309 U.S. 106 (1940) 42. … Hallock, 309 U.S. 106,110. And . .
407 U.S. 258Petition for Writ of Certiorari — LaMarcus Thomas, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 23, 2019
United States, 371 U.S. 471, 481-482 (1963)); Johnson v. … Banks, 482 F.3d 733, 738 (4th Cir. 2007)(quoting Maryland v. Dyson, 527 U.S. 465, 466 (1999).
Opposition — Hoffman v. Minnesota Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1983
Seldin, 420 U.S. 490 (1975) ............ Weinstein v. Bradford, 423 U.S. 147 (1975) ........ Constitutional Provisions: U.S. Const. Art. … Brad- ford, 423 U.S. 147 (1975). Midland-Guardian of Pensaco- la, Inc. v. Carr, 425 F.2d 793 (Sth Cir. 1970).
463 U.S. 1207Amicus Brief — Ferri v. Ackerman
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1979
Pachtman, supra, 424 U.S. at 422-423. … Pachtman, supra, 424 U.S. at 422-423.
444 U.S. 193Initiation of Five-Year (“Sunset”) Reviews
Federal Register · Notice · Oct 2, 2006
For information from the Commission contact Mary Messer, Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission at (202) 205-3193. … A-475-818 731-TA-734 Italy Certain Pasta (2nd Review) Brandon Farlander (202) 482-0182.
71 FR 57921Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationAmicus Curiae Brief — Brown v. Legal Foundation of Wash.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
County of Los Angeles, 482 U.S. 304 (1987) ......ccccecscesereeesreeeereeesereseneneeees passim Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. … First English, 482 U.S. at 321 (citing Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon, 260 US. 393, 416 (1922).
538 U.S. 216Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1976
Texas, 386 U.S. 707, 18 L.Ed.2d 423, , acc earennees oeees 34 Commonwealth v. Barclay, 240 A.2d 839 (Pa. App. 111 32 Coughlan v. United States, 391 F.2d 371 (9 Cir. … Texas, 386 U.S. 707, 18 L.Ed.2d 423, 87 S.Ct. 1338 (1967); Greenwald v. Wisconsin, 390 U.S. 519, 20 L.Ed.2d 77, 88 S.Ct. 1152 (1968); Darwin v.
425 U.S. 950
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.