Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.52s
Prologue — Pelullo v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 2006
Roe, 389 F.3d 908 (CA9 2004)... cece 12, 24 Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972)......... 3, 5, 24, 26 Hughes v. … App. la-44a) is pub- lished at 399 F.3d 197. The district court’s judgment and opinion (Pet. App. 45a-87a) are unpublished.
546 U.S. 1137Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jean Dominique Morancy, Petitioner v. Sabrina Alex Salomon
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 12, 2026
Znosko, 399 So.3d 1270 (Fla. 4th DCA Nov. 14, 2024) • Morancy v. Department of Revenue Circuit 17, Broward Unit DOR, (4D2025-0239) • Morancy v. Salomon, No. 6D2023-2155 (March 22, 2023) • Morancy v. … Salomon et al, No. 24-12505 (11th Cir. May 8, 2025) (App. C page 4a11a).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Bongiovanni v. San Filippo
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1995
Lacke, 885 F.2d 399 (7th Cir. 1989) cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1029 (1990)..................06- 12 Langley v. Adams County, 987 F.2d 1473 (10th Cir. … at 822-24. Here as in Tuttle, there is no express policy that mandates retaliation against persons who exercise First Amendment rights.
513 U.S. 1082Record and brief — Henry Carpenter, Plaintiff in Error, vs. James Dexter, Executor of John B. James
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1868
Linn, 19 Ill. 399. Tuly v. Davis, 30 Ill. 103. Wiley v. Lean, 1 Gil. 303. … Linn, 19 Ill. 399, 401. Job v. Tebbetts, 4 Gil. 143. Tully v. Davis, 30 Ill. 108.
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980
Louchheim, 296 N.E. 314, 250 S.E.2d 630 (1979)...... 29 52,53 21,22,23, 24,25,26, 39 52 29 32 29,30, 31,32 24 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES (CONT. ) State v. … Miller at 359, 399).
449 U.S. 984Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Long v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2003
No. 399, 68 Stat. 250, codified at 25 U.S.C. §§ 891-902 (1953). … No. 399, 68 Stat. 250 (1954)).
540 U.S. 822Agency decision · Agency decision
Betsy charged the $399 cost of this ticket on her Markette American Express credit card. … Accordingly, that $399 is not properly an expense of the Miami trips paid for by check Nos.
United States Tax CourtBrief for Appellee — Buckley v. Valeo
Supreme Court brief · Brief for Appellee · 1976
Mitchell, 400 U.S. 112__-- ~~~. 19, 24 Phoenix v. Kolodziejski, 399 U.S. 204__ _____ 23 Cases—Continued pene Pipefitters v. United States, 407 U.S. 385____ 20-21 Pittsburgh Press Co. v. … Hartke, 405 U.S. 15, 24-25.
424 U.S. 1Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 30, 2024
Id. at 399. … Adkins, 310 U.S. 381, 399 (1940).
Petitioners Brief — Nebrasks v. Parker, 136 S. Ct. 27 (2015) (No. 14-1406)
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 2015
J.A. 1122- 24. … J.A. 1122-24.
Petitioners Brief — Water Splash, Inc. v. Menon, 137 S. Ct. 1240 (2017) (No. 16-254)
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 2017
Co., Inc., 722 8.W.2d 399, 401 (Tex. 1986). * Tex. R. Civ. … J.A. 1; C.R. 303-24.
Petitioners Brief — Evangelisto Ramos, Petitioner v. Louisiana
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · Jun 11, 2019
United States, 570 U.S. 99 (2015) .......................................... 24, 46 Am. Publ’g Co. v. Fisher, 166 U.S. 464 (1897) .................................. 19, 24, 25 Andres v. … Louisiana, 508 U.S. 275 (1993) ..............................................24 Taylor v. Louisiana, 419 U.S. 522 (1975) ..............................................24 Thompson v.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jacqueline Bustamante, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 27, 2018
Brown, 232 F.3d 399 (4th Cir. 2000); United States v. Feichtinger, 105 F.3d 1188 (7th Cir. 1997); United States v. Bolinger, 940 F.2d 478 (9th Cir. 1991). … See, Paragraph 24, Plea Agreement, App., infra, __a.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — O'Carroll v. Chaparral Airlines, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1989
(Pub.L. 85-726, Title I, § 105, as added Pub. 95-504, § 4(a), Oct. 24, 1978, 92 Stat. 1708. and amended Pub.L. 98-443, $9(u), Oct. 4. 1984. 98 Stat. 1709.) … Ct. 399, 404, 85 L.Ed. 581, 587 (1941). The existence of any of these circumstances is sufficient to establish preemption. See Michigan Canners & Freezers Assn v.
490 U.S. 1106Jurisdictional Statement — Harris v. Fuerst
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1981
OPINION BELOW The opinion of the Supreme Court of Ohio, attached hereto, in reported at 64 Ohio St. 2d 128, 413 N.E. 24 826 (1980). … Miller, 61 Ohio St. 24 6, 399 N.E. 2d 66 (1980). THE FEDERAL QUESTION IS SUBSTANTIAL The right to access to the divorce courts has been recognized as fundamental by this Court in Boddie v.
451 U.S. 965Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 27, 2021
Counsel for amici provided notice to all parties in Cases 21A244 and 21A247 on December 24. … Parrish, 300 U.S. 379, 398–399 (1935).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Kelley v. Florida (No. 86-106)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1986
Green, supra, 399 U.S. at 158. … State, 441 So.24 606 (Fie. 1983); State v. Barber, 301 So.24 7 (Pla. 1974).
Appendix — Whitmore v. Board of Education of DeKalb Community School District No. 428
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1994
Stat. ch. 122, par. 24-11 (1989). … Stat., ch. 122, par. 24-11 (1989).
510 U.S. 1113Petition — Rodriguez v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1977
gg CY RR eee yy Hie 24 nene bieus saekin See 24 United States v. Cox, 536 F.2d 65 (5th Cir. 1976) .... 24 United States v. Davis, 357 F.2d 438 (5th Cir, 1966) 20 United States v. … denied, 399 U.S. 933 (1970) .................. 13, 15 United States v. Kenner, 354 F.2d 780 (2d Cir. 1965) 14 United States v. Knight, 535 F.2d 1059 (8th Cir. 1976) 24 United States v.
434 U.S. 819Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
United States, 567 U.S. 387, 399 (2012). Second, “state laws are preempted when they conflict with federal law.” /d at 2501. … /d. at 399 (quoting U.S. Const. art. VJ, cl. 2). 2.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.