Documents

Oral argument — Michael Preston v. American Honda Motor Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2019

, so the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act It's it's a unique act because it was created to be more expansive than common law fraud It was created to be a remedial act and give consumers rights against deceptive … Thank you We believe that the district court aired When it when it found that we did not give the defendant proper notice or fair notice of the grounds of the claim Under rule 9b parties must state when

Oral argument — Ivan Iontchev v. AAA Cab Service, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 17, 2017

He's a cab, gasoline, crelts, cleaning products, that sort of thing, but that's a pretty significant fact, isn't it? … But doesn't the driver have the economic incentive from the person owning it to pick up his pay fares and make as much money in a shorter period of time?

Oral argument — Wi-LAN, Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2014

That's merely telling you where, what acts of infringement or what acts by Erickson would or would not trigger this limitation on damages. … We don't take the position that it covers every LME product, period.

Oral argument — Wi-LAN USA, Inc. v. Ericsson, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2014

That's merely telling you where, what acts of infringement or what acts by Do you have any argument outside of Article 4 for contending that these patents were not subject to the most favored licensing … If it's true that the covenant not to sue covers every LME product period, then why do we have Section 4 and Section 7 at all? We don't take the position that it covers every LME product period.

Oral argument — Joyce McKiver v. Murphy-Brown, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 31, 2020

In other words, they're just these open air lagoons that weren't covered. … That act clarified that under North Carolina law, the measure of damage is loss of property value, not discomfort. But the Right to Farm Act doesn't apply here. You would agree with that, would you?

Oral argument — Jefferson County v. Express Scripts, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 16, 2025

Is this, help me here, are you making like an equitable tolling argument, that your time period to remove is told during this period of time, that the, that you've been told that the county is not relying … But I think that would be a very dangerous holding because that would essentially turn the textually specified 30-day period into a 24-hour period.

Oral argument — Whitaker v. Wedbush Securities, Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 28, 2019

So in the drafting of it, they made a deliberate decision to write on a clean slate and to treat the funds transfer as a unique method of payment to be governed under unique rules that address the particular … Just a couple of comments. While you're looking for your comments, I have a question.

Oral argument — Bridges v. Methodist Hospital

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2022

There was a period of time from when they were terminated up until the drug became approved in August of 2021. … And the court absolutely could keep this as narrow and clean as that. Okay. Anything else you want to tell us? No. If the court has no further questions, I think I've said everything I need to say.

Oral argument — Packgen v. Berry Plastics Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2016

In addition for CRI, he assumes a 10-year period. He assumes it's going to be the same number of sales for the 10-year period. … The rule contemplates that intent is always going to be an act in the future. So those things can't be contemporaneous. The act is always coming later.

Oral argument — JOSEPH T. GARGIULO v. DHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2013

And so the remedy would be back pay for the three months between the two periods? Yeah, the remedy here would be back pay. … But a meaningful reply surely means something other than a reply to the janitor who cleans the building, right?

Oral argument — Miller v. Ullom

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 16, 2016

Or are you required to have some intentional act on the part of the investigator to blame your clients? … I want to clarify that comment about 99% under her own free will.

Oral argument — In the Matter of Estate of Eagle

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 30, 2018

But the court recognized the efforts of the administrator to move forward and to clean up the house, to sell the personal property, and to sell the residence. … That still could have been accomplished within the two-year period required by statute. The Dow shares did not eschew to the state of Delaware.

Oral argument — Patrick Baehr v. Creig Northrop Team, P.C.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2020

You can't go and clean up a client's testimony. Well, the client was confused. … But more than that, it was one comment that said, in response to a question, no, my lawyer said, I don't have to do this.

Oral argument — United States v. 191.07 Acres of Land

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2006

Or Dow would have held – Dow discussed the Tucker Act and said that inverse condemnation lies only in the court of claims pursuant to the Tucker Act. … Because KOK was a pure inverse condemnation action brought pursuant to the Mining and the Parks Act, did not address the Declaration of Takings Act, did not address condemnation with Declaration of Takings

Oral argument — Pickens v. Barnhart

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2007

This is not like Aloha Air, where a witness is making assertions about things where she doesn't possibly have the personal knowledge about them. … Pickens must establish that she's disabled under the Rehabilitation Act. And it's not enough for her to show that she has a medical condition or an impairment.

Oral argument — Capital Finance, LLC v. Oscar Rosenberg

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2020

There wasn't much talk of the evidence of intent here, but the suggestion that the court aired by concluding that Mr. … And then regarding, you know, counsel commented about how to infer intent based upon, again, Mr. Newman's sophistication.

Oral argument — United States v. Lonny Ennen

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2011

Because of my comments to my smate, I'd also add that Trooper Cook didn't ask can I come in. He didn't say thanks for letting me come on in. You can hear him barging into that. … There was humidity in the air. There was something that suggested that there was something living there that was marijuana rather than something that had been smoked. That is correct.

Oral argument — Shellenberger v. AIG WarrantyGuard, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2026

Is there a Consumer Protection Act claim in this case? Yes, of course, there's a Consumer Protection Act claim in this case. … It was September 2022 to February 2023, where she's cleaning out the black set in her. Thank you. Yeah, I appreciate that clarification. And you go. I don't know why.

Oral argument — Tifow v. Holder

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 17, 2008

If you look at the critical facts here, that in a five-week period, Mr. … And then she goes back and three days later says, you know, the guy's just full of hot air. And that seems very strange.

Oral argument — Global Equity Management (SA) v. Ebay Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2019

I just printed a clean one out for you. Okay. So the question is what conduct of Amazon with regard to the IPRs, not with regard to Texas or Virginia? Okay. … Period. This is our first opportunity to brief this new case law. Period. We did not have a chance to do it below, and we should have had on this record. Well, that's talking about the merits.