Documents

Oral argument — Knotts v. Ledbetter

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2026

Second, we have struggle attributed to air hunger. … But he isn't really struggling before the sedative is administered for periods of time.

Oral argument — United States v. 191.07 Acres of Land

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2006

Or Dow would have held – Dow discussed the Tucker Act and said that inverse condemnation lies only in the court of claims pursuant to the Tucker Act. … Because KOK was a pure inverse condemnation action brought pursuant to the Mining and the Parks Act, did not address the Declaration of Takings Act, did not address condemnation with Declaration of Takings

Oral argument — United States v. Vickers

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2022

Vickers didn't challenge that his murder conviction counted as an act of predicate back in 2007. … We cleaned out that line of authority that wouldn't have said indirect force can't qualify. Correct.

Oral argument — People v. Baez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 14, 2010

The capital litigation act was effective. … So Judge Lampkin was acting under color of this court's rules. She was acting under color of the state statutes.

Oral argument — United States v. Polar Star Alaska Housing Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 8, 2011

It's the Declaration of Takings Act. That is the eminent domain act that's applicable to the government. And in fact, remember also, Judge, that all of this is hindsight. … The lease was renewed, the project lease was renewed, through the same period of time that the renewal or the taking would have occurred.

Oral argument — GIANNETTI v. THE BURLINGTON

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2005

Looking at the four corners of the complaint, originally five, all we know is that it is asserted that Giannetti Feldman were negligent, period, and that resulted in property damage. … It's out of acts of negligence, and we are an insured under the policy. The burden then shifts.

Oral argument — Billy Shannon v. Bobby Ham

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2015

The closed period analysis states that if the alleged predicate acts or fraudulent activity are a series of related predicates and they extend over a period of time, then it's a closed period and there … You have the same victims and you have the same methods of commission of the predicate acts. And so the relatedness element of the closed period is met and also the substantial period of time is met.

Oral argument — Ward v. Ryan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 27, 2012

It's not plain air. It's the unreasonable determination. But in both cases, we're supposed to look at the evidence and sense the state court of appeals doesn't articulate the reason. … He acted like a dinosaur, an alligator. He saw daddy put mommy on the hook. He was afraid of Sean. He didn't ever want to see him again. Now, I know you have a four-and-a-half-year-old boy. So do I.

Oral argument — City of Tombstone v. USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2012

The city was also able to clean out one of the other springs, car springs, with hand equipment because there was very little damage there. … Scalia, you can comment on this. Well, counsel, you heard counsel say that they've been doing this for years, until recently, until this issue developed.

Oral argument — Paroline v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 22, 2014

Dreeben I hope that it's not quite as arbitrary as plucking it out of the air, but the reality is that they're certainly not using your theory, even though it's not plucked out of the air. … It has simply taken a joint and several liability regime that this Court has routinely applied against negligent tortfeasors and said when it comes to criminals who act with scienter, acting knowingly

Oral argument — Oliver C. v. EDU-HI

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2019

Would your position be that the Honolulu School District would have to incur the transportation costs of transporting him every day by air from Maui to Honolulu and back? … And so during that period of time of that one-month period, the personnel that would be working with Oliver had received training in ASL.

Oral argument — United States v. Christopher Stoltz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2013

The Coast Guard acted in good faith. They acted in good faith in coordinating with the U.S. Attorney's Office early on. … Punishment for one of them, in terms of nonjudicial punishment, didn't come until ten months after the act. And the other defendants also similarly were long periods of time.

Oral argument — Pit River Tribe v. USFS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2010

Or water discharge permits where there are applications for periodic renewal. … But you have authority in this court in the Air America case saying that 558.

Oral argument — PICTURE IT SOLD, INC v. ISOLD IT

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 15, 2006

I have some responses to some of the comments made in the opening argument. It's your time. Use it as you wish. … It's my understanding that once a concern was raised on the part of picture it sold, that decision was implemented sometime shortly thereafter or some period thereafter.

Oral argument — Steven Valdez v. Philip Neuman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2010

And the provision is section 8 of the Mesa Copyright Act. Well, what it says is that the debt will be assumed upon verification. Correct. Okay. … Well, I would say, to riff off your comment, Your Honor, I think that that's potentially an option.

Oral argument — Alex Cannara v. Karla Nemeth

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2021

issued a proposed decision, the comments were received at the proposed decision, and then they addressed the comments in the final decision. … It just was brought out of thin air. And we're told now you're going to pay $10.5 billion. Where does the idea that you can't change it for 17 years? You cannot change the decision for 17 years.

Oral argument — Stanislaus Food Products Co. v. USS-POSCO Industries

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2015

But a market allocation is also violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. Correct. … Steel was not competing during this period of conspiracy is refuted directly by the record. It didn't exit the market, and it stayed in it.

Oral argument — United States v. Burt

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2005

Thank you for your comments. With no further questions, I thank the court for its time. May it please the court, my name is Jeffrey Jacobson, I represent the United States in this case. … That she intended to commit this criminal act. That she intended to assist the – that she intentionally committed these acts.

Oral argument — United States v. Mario Barazza-Corral

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2017

on Chief Judge Stewart's comments about how we are here on plain error. … I want to — I'll get back to the issue of the merits of the leadership enhancement under the plein air standard in a few minutes.

Oral argument — L.W. v. Commissioner of the Georgia Department of Community Health

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2025

Number one is it's a clean legal issue and it's an easy legal issue. The Supreme Court has made this clear. … It has to be consistent with the Medicaid Act. In the Medicaid Act, nowhere in the Act itself, its regulations, focuses on the parent's capabilities.