Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Randall v. Sorrell

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

This is exactly what Act 64 accomplishes. … When should the legal system modify the rules creating the market system to price goods— such as security, social stability, or clean air—that other market-based legal rules might not?

Amicus Curiae Brief — National Rifle Association, Incorporated, Petitioner v. Mark Glass, Commissioner, Florida Department of Law Enforcement

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 20, 2025

Act 59 ........................................................ 19 1890 La. Acts 39 ....................................................... 19 1890 Wyo. Terr. Sess. … Militia Act of 1792, §1, 1 Stat. 271.

Amicus Curiae Brief — U.S. Bank Corp. v. Kroske (No. 05-1607)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

United Air Lines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471, 482-83 (1999). … Under federal law, notice of a pending termination is sufficient to begin the time period to file suit.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Victoria Independent School District v. Harris

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999

in or aware of Respondents’ comments. … 8 Similarly, Respondents’ comments were directed to fellow teachers, not the general public. They spoke up to air their per- sonal gripes about the principal.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Mahanoy Area School District, Petitioner v. B. L., a Minor, By and Through Her Father, Lawrence Levy and Her Mother, Betty Lou Levy

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 31, 2021

(cleaned up). … Keyishian, 385 U.S. at 603 (cleaned up).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Washington v. Glucksberg

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997

"Adequate" palliative care may also require extended periods of sedation to the point of permanent or temporary unconsciousness. … Compassion in Dying. 79 F.3d at 835 ("My son-in-law then had the unfortunate and unpleasant task of cleaning my father’s splattered brains off the basement walls.”)

Amicus Curiae Brief — Federal Election Com'n v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007

Act of 2002, Pub. … The justifications for the regulation of express advocacy apply equally to ads aired during those periods if the ads are intended to influence the voters’ decisions and have that effect.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas City

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1966

We make no comment on whether this is a correct or incorrect reading of that Court’s decisions. … February 18, 1965 Air Mail Mr. George E.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Grimes v. Centerior Energy Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991

SET scitiennalinahaeniimingeseesyesnmmeneeuranreaNeT 11 STATUTES: Securities Exchange Act of 1934, § 25(a), 15 U.S.C. … For example, USA opposes “classified boards,’”’ under which directors are elected for staggered terms to forestall clean-sweep replacement of unsatisfactory management by the shareholders.

Amicus Curiae Brief — David Cassirer, et al., Petitioners v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 3, 2025

Headquartered in Los Angeles, SWC has offices in New York, Chicago, Miami, Toronto, Paris, Jerusalem, and Buenos Aires. Moriah Films is the two-time Academy Award®winning film division of the SWC. … Holocaust Victims Redress Act, PL 105-158, 112 Stat. 15 (Feb. 13, 1998).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Bradley Little, Governor of Idaho, et al., Petitioners v. Lindsay Hecox, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 14, 2024

In the middle of that period, I switched to triathlon needing something more challenging to convince myself of my capability in the face of so many claiming I was incapable. … “Testosterone and androgenizing drugs were given in large quantities to East German athletes, creating an unfair advantage clean athletes could not overcome.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Sprint/United Management Co. v. Mendelsohn

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008

United States, 487 U.S. 99, 110 (1988) (“Artificial entities such as corporations may act only through their agents”): CFTC v. … Yet allegations of discrimination in the air—like “Ipjroof of negligence in the air’”-——will not do” (Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R., 162 N.E. 99, 99 (N.Y. 1928) (Cardozo, J.)

Amicus Curiae Brief — FCC v. NextWave Personal Communications Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003

Serv., 728 F.2d 347 (6th Cir. 1984); the Packers and Stockyard Act, 1921,7 U.S.C. §§ 181-299; and section 1 of the Act entitled “An Act making appropriations for the Department of Agriculture for the … Rev’d UCC § 9-109(a)(1), comment 1. The creditors were entitled to rely on the expectation that the FCC could not circumvent the Code through such legerdemain.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Department of Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Assn.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

The KPOP will be finally developed and implemented by the Bureau of Reclamation following input, comment and review not only from the BIA and Tribes, but from other federal agencies, water users and … Department of Air Force, 518 F.2d 1184 (8th Cir. 1975); Wu v. National Endowment for Humanities, 460 F.2d 1030 (5th Cir. 1972).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Evenwel v. Abbott, 135 S. Ct. 2349 (2015) (No. 14-940)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page QUESTIONS PRESENTED .......000000:000scscsessscsesesssesees i ee I aire cietdncisesesssccnsinsitnsnnsscs v INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE..............2..222.c2000000000 1 SUMMARY … Comment. 355, 357 n.7 (2004).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Michael J. Bost, et al., Petitioners v. Illinois State Board of Elections, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 23, 2024

Clapper was a challenge to Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) where the plaintiffs’ alleged that their “communications will be acquired . . . at some point in the future.” … Corp., 429 U.S. 252, 260-61 (1977) (cleaned up). Political parties also have standing to represent their members.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Leslie Rutledge, Attorney General of Arkansas, Petitioner v. Pharmaceutical Care Management Association

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 2, 2020

Delta Air Lines, Inc., 563 U.S. 87 (1983)............................................7, 15 U.S. Dep’t of Treasury v. … Commentators, for example, have recognized preemption’s challenge to State laws that combat surprise, out-of-network medical bills.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Hartford Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Union Planters Bank, NA

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000

Asa result, when Congress amends the bankruptcy laws, “it does not write ‘on a clean slate.” Dewsnup v. Timm, 502 U.S. at 419 (quoting Emil v. Hanley, 318 U.S. 515, 521 (1943)). … Out- side of bankruptcy, the insurer may cancel a policy during the policy period for nonpayment.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Randall v. Sorrell

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

This is exactly what Act 64 accomplishes. … When should the legal system modify the rules creating the market system to price goods— such as security, social stability, or clean air—that other market-based legal rules. might not?

Amicus Curiae Brief — Bank of America Nat. Trust and Sav. Assn. v. 203 North LaSalle Street Partnership

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999

Del. 1991); had they filed in the Southern District of Texas, where the debtor’s principal assets were located, they could have argued about new value on a clean slate. … Act practice only in theory.