Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
5.16s
Oral argument — Hamilton v. Dallas County
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2021
It wasn't just that the sergeant said, well, it's sex-based, period. That's right, Your Honor. The sergeant said that it was based on sex and the sergeant also makes this comment about safety. … Keep in mind, you know, there's an old football adage, you don't put the ball in the air when you're leading. Thank you for that reminder, Your Honor.
53 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Stonehill, etc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 18, 2011
Hagestad found some fortunate person in the FOIA release thing who said, oh, I can get you a clean copy, and she did, and it revealed what I just told you. … And one of the reasons they never got it is because the government acted like, well, we don't have any control over the NBI.
42 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Juan Rodriguez-Sifuentes
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 6, 2016
incorporated those comments. … Again, there was no public airing of the materiality and the contours of the witnesses' testimony.
26 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · May 20, 2020
If that is done, I think, and then of course, within, to give me at least 120 days to make sure I get a lawyer or law firm that are loyal enough to help me clean up all this mess. … Ceballos might want to use that three-week period that he gave him to find counsel that he could speak with and that they could choose an appropriate remedy from there.
23 min of audioOral argument — Levine v. City of Alameda
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 16, 2008
That was the allegedly offending act. Is that correct? I believe that was the allegedly offending act in Little. … That is a question that the district court left up in the air.
51 min of audioOral argument — Inclusive Louisiana v. St. James Parish
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2024
But, even if we have a discrete act claim, even if this were cast as a discrete act, this case would still be timely because we have discriminatory acts within the limitations period, and that's the 2022 … DeVilliers, will address assignments one and two that deal with the prescriptive period issues.
49 min of audioOral argument — Kamel ChaneySnell v. Andrew Young
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 25, 2023
his hands in the air, his hands are in the air, they hit him once. … Yeah, so a very short period. They can't just drag anyone. So then there is no de minimis exception.
49 min of audioOral argument — Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 5, 2019
, that when your insulin is acidic, there's a higher tendency to have aggregation, and when your insulin is more monomeric, then you're also going to be having a higher It's in a glass vial with some air … Lantus was originally on the market in a formulation without a surfactant for some period of time. And that label acts as prior art here.
40 min of audioOral argument — Kristy Douglas v. Xerox Business Services
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2017
We say, look, that shouldn't matter under the Fair Labor Standards Act. … If you're sitting at your desk, it is seven hours I'm on the phone continuously, the last hour I'm spending cleaning up my desk, and it's all nonproductive time.
42 min of audioOral argument — Restaurant Law Center v. LABR
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2022
What are the, is there a meaningful difference between the rule today, which is a notice and comment rule, right? … Am I taking the tip credit or am I not taking the tip credit for that period of time?
44 min of audioOral argument — Bolanos-Reynoso v. Department of Agriculture
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2025
Belanos-Reynoso alleged that she made protected disclosures based on violation of laws and regulations, the Anti-Deficiency Act specifically, and also USDA regulations. … Belanos-Reynoso's deficient performance during the performance improvement plan period, that 60-day period.
34 min of audioOral argument — Nickolas McMahon v. Nancy Berryhill
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 13, 2018
Berryhill, the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. The claimant does not meet this listing 104. It's his burden to prove that he met every element of the listing. … Shea, who found just these long periods of complete — Because of the epidural injections? Yes. Well, that's treatment — that's another thing that listing 104 requires.
21 min of audioOral argument — In Re: Seven Oaks Partners, LP
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 23, 2019
The finances of the Licatas were somewhat strained throughout that entire period. So, would it be unusual for you or I to move six times in that period? Probably. Well, me anyway. … The case was held up for some period of time, but not by the fact that Mrs. Licata's claim was still up in the air.
20 min of audioOral argument — Jane Doe v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Board of Education
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2024
And that's where the Hurley case really is a very clean way to resolve this issue. … You've got November 3rd of 2015 allegations and the time period following, Hurley doesn't come out until 2018.
41 min of audioOral argument — Unite Here! Local 5 v. NLRB
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 15, 2019
I don't know local law whether that would be considered a potentially criminal act, but there's that instance. … And a strike fundamentally changes the calculus with respect to Section 7 of the Act and, therefore, with respect to Section 8B1A.
12 min of audioOral argument — Alan Dershowitz v. Cable News Network, Inc
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2024
, not this act. … Because as we've said, all of this has been fully aired at this point and at least these people say that's still what they think.
46 min of audioOral argument — Clarence Davis v. Capital One N.A.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 19, 2025
Davis received illegal calls from Capital One which violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and he has a judgment against Capital One for those violations. Mr. … So a subpoena to the carrier for records before that period of time would indicate the dates of disconnect. It's not as clean because the R&D is simple.
41 min of audioOral argument — Dennis Turney v. Hyundai Construction Equipment
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2012
Specifically, there was in the record a series of three comments by Mr. Lim, who was the president of HCE, and the comments bracketed the adverse personnel action. So when he met Mr. Turney, Mr. … No, period. I mean, I could spend ten minutes and six seconds standing here and saying, well, how old are you, and you don't look that old, what does that import?
27 min of audioOral argument — Singh v. Cigna Corp
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2018
caused by Cigna's acquisition of the HealthSpring corporation which closed in January of 2012 HealthSpring was a had never been sanctioned by CMS even once so unlike Cigna HealthSpring had an absolutely clean … perhaps you could just address a question about maybe I'm confused about discovery in this case when this motion was pending can you just describe the procedural setting in which this in which the court acted
39 min of audioOral argument — Charles Holloway v. State of Maryland
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 21, 2021
However, in amending the complaint, I think it could be cleaned up to sort of differentiate the things at issue. … Because it's not, I mean, the meeting itself isn't something that would be characterized as an act of retaliation.
43 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.