Documents

Oral argument — Camco Pacific Construction Co v. Lexington Ins. Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2016

If the insurance company has no duty, which is what the District Court held, there's no way you can allege that they acted in bad faith because they had no duty. … the insurance company and there was coverage in that case And so the issue was that they didn't remediate quickly They forced this to trial As I'm sure is the case here with water damage, if you don't clean

Oral argument — Goldstein v. Harris

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2003

The bottom line is that we're asked to believe that these police officers committed such a gross act of misconduct that they should themselves be imprisoned, that within a two-minute process they became … And the testimony was not neat and clean, Your Honors. It was, it really had the indicia of truthful testimony, because he, when I say he, Mr. Campbell didn't give us everything we wanted.

Oral argument — Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Hea

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 18, 2020

They're part of a broader agenda to try to get legislation, as they cited from one of the groups at a meeting, to talk about pressuring the companies to go along with the clean air agenda. … He said, just so we're clear, at the end of the day, you're going to prove a Martin Act violation or you're not. And these affirmative defenses are irrelevant to the merits of that case.

Oral argument — In re: Marriage of Geiser

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2021

This is even contrary to his website advertising, which we presented to the court as evidence for his latest company, Clean Cut Painting and have proudly grown the company. … In fact, in the DeFatta case, the court went back 10 years and was found to have acted properly.

Oral argument — United States v. Heredia

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2004

Because the district court, and she wants to establish, well, you know, when I dropped it off, boy, it was clean as a whistle. That's correct. … Notices a strong odor of air freshener or downy, something like that, in the car that's commonly used to mask marijuana.

Oral argument — United States v. Castillo-Martinez

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2021

Yes, so was a petition for review filed post the BIA decision or was that 30-day period over before Moncrief came down? The 30-day period was over before Moncrief. … And in respect to her comments about Luna, in Luna, there was a request for 212C discretionary relief.

Oral argument — Computer Sciences v. Tata Consultancy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 29, 2025

So, reading comments like that, in light of clear authorization, I think there's only two conclusions. … Well, you know, I think if the damages had been confined to some measure over a specific period, that would be true.

Oral argument — Mark Tamosiunas v. NLRB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2018

That's not what the act is supposing. … We're going to quickly clean this up. The union didn't. So if you're going to go to the after the fact, all you're doing is making your case worse. Because Hyatt protected itself.

Oral argument — Lesley Eugene Warren v. Marvin Polk

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2018

Your verdict will be an act of self-defense. The verdict is an act of self-defense. We've got nothing even remotely comparable. … It does, Your Honor, and particularly during this time period. I mean, obviously all these issues are still getting fleshed out.

Oral argument — Fraternal Order of Police v. City of Chicago

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 16, 2016

Klink, let me sort of respond to the comment you just made or ask you a question based on the comment you just made. Sure. As I mentioned earlier, this is an interlocutory appeal. … What the public may be interested in varies wildly and changes over periods of time.

Oral argument — Oracle USA, Inc. v. Rimini Street, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2023

So there are no environments on Rumini's systems, period, full stop. Every environment is on a client system. Clients all have licenses. … The train jumped the tracks going back to TiVo, solves that problem, and wipes the board clean. Thank you, Your Honors. Thank you, Counsel. This case is submitted.

Oral argument — Belfiore v. Procter & Gamble C

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 10, 2019

The most important aspect of this shows is how effective they are in cleaning. You don't buy something just because of the method of disposal. You like the way it works. … And that is that by adopting the Kimberly analysis, you avoid the undermining of the New York consumer protection act.

Oral argument — Alan Dershowitz v. Cable News Network, Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2024

, not this act. … Because as we've said, all of this has been fully aired at this point and at least these people say that's still what they think.

Oral argument — Sonya Williams v. Shelby Co TN Bd of Ed

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2024

So theoretically, she's entitled to damages for that period, right? … Williams argues that they were just simply trying to clean it up, but there's absolutely no evidence of that, and they took out substantial, important language related to the requirements of the list and

Oral argument — A. Philip Randolph Institute v. North Carolina State Board of Elections

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2025

But during the time period that led to the record in this case, there were – I'm trying to get the exact figures, Your Honor. … It's not clean. And there's a clean way to do it, particularly in terms of the representation of the other side.

Oral argument — Golden v. CH2M Hill Hanford Group

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2007

In other words, deposition was a time period when – I can't give you the exact time, but it was several months before the declaration. Just because Mr. … It just had to be, as Judge Kaczynski well put it, because you ran out of air. I think the answer to the second question is that that would not be covered by the Price-Anderson Act.

Oral argument — United States v. Mendoza

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2006

It can mean the defendant acting. It does not require that the defendant acted for financial gain, just that someone did. … And I commented that on closing argument.

Oral argument — United States v. Juan Rodriguez-Sifuentes

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 6, 2016

incorporated those comments. … Again, there was no public airing of the materiality and the contours of the witnesses' testimony.

Oral argument — Scott Nordstrom v. Charles Ryan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2017

Because we cannot act without jurisdiction at any point. … It's been fully aired. It's now been vetted by the district court, by this court, on two occasions.

Oral argument — Steven Aquino v. Alejandro Mayorkas

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2021

And the court disagreed and said the 45 days ran from the discrete act, which was when the accommodations were denied. … Well, I mean, the real problem here is that you have a 45-day period. The usual period for a Title VII case is, I think, six months. So it's not unworkable. Everybody else seems to work under it.