Documents

Oral argument — People v. Hale

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 16, 2025

So the jury's thinking was This defendant acted intentionally in count two And he acted intentionally in the vehicular homicide count There is no evidence whatsoever That they even consider that he acted … And The Reason For That Is That If You Did It Would Be No Cumulative Air Review Ever.

Oral argument — United States v. Jay Briley

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2014

that those acts are just assaultive and all those the conduct from those two clauses is assaultive and conversely if it's encompasses all the acts and both of those clauses encompass all of those acts … now it wasn't plain the misdemeanor prong was the subject of a circuit split no circuit had interpreted the felony you need to get this resolved as a matter of law here you can count one I think plain air

Oral argument — United States v. Joshua Perez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2019

And with respect to your comment about his treatment in the ER, that's not hospitalization, surgery, or physical rehabilitation. … First, the standard review is plain-air. Jones v. United States makes that abundantly clear.

Oral argument — Przybycien v. Liu

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2012

I don't think it's a useless act. I think it's an act that's required under the law to preserve the appeal, and that was not done in this case. … And also, when the plaintiff does testify that he was propelled forward with his hand going up in the air, when Dr.

Oral argument — Global Equity Management (SA) v. Ebay Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2019

I just printed a clean one out for you. Okay. So the question is what conduct of Amazon with regard to the IPRs, not with regard to Texas or Virginia? Okay. … Period. This is our first opportunity to brief this new case law. Period. We did not have a chance to do it below, and we should have had on this record. Well, that's talking about the merits.

Oral argument — Jan Kuklenski v. Medtronic USA, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2024

I think the record shows she did, in fact, travel to Minnesota prior to this 22-month period. … Kuklinski, during the relevant time period of this case, worked in Michigan. She lived in Michigan. She also worked in two other states. She worked in Illinois for a period of time.

Oral argument — People v. Baez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 14, 2010

The capital litigation act was effective. … So Judge Lampkin was acting under color of this court's rules. She was acting under color of the state statutes.

Oral argument — Bart Kimber v. Ray Mabus

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2015

Because the Navy's failure to act in accordance with these regulations, number one, and the Navy's failure to act totally contrary to these regulations, those two things operated over a period of literally … So the employing agency is involved over an extended period of time, and that's what our complaint is about. It's about their involvement over an extended period of time.

Oral argument — Kristy Douglas v. Xerox Business Services

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2017

We say, look, that shouldn't matter under the Fair Labor Standards Act. … If you're sitting at your desk, it is seven hours I'm on the phone continuously, the last hour I'm spending cleaning up my desk, and it's all nonproductive time.

Oral argument — United States v. Gradinariu

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2008

But, again, you don't just pick a number out of thin air. Another time he says 18 years is fine with me because I know I screwed up. Again, this 18 years is weighing on him. … I'd like to comment that I think you both argued this case very well, and it's a pleasure to have good lawyers like you before the court. So thank you both for your argument. I agree. I second that.

Oral argument — United States v. William Murphy

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2011

So we would be for plain air, correct? You do. You do. … One is the authoritative tone or manner in which the officers approach and act. Second, the number of officers. Third, whether weapons are displayed.

Oral argument — United States v. Lawrence Halamek

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 14, 2021

And so really similar to Harris, there was a short period of time. And also, the victim in Harris lived with the defendant and called him Dad. … So the court did not air much less plainly. So in finding that that care custody enhancement applied.

Oral argument — 04-17558 Maria Pintos v. Pacific Creditors

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2007

I think that is the case under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. And if you look at the Fair Credit Reporting Act in total, Mr. … I have a few comments to clean up. Mr. McClune challenged this on the record as the reasons for pulling the credit report of Ms. Pintos at the excerpts of records submitted by Pacific Creditors.

Oral argument — Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 5, 2019

, that when your insulin is acidic, there's a higher tendency to have aggregation, and when your insulin is more monomeric, then you're also going to be having a higher It's in a glass vial with some air … Lantus was originally on the market in a formulation without a surfactant for some period of time. And that label acts as prior art here.

Oral argument — United States v. Jesus Covarruvias-Villareal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 16, 2023

It had a plea waiver, I mean, an appellate waiver and a clause on air waiver or issue waiver, correct? Correct, Your Honor. So, why are you even here? Your Honor, this is a very good question. … It only mentions criminal history, so it can't be the case that those comments caused the court to rely on entirely different reasons to deny the variance.

Oral argument — Seven County Coalition v. Eagle County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2024

are involved, so many different environmental checks are in place on land, air, water, pollution. … It's part of the record on which the agency is acting.

Oral argument — Mertes v. Village of Mount Prospect

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 1, 2024

Contrary to what the snarky comment made by the appellate court, that there's nowhere in the statute that TCEBA is a lifetime benefit. … Correct so, and that squares with the no act case. The no act case says the benefits attached on the date that eligibility is determined.

Oral argument — Kaur v. Gonzales

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 14, 2006

We're trying so hard to clean up our act. And I don't remember who the judge was in this case, but it's unlikely. And I think we could certainly request it. But remand isn't required here. … If you have one more comment, we will interrupt you.

Oral argument — A.P. Bell Fish Company, Inc. v. Gina Raimondo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 27, 2023

In other words, both are allocating red grouper based on historical landings in the same period, 1986 to 2005. … So by puncturing the air bladder, they can be dropped back down to the ocean floor and released. Sent to beds. Exactly. Right. And they survive after their air bladder is punctured?

Oral argument — City of Miami Gardens v. Wells Fargo & Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 14, 2019

And by claims, you mean actual violations within the discriminatory practices that violate the Act. That violate the Act. So you have to have a freestanding... … They have to show an action of a violation of the Fair Housing Act within the period of the statute of limitations. That's what any plaintiff's burden is in coming into a court.