Documents

Oral argument — Menken v. Emm

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2007

If she has, I'll comment more in my rebuttal, unless the Court has questions. I'll move to the merits of the case. … Yes, and the specific Federal law of reference is the Uniform Enforcement of Judgment Act.

Oral argument — United States v. King

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2026

So we know that there's a 48-hour period that contains the relevant evidence. … The third party Techs Now also did not act as a government agent. The government only made the request to the third party Techs Now to preserve the data.

Oral argument — Montgomery v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 17, 2021

I'm not saying that laboratory testing is irrelevant, but when you say laboratory testing, you don't mean to clean up and use the product for its intended purpose. … We don't amend complaints in this period. We sometimes grant leave to amend, but we don't amend complaints. Go back. They were denied the chance to argue.

Oral argument — People v. Ferrell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2022

That is part of their own clean hands argument. I'll address it now. … You can't run for township office if you're a convicted felon, period. And I would say my argument has two prongs on the unconstitutionality.

Oral argument — Patrick Baehr v. Creig Northrop Team, P.C.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2020

You can't go and clean up a client's testimony. Well, the client was confused. … But more than that, it was one comment that said, in response to a question, no, my lawyer said, I don't have to do this.

Oral argument — People v. Hale

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 16, 2025

So the jury's thinking was This defendant acted intentionally in count two And he acted intentionally in the vehicular homicide count There is no evidence whatsoever That they even consider that he acted … And The Reason For That Is That If You Did It Would Be No Cumulative Air Review Ever.

Oral argument — United States v. GOSSMAN

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2005

And in each one of these, the very first sentence says, You have accepted responsibility to act on behalf of Rose Dreischfeld. … This comment was made in the context of a direct response to that.

Oral argument — United States v. Jay Briley

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2014

that those acts are just assaultive and all those the conduct from those two clauses is assaultive and conversely if it's encompasses all the acts and both of those clauses encompass all of those acts … now it wasn't plain the misdemeanor prong was the subject of a circuit split no circuit had interpreted the felony you need to get this resolved as a matter of law here you can count one I think plain air

Oral argument — Feds for Medical Freedom v. Biden

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2022

Um, some of the other cases, AFGE versus Trump and AFGE versus Air Force, um, are, um, especially helpful. … It's definitely moved away from them in the AFTE versus Trump case and the AFTE versus Air Force case.

Oral argument — Sentry Ins. a Mutual v. American National

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2008

And it looked at it for a period of time and then decided that it did not owe a defense or coverage? That's correct. It had actually an initially assigned counsel. … The MFM machine could not have ever caused this fire because it had an air chuck and air would not have... Where do we get coverage for failure to warn?

Oral argument — Jack Brown v. Kevin Smith

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2015

But if you added it up, the number of trips he took, I think he took 63 trips over a 10-month period. He worked for, you know, 180 days going all over the country pulling these campers. … But, again, first of all, that's reviewed for clear air. And second of all, I think the evidence supported the notion that this was a good shot.

Oral argument — United States v. Joshua Perez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2019

And with respect to your comment about his treatment in the ER, that's not hospitalization, surgery, or physical rehabilitation. … First, the standard review is plain-air. Jones v. United States makes that abundantly clear.

Oral argument — Przybycien v. Liu

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2012

I don't think it's a useless act. I think it's an act that's required under the law to preserve the appeal, and that was not done in this case. … And also, when the plaintiff does testify that he was propelled forward with his hand going up in the air, when Dr.

Oral argument — George v. Commissioner of IRS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2016

We would have a very different case if IRS had assessed back taxes and penalties for the period after the organizational papers are filed, but that's not this case. … And it was an organization, although no one would ever get much credit if they didn't clean it up and file the paperwork. There's no doubt.

Oral argument — Francisco Reyes-Corado v. Merrick Garland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 20, 2023

I just want to make a clean record. So where's the third one? I'm also looking at a Valentine's Day threat in 2009, February 14, 2009, which was directed at his mother and sister. … Why isn't there a pattern of threats here, extending a far longer period of time than what was before the immigration judge, and the motivation is different?

Oral argument — Peter Thomas v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2013

It's the same state act that expunges a conviction. … Because that statute said the BIA can detain an alien beyond the deportation period.

Oral argument — United States v. Steven Traylor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2020

Those that I just recounted, the government basically cites to the transcript things that he acted, constantly acted nervously. He was difficult to understand. He paced around. … I do want to make, before my time runs up, one comment about the reply brief.

Oral argument — Global Equity Management (SA) v. Ebay Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2019

I just printed a clean one out for you. Okay. So the question is what conduct of Amazon with regard to the IPRs, not with regard to Texas or Virginia? Okay. … Period. This is our first opportunity to brief this new case law. Period. We did not have a chance to do it below, and we should have had on this record. Well, that's talking about the merits.

Oral argument — United States v. Smith

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 16, 2018

There, at least the victim had an opportunity to view the gun for a longer period of time rather than a mere instant. He was familiar with the individual. … These comments by the defendant, how did the judge feel that that supported the determination, this is a firearm?

Oral argument — Jan Kuklenski v. Medtronic USA, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2024

I think the record shows she did, in fact, travel to Minnesota prior to this 22-month period. … Kuklinski, during the relevant time period of this case, worked in Michigan. She lived in Michigan. She also worked in two other states. She worked in Illinois for a period of time.