Documents

Oral argument — Stanislaus Food Products Co. v. USS-POSCO Industries

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2015

But a market allocation is also violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. Correct. … Steel was not competing during this period of conspiracy is refuted directly by the record. It didn't exit the market, and it stayed in it.

Oral argument — Stephen Grant v. Steven Zorn

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 13, 2023

That's this court in Hayes versus Hoffman Perfect distillation of the public disclosure bar section of the False Claims Act Now the False Claims Act incentivizes citizen participation and blowing the whistle … Grant first in Andrzejczyk Well Andrzejczyk involved a cult leader who for a period of years systematically physically and emotionally abused minors Which this court appropriately considered to be extremely

Oral argument — United States v. Diaz-Menera

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 27, 2022

He's part of this very large conspiracy for a significant period of time. He enlists family members. He's... … And the RICO statute says that basically any act, quote, otherwise dealing in a controlled substance or any act involving dealing in a SUA.

Oral argument — Anthony Mathis v. Terra Renewal Services, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2023

The hissing noise was it escaping, and the air escaping, and it would go away by itself. … I think you could put a period at the end of this case at that point because that's contributory negligence right there coming from the plaintiff's mouth.

Oral argument — United States v. Donald Allen Jr

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2017

I think it was even a shorter period of time than that. I thought it was just maybe two days. Maybe two days, okay. But whatever was subsequent to that. … But still we would, again, obviously I'm out of time, but I think as far as the search is concerned that I would agree with your comments or what I understood your comments to be, Judge Stranch, that a

Oral argument — People v. Barnes

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2012

Barnes' second claim of error is that the state failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he did not act in self-defense. … Were shots fired in the air? Did they hit the house? It would seem that they did hit the house. They did hit the house.

Oral argument — Oliver C. v. EDU-HI

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2019

Would your position be that the Honolulu School District would have to incur the transportation costs of transporting him every day by air from Maui to Honolulu and back? … And so during that period of time of that one-month period, the personnel that would be working with Oliver had received training in ASL.

Oral argument — People v. Ealy

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2019

And it was a shot in the air. Multiple shots. Okay. … You have an intent, a shared intent, to commit some criminal act in retaliation.

Oral argument — Camco Pacific Construction Co v. Lexington Ins. Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2016

If the insurance company has no duty, which is what the District Court held, there's no way you can allege that they acted in bad faith because they had no duty. … the insurance company and there was coverage in that case And so the issue was that they didn't remediate quickly They forced this to trial As I'm sure is the case here with water damage, if you don't clean

Oral argument — Stein v. Krislov

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2013

motion because the plaintiff did not meet that burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that the cpa did not immunize mr krisloff's conduct that was aired for multiple reasons the first i think … that's in keeping with illinois public policy at all that's why these absolute one question with regards to the issue of meritless uh and it hasn't been addressed um there's an allegation that the libel comments

Oral argument — James Richardson v. Joyce Kornegay

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2021

Richardson's trial counsel was objectively unreasonable in failing to appreciate and act on that admissibility requirement to ensure that the expert observed both parties' witnesses. … Obviously, here it wasn't an offhanded comment.

Oral argument — Eckhart v. FOX News Network, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 16, 2026

Specifically, she alleged, and the discovery showed sufficient to survive a motion for summary judgment, that she was raped, sexually assaulted, and sexually harassed by one of FOX News' prominent on-air … Henry here would have the ability and responsibility to engage in some degree of managerial or supervisory acts. And having had the opportunity to work with him specifically and see that.

Oral argument — United Gilsonite Laboratories v. Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2011

Which are both bringing this under the purview of the act. Yes. Okay. … Bergman did not have sarcoidosis before December the 19th or around that time period of 1996.

Oral argument — Fraley v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 23, 2025

Zucke asking the question, if you compare how you were at those two different periods, you certainly were any worse. True. … Petitioner testified he's currently working at Amazon Air. He's stacking boxes, airport containers onto rollers so he can stack them.

Oral argument — United States v. Steven Blakeney

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 20, 2017

And we note that you're appointed under the Criminal Justice Act, and the court wants you to know that we deeply appreciate your willingness to accept the assignment. Absolutely, Your Honor. … thus is a comment on his failure to testify.

Oral argument — Rhode v. Bonta

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 25, 2026

And we think that it's a very clean analysis here. And that, of course, a law that says you have to pass through a gate that the government controls in order to acquire ammunition. … Thank you for your additional comments. And you have some time left for rebuttal. So I wanted to just start with the Dormant Commerce Clause claim.

Oral argument — NLPC v. East Coast Lightning Equipment

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2020

I'll begin my presentation by addressing the Court's request for discussion about jurisdiction, and then I'll move on to the Lanham Act issues. … But all they have said is that these people bought our product, period. No additional commentary, no additional claims, no nothing.

Oral argument — United States v. Ludwikowski

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 19, 2019

Lew Bukoski, but others who are talking about a present extortion scheme would often be forced to discuss prior criminal activity, prior bad acts of some kind. … And you need to come clean with us. That's right. That's right. Because you're asking us to go out there and take action on your behalf.

Oral argument — People v. King

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 27, 2019

The second basis is that he acted as his own counsel. … So this did give counsel some, perhaps, leverage if there was a clean negotiation to go on. But the overriding concern here is that he represented himself.

Oral argument — Watkins v. Ingalls Memorial Hospital

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2018

And whether it's filing a lawsuit or feeding themselves and cleaning themselves. … Also in federal court, the question of tolling is an open question as to whether a mental incapacity may toll the limitations period in the Federal Courts Claims Act.