Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.37s
Federal Register · Rule · Mar 10, 2016
The EPA is approving these revisions pursuant to section 110 and section 507(a) of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … We will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. We will not institute a second comment period on this action.
81 FR 12595Environmental Protection AgencyAcid Rain Program; Elimination of Direct Sale Program and IPP Written Guarantee Program: Final Rule
Federal Register · Rule · Jun 6, 1996
. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: Title IV of the Clean Air Act, as amended by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, (the Act) authorized the U.S. … The rule revision is being issued as a direct final rule because the Act mandates this action and no adverse comment is expected.
61 FR 28761Environmental Protection AgencyProtection of Stratospheric Ozone: Determination 28 for Significant New Alternatives Policy Program
Federal Register · Rule · May 17, 2013
The statements in the “Further Information” column in the table provide additional information but are not legally binding under section 612 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … Statutory Requirements and Authority for the SNAP Program Section 612 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires EPA to develop a program for evaluating alternatives to ozone-depleting substances (ODSs).
78 FR 29034Environmental Protection AgencyHours of Service of Drivers; Definition of Agricultural Commodity
Federal Register · Rule · Nov 24, 2020
FMCSA will consider all comments and material received during the comment period and may change this IFR based on your comments. … Air Act was an interpretative not a legislative rule; notice and comment not required), quoting Pesikoff v.
85 FR 74909Transportation DepartmentFederal Motor Carrier Safety AdministrationFederal Register · Rule · Nov 7, 2008
SUMMARY: Under the Clean Air Act, EPA is taking direct final action to approve a revision to the Clark County portion of the Nevada State Implementation Plan (SIP). … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
73 FR 66182Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Sep 14, 2001
ACTION: Notice to extend comment period. … In response to requests from the Utility Air Regulatory Group and the State of Illinois, EPA is extending the comment period for an additional 15 days.
66 FR 47887Environmental Protection AgencyRevisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District
Federal Register · Rule · Jan 22, 2004
We are approving local rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … —General Preamble to Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, April 16, 1992, pages 13540-13541.
69 FR 3018Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; AK, Fairbanks North Star Borough; 2006 PM2.5 Moderate Area Plan
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 8, 2017
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving state implementation plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the State of Alaska (Alaska or the State) to address Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) … , do not diminish the importance of EPA's decision on the State's current plan . . .” and “does not relax the Clean Air Act's requirements for the current submission.”
82 FR 42457Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 17, 2017
Clean Air Act means the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq. Coal means “coal” as defined in § 72.2 of this chapter. … Air Act, and each ton of such excess emissions and each day of such control period shall constitute a separate violation of this subpart and the Clean Air Act
82 FR 48324Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Sep 24, 2015
This final submission pertains to the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act) infrastructure requirements for the 2008 Lead national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). … of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and • does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate
80 FR 57538Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jul 5, 2007
The public comment period ended on May 4, 2007. No comments were received. III. OSM's Findings 1. 4 VAC 25-130-785.25. Lands eligible for remining. … relate to air or water quality standards issued under the authority of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq. ) or the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. ).
72 FR 36595Interior DepartmentSurface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement OfficeAir Plan Approval; KY; Attainment Plan for Jefferson County SO2 Nonattainment Area
Federal Register · Rule · Jun 28, 2019
This plan (hereafter called a “nonattainment plan” or “SIP” or “attainment SIP”) includes Kentucky's attainment demonstration and other elements required under the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). … Ass'n's Clean Air Project v. EPA, 686 F.3d 803 (D.C. Cir. 2012).
84 FR 30920Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 3, 2014
Clean Air Act, unless the context indicates otherwise. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
79 FR 59653Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 1, 1995
Pollutants; Perchloroethylene Air Emission Standards From Dry Cleaning Facilities under section 112(l) of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … No previous delegation of rules or regulations pursuant to title III of the Clean Air Act has been approved.
60 FR 11028Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Sep 8, 2011
EPA is finalizing this action because it is consistent with the Clean Air Act (CAA) and its implementing regulations. … The comment period closed on July 5, 2011. One comment was received in response to the NPR. II.
76 FR 55776Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated Facilities; New York
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 7, 2001
EPA has evaluated the negative declaration submitted by New York for consistency with the Clean Air Act (Act), EPA guidelines and policy. … EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time. H.
66 FR 41146Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Sep 19, 2012
The public comment period ended on April 27, 2012. We did not receive any public comments. III. … relate to air or water quality standards issued under the authority of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq. ) or the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. ).
77 FR 58025Interior DepartmentSurface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement OfficeRevisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District
Federal Register · Rule · Jul 3, 2008
We are approving local rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
73 FR 38122Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 12, 2007
Transportation Conformity Transportation conformity is required under section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) to ensure that federally supported highway, transit projects, and other activities … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
72 FR 58013Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 24, 1995
The intended effect of approving this rule is to regulate emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … Response to Public Comments A 30-day public comment period was provided in the NPRM. EPA received no comments on Rule 346.
60 FR 4562Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.